Pathophysiology of Facial Nerve Stimulation and Its Implications for Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVES: A small number of cochlear implant (CI) users experience facial nerve stimulation (FNS), which can manifest as facial twitching. In some patients, this can be resolved by adjusting the electrical stimulation parameters. However, for others, facial stimulation can significantly impair CI outcomes or even prevent its use. The exact mechanisms underlying FNS are unclear and may vary among patients. DESIGN: Transimpedance measurements were used to assess lateral and longitudinal spread of current within 15 cochlea of nucleus CI recipients with FNS (13 unilateral recipients and 1 bilateral recipient). We compared the transimpedance measurements with programming parameters from clinical visits and pre- and postoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scans to identify factors that may contribute to FNS in each CI ear. RESULTS: In nine ears, transimpedance curves showed inflection, which suggests a localized current sink within the cochlea. This indicates a low-impedance pathway through which current exits the cochlea and stimulates the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve canal. Electrodes near this current sink were disabled or underfit to minimize facial stimulation. In the other seven ears, current flow peaked toward the basal end of the cochlea, suggesting that current exits through the round window or other structures near the basal end of the cochlea, stimulating the tympanic segment of the facial nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Objective transimpedance measurements can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of FNS and to develop strategies for optimizing electrical stimulation parameters and speech coding to minimize or eliminate FNS in a small subset of CI users.

European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the preservation of residual hearing in subjects who received the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. To investigate the performance benefits up to one year post-implantation in terms of speech recognition, sound quality, and quality of life. DESIGN: Prospective, with sequential enrolment and within-subject comparisons. Post-operative performance using a Freedom Hybrid sound processor was compared with that of pre-operative hearing aids. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-six adult hearing-impaired subjects with bilateral severe-to-profound high frequency hearing loss. RESULTS: Group median increase in air-conduction thresholds in the implanted ear for test frequencies 125-1000 Hz was < 15 dB across the population; both immediately and one year post-operatively. Eighty-eight percent of subjects used the Hybrid processor at one year post-op. Sixty-five percent of subjects had significant gain in speech recognition in quiet, and 73% in noise (≥ 20 percentage points/2 dB SNR). Mean SSQ subscale scores were significantly improved (+ 1.2, + 1.3, + 1.8 points, p < 0.001), as was mean HUI3 score (+ 0.117, p < 0.01). Combining residual hearing with CI gave 22-26 %age points mean benefit in speech recognition scores over CI alone (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Useful residual hearing was conserved in 88% of subjects. Speech perception was significantly improved over preoperative hearing aids, as was sound quality and quality of life.

Effect of changing pulse rate on profile parameters of perceptual thresholds and loudness comfort levels and relation to ECAP thresholds in recipients of the Nucleus CI24RE device.

The Nucleus CI24RE 'Freedom' device offers higher stimulation rates and lower noise levels in action potential measurements (ECAPs) than previous devices. A study including ten European implant teams showed that the effect of changes in rate from 250 to 3500 pulses per second on tilt and curvature of the T and C profiles is insignificant. When changing rate one may change the levels at all electrodes by the same amount. Using an automated procedure ECAPs could be measured quickly and reliably at a noise level of only 1 microV, this did not result in improved correlations between the tilt and curvature parameters of the ECAP profiles and those of the T and C profiles. Average C levels appear to differ markedly among implant centers; a better assessment protocol is required. When increasing stimulus rate one should take into account that this requires higher pulse charges per second and more power consumption.

Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.

