Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Braz J Microbiol ; 50(4): 935-942, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401781

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella infections are reported from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide, but data on their incidence and genetic diversity remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: We determined the incidence and genetic diversity of Klebsiella infections in NICU patients in Rio de Janeiro. METHODS: This was a prospective study including newborns admitted to NICU in three hospitals during April 2005-November 2006 and March 2008-February 2009. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were genotyped by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and extended spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) were characterized. RESULTS: Klebsiella infections occurred in 38 of 3984 patients (incidence rate, 9.5/1000 admissions); 14 (37%) of these 38 newborns died. Two clonal groups, CC45 and CC1041, caused 11 cases (42% of K. pneumoniae infection). Ten (32%) of the isolates causing infection produced ESBL, 9 of which (83%) carried blaCTX-M-15, all belonging to clonal complex (CC) 45 and CC1041. Nine of these ESBL-producing isolates were confined to only one of the NICUs. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of Klebsiella infections in NICU in Rio de Janeiro appeared to be due to a combination of frequent sporadic infections caused by multiple K. pneumoniae genotypes and small outbreaks caused by dominant multidrug-resistant clones.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Female , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Male , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Prospective Studies , Urban Population , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
3.
Pediatrics ; 120(2): e382-90, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17664257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Hand hygiene promotion interventions rarely result in sustained improvement, and an assessment of their impact on individual infection risk has been lacking. We sought to measure the impact of hand hygiene promotion on health care worker compliance and health care-associated infection risk among neonates. METHODS: We conducted an intervention study with a 9-month follow-up among all of the health care workers at the neonatal unit of the Children's Hospital, University of Geneva Hospitals, between March 2001 and February 2004. A multifaceted hand hygiene education program was introduced with compliance assessed during successive observational surveys. Health care-associated infections were prospectively monitored, and genotypic relatedness of bloodstream pathogens was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. A comparison of observed hand hygiene compliance and infection rates before, during, and after the intervention was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 5325 opportunities for hand hygiene were observed. Overall compliance improved gradually from 42% to 55% across study phases. This trend remained significant after adjustment for possible confounders and paralleled the measured increase in hand-rub consumption (from 66.6 to 89.2 L per 1000 patient-days). A 9-month follow-up survey showed sustained improvement in compliance (54%), notably with direct patient contact (49% at baseline vs 64% at follow-up). Improved compliance was independently associated with infection risk reduction among very low birth weight neonates. Bacteremia caused by clonally related pathogens markedly decreased after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene promotion, guided by health care workers' perceptions, identification of the dynamics of bacterial contamination of health care workers' hands, and performance feedback, is effective in sustaining compliance improvement and is independently associated with infection risk reduction among high-risk neonates.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Hygiene , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Disinfection/methods , Humans , Hygiene/standards , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/methods , Risk Factors
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 34(10): 627-35, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In October 2004, The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the World Alliance for Patient Safety. Within the alliance, the first priority of the Global Patient Safety Challenge is to reduce health care-associated infection. A key action within the challenge is to promote hand hygiene in health care globally as well as at the country level through the campaign "Clean Care is Safer Care." As a result, the WHO is developing Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, designed to be applicable throughout the world. METHODS: This paper summarizes one component of the global WHO guidelines related to the impact of hand hygiene on the skin of health care personnel, including a discussion of types of skin reactions associated with hand hygiene, methods to reduce adverse reactions, and factors to consider when selecting hand hygiene products. RESULTS: Health care professionals have a higher prevalence of skin irritation than seen in the general population because of the necessity for frequent hand hygiene during patient care. CONCLUSION: Ways to minimize adverse effects of hand hygiene include selecting less irritating products, using skin moisturizers, and modifying certain hand hygiene practices such as unnecessary washing. Institutions need to consider several factors when selecting hand hygiene products: dermal tolerance and aesthetic preferences of users as well as practical considerations such as convenience, storage, and costs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Contact/prevention & control , Hand Dermatoses/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Health Personnel , Soaps/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/standards , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/supply & distribution , Choice Behavior , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Emollients , Guideline Adherence , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand Disinfection/standards , Health Personnel/education , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Occupational Health , Pilot Projects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin Care/methods , Soaps/standards , Soaps/supply & distribution , World Health Organization
6.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 6(10): 641-52, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17008173

ABSTRACT

Hand cleansing is the primary action to reduce health-care-associated infection and cross-transmission of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. Patient-to-patient transmission of pathogens via health-care workers' hands requires five sequential steps: (1) organisms are present on the patient's skin or have been shed onto fomites in the patient's immediate environment; (2) organisms must be transferred to health-care workers' hands; (3) organisms must be capable of surviving on health-care workers' hands for at least several minutes; (4) handwashing or hand antisepsis by the health-care worker must be inadequate or omitted entirely, or the agent used for hand hygiene inappropriate; and (5) the caregiver's contaminated hand(s) must come into direct contact with another patient or with a fomite in direct contact with the patient. We review the evidence supporting each of these steps and propose a dynamic model for hand hygiene research and education strategies, together with corresponding indications for hand hygiene during patient care.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection , Hand/microbiology , Health Personnel , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Education , Fomites/microbiology , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Microbial Viability , Models, Biological , Skin/microbiology
7.
Microb Drug Resist ; 12(1): 50-8, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16584309

ABSTRACT

A prospective cohort study was undertaken to describe the epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBLKp) acquisition at an intensive care unit (ICU) in a non-outbreak setting. Surveillance for ESBLKp colonization and infection was performed in patients admitted at the ICU from January, 2000, to May, 2001. Screening for ESBLKp intestinal colonization was done by culturing rectal swab specimens at admission, 72 hr after admission and weekly until discharge or detection of ESBLKp. The incidence of ESBLKp intestinal colonization was 5.8/1,000 patient-days (95%CI, 3.4-10.1), and of ESBLKp infection was 1.7/1,000 patient-days (95%CI, 0.7-4.2). Use of vancomycin (OR 6.6; 95%CI, 1.73-25.28), amphotericin B (OR 12.0; 95%CI, 1.79-80.51), metronidazole (OR 5.3; 95%CI, 1.10-25.65), and ciprofloxacin (OR 0.1; 95%CI, 0.01-0.97) were independently associated with ESBLKp intestinal colonization. Previous ESBLKp colonization (OR 60.6; 95%CI, 56.33-578.73) was independently associated with ESBLKp infection. Each ICU-acquired ESBLKp isolate belonged to a different genotype by ERIC-PCR or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and had a different plasmid profile, suggesting that cross transmission was not the main source for ESBLKp acquisition. Factors associated with ESBLKp in the non-outbreak setting were different from those previously reported during outbreaks. Intestinal ESBLKp colonization was confirmed as a risk factor for infection by this pathogen.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis , Cohort Studies , Genotype , Humans , Incidence , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Length of Stay , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Plasmids , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , beta-Lactamases/genetics
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 26(3): 305-11, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15796285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications are frequent among critically ill neonates. Hand hygiene is the leading measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections, but poor compliance has been repeatedly documented, including in the neonatal setting. Hand hygiene promotion requires a complex approach that should consider personal factors affecting healthcare workers' attitudes. OBJECTIVE: To identify beliefs and perceptions associated with intention to comply with hand hygiene among neonatal healthcare workers. METHODS: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire (74 items) based on the theory of planned behavior was distributed to 80 neonatal healthcare workers to assess intention to comply, attitude toward hand hygiene, behavioral and subjective norm perceptions, and perception of difficulty to comply. Variables were assessed using multi-item measures and answers to 7-point bipolar scales. All multi-item scales had satisfactory internal consistency (alpha > 0.7). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent perceptions or beliefs associated with a positive intention to comply. RESULTS: The response rate was 76% (61 of 80). Of the 49 nurses and 12 physicians responding, 75% believed that they could improve their compliance with hand hygiene. Intention to comply was associated with perceived control over the difficulty to perform hand hygiene (OR, 3.12; CI95, 1.12 to 8.70; P = .030) and a positive perception of how superiors valued hand hygiene (OR, 2.89; CI95, 1.08 to 7.77; P = .035). CONCLUSION: Our data highlight the importance of the opinions of superiors and a strong perceived controllability over the difficulty to perform hand hygiene as possible internal factors that may influence hand hygiene compliance.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Hand Disinfection , Health Personnel/standards , Adult , Critical Care , Health Behavior , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hygiene/standards , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Microb Drug Resist ; 11(1): 21-5, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15770090