Patients with high-frequency deafness and/or substantial residual hearing across frequencies might benefit from combined electro-acoustic stimulation. The Hybrid-L electrode was designed to address the issues of both hearing conservation and effective electrical stimulation in those recipients. The electrode with 22 contacts should be inserted through the round window membrane, and covers approximately 270 degrees of the basal turn of the cochlear. This insertion length is equivalent to the one seen in many patients using the former Nucleus straight electrode. Twenty-four patients with low-frequency thresholds of 60 dB or better, up to 500 Hz, were implanted with a Hybrid-L device in a clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover. Another group of 8 recipients with less residual hearing was included under extended inclusion criteria. Residual hearing was conserved in the majority of cases. One patient had a loss of more than 30 dB, but hearing partially recovered after 9 months. The median loss in all patients was 10 dB in both the Hybrid group and the extended group. Patients were able to use the residual hearing postoperatively to the same extent as preoperatively. In the Hybrid mode (cochlear implant + ipsilateral hearing aid), patients showed a significant improvement of 21% (p = 0.002) in speech understanding in quiet using the Freiburger Monosyllabic Word Test compared to the preoperative scores under aided conditions with their hearing aid. The Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise showed a remarkable average improvement of 10.2 dB (p < 0.001) compared to the preoperative hearing aid only mode. An additional improvement could be seen in the combined mode using an additional contralateral hearing aid. Recipients with a shorter duration of high-frequency hearing loss showed a larger benefit than those with a longer duration of hearing loss. Hearing conservation using the Hybrid-L electrode and a given surgical technique is possible with high probability in patients with high-frequency deafness or pantonal hearing loss. The use of the residual acoustic hearing offers specific advantages, especially for understanding speech in noise and for spatial hearing.

Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVES: The first objective of the study was to determine whether there were any consistent differences in the electrophysiological spread of excitation (SOE) function, as measured using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), between dual and single electrode stimulation with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. Dual electrode stimulation is produced by electrically coupling two adjacent single electrodes. The second objective was to determine whether there were any relationships between the SOE functions and psychophysically measured pitch ranking of dual and single electrodes. DESIGN: Nine adult cochlear implant subjects participated in the study. ECAPs for dual and single electrode stimulation were measured using the forward masking paradigm, as also used in the Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) software with the Nucleus implant. Research software was used to generate the dual and single electrode stimuli and record the ECAPs. Spread of excitations (SOEs) were measured on a dual electrode and the two adjacent single electrodes, at three positions on the array: apical, mid, and basal. Compared were the ECAP amplitudes at the peak of the SOE functions, the widths of the scaled SOE functions at the 75% point, and the electrode positions at the peak of the SOE function and at the 75%, 50%, and 25% points on apical and basal sides of the scaled functions. Pitch ranking was measured for the same sets of dual and single electrodes. A two-alternative forced choice procedure was used, with the electrodes in each set paired with each other as AB and BA pairs. The subject indicated which of the two stimuli had the higher pitch. RESULTS: Dual electrode SOEs could be successfully obtained using the same methods as used to measure single electrode SOEs. The shapes of the dual and single electrodes SOEs were similar. There was a trend of a higher ECAP amplitude for the dual electrode at the peak of the SOE function, but this was only significant for two comparisons at the apical and basal positions. There were no significant differences in the SOE widths between dual and single electrodes. The electrodes at the peak of the SOE function and on the apical and basal sides of the function at the 75% position were, in most cases, tonotopically ordered. At the 50% and 25% positions, there were fewer significant differences between the dual and single electrodes The pitch ranking results showed that in 74% of cases, the single and dual electrodes at each position were successfully ranked in the expected tonotopic order. There were no statistically significant correlations between the pitch ranking results and the ordering of electrodes on the SOE functions. CONCLUSIONS: Dual electrode stimulation produced similar SOE functions as single electrode stimulation. A tonotopic ordering of electrodes at the peak of the SOE and on the sides of the functions was found, but this was not statistically related to the pitch ranking results. SUMMARY: Electrophysiological spread of neural excitation (SOE) and pitch perception using dual and single electrodes was investigated in nine subjects using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Dual electrodes are produced by electrically coupling two adjacent single electrodes. The dual and single electrodes SOEs were similar in shape. Higher electrophysiological response amplitudes were generally found for the dual electrodes. There were no differences in SOE widths between dual and single electrodes. In three quarters of cases, dual and single electrodes were successfully pitch ranked in the expected tonotopic order. No significant relationships between pitch ranking and the SOE functions were found.

Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Due to improved technology, cochlear implant (CI) candidacy has been widened towards patients with usable residual hearing in the low frequency range. These patients might benefit from additional acoustic amplification provided that residual hearing can be preserved with cochlear implantation. To provide a high probability of hearing preservation, a new electrode array was designed and developed at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. This 'Hybrid-L' electrode array has 22 electrodes spread over 15 mm with an overall insertion depth of 16 mm. The straight electrode with modiolus facing contacts is designed for a round window insertion. It shall provide the full range of the currently most advanced Nucleus CI system. A temporal bone study demonstrated the favorable insertion characteristics and minimized trauma to intracochlear structures. Compared to standard CI electrodes especially no basilar membrane perforation could be found. So far, 4 patients have been implanted and residual hearing could be preserved. One patient was fitted and showed a marked additional benefit from the electroacoustic stimulation compared to either acoustic or electrical stimulation alone. These results are very encouraging towards a concept of reliable hearing preservation with cochlear implantation.

Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.

HYPOTHESIS: Perimodiolar intracochlear electrodes with contacts facing towards the modiolus have limited current flow towards the outer wall of the cochlea and therefore, may reduce the occurrence of facial nerve stimulation (FN) in cochlear implant subjects. BACKGROUND: Facial nerve stimulation is a well-known complication in cochlear implant treatment especially in the group of subjects with otosclerosis. The possible explanation of this side effect is a change of the electrical properties of the otosclerotic bone leading to leakage current and resulting in facial nerve stimulation. METHODS: Four CI subjects who had been implanted with a Nucleus Mini22 device with a Nucleus Straight electrode between 9 to 12 years ago suffered from severe FN stimulation. Electrode contacts had to be switched off so that they could only use 4, 11, 13, and 15 electrodes of their usual set of 22. The switch off resulted in deteriorating speech understanding over time. Therefore, all subjects were reimplanted with a Nucleus 24R device with a Contour electrode. Preoperatively, the threshold of FN stimulation was obtained on all electrodes subjectively. Intraoperatively, FN stimulation thresholds were measured objectively with both, the old and the new device and were compared. NRT and SRT thresholds were also obtained with the reimplanted device to assure effective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. RESULTS: In all four cases the postoperative fitting demonstrated no FN stimulation on all electrodes up to maximum comfortable level. The insertion of the Contour electrode array was complete in three cases, in one case the array could only be inserted partially similarly to the situation before the reimplantation. Speech perception tests showed a significant improvement in all subjects with the new device. CONCLUSION: Electrodes with modiolar facing contacts and perimodiolar position like the Nucleus Contour electrode reduce the possibility of facial nerve stimulation significantly due to more focused electrical stimulation.

Evaluation of the neural response telemetry (NRT) capabilities of the nucleus research platform 8: initial results from the NRT trial.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new features of the Nucleus Research Platform 8 (RP8), a system developed specifically for research purposes The RP8 consists of a research implant, a speech processor and a new NRT software (NRT v4), and includes comparisons of the different artefact-cancellation methods, NRT threshold, and recovery function measurements. The system has new artefact-suppression techniques and new diagnostic capabilities; their performance has been verified in animal experiments. In this study, NRT data were collected from 15 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients intraoperatively and up to 6 months postoperatively after switch-on. The initial investigation in two clinics in Europe focused primarily on the enhanced NRT capabilities Results from the trial in two European clinics indicate that NRT measurements can be obtained with lower noise levels. A comparison of the different artefact-cancellation techniques showed that the forward-masking paradigm implemented in the Nucleus 3 system is still the method of choice. The focus of this report is on recovery function characteristics, which may give insight into auditory nerve fiber properties with regard to higher stimulation rates.