ABSTRACT

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of 60 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBLKp) isolates obtained in a neonatal intensive care unit during an outbreak indicated the dissemination of two major bacterial genotypes associated with colonization and invasive disease: one composed by aminoglycoside-resistant isolates and the other by aminoglycoside-susceptible isolates. A urease-negative phenotype was observed among aminoglycoside-resistant ESBLKp. Six pairs of isolates from gastrointestinal (GI) colonization and isolates from invasive disease that occurred 3-23 days later were shown to belong to the same genotype, reinforcing a direct association between colonization and subsequent disease. These data indicate that screening for ESBLKp GI colonization in an outbreak setting may be useful to detect neonates at a higher risk of invasive disease.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 25(9): 772-7, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15484803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) among neonates. DESIGN: Prospective surveillance of HAIs was conducted during 2 years. Infections beginning within 48 hours of birth were defined as HAIs of maternal origin. Death occurring during an active episode of HAI was considered related to HAI. SETTING: Seven neonatal units located in three Brazilian cities. PATIENTS: All admitted neonates were included and observed until discharge. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of 4,878 neonates had at least one HAI. The overall incidence density was 24.9 per 1,000 patient-days, and 28.1% of all HAIs were maternally acquired. HAI rates ranged from 12.3% in the group with a birth weight (BW) of more than 2,500 g to 51.9% in the group with a BW of 1,000 g or less. The main HAIs were bloodstream infection (BSI) and pneumonia. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the main pathogens. Forty percent of all deaths were related to HAI. Central venous catheter (CVC)-associated BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days ranged from 17.3 (BW, 1,501 to 2,500 g; device utilization [DU], 0.11) to 34.9 (BW, < or = 1,000 g; DU, 34.92). Ventilator-associated pneumonia per 1,000 ventilator-days ranged from 7.0 (BW, < or = 1,000 g; DU, 0.34) to 9.2 (BW, 1,001 to 1,500 g; DU, 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of HAIs of maternal origin highlights perinatal care issues in Brazil and the need to improve the diagnosis of neonatal HAIs. The very low BW group and device-associated infections should be priorities for prevention strategies in this population.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Infant, Premature , Brazil/epidemiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Risk Factors
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 25(3): 192-7, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15061408

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamics of bacterial contamination of healthcare workers' (HCWs) hands during neonatal care. SETTING: The 20-bed neonatal unit of a large acute care teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. METHODS: Structured observation sessions were conducted. A sequence of care began when the HCW performed hand hygiene and ended when the activity changed or hand hygiene was performed again. Alcohol-based handrub was the standard procedure for hand hygiene. An imprint of the five fingertips of the dominant hand was obtained before and after hand hygiene and at the end of a sequence of care. Regression methods were used to model the final bacterial count according to the type and duration of care and the use of gloves. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine sequences of care were observed. Commensal skin flora comprised 72.4% of all culture-positive specimens (n = 360). Other microorganisms identified were Enterobacteriaceae (n = 55, 13.8%); Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10, 2.5%); and fungi (n = 7, 1.8%). Skin contact, respiratory care, and diaper change were independently associated with an increased bacterial count; the use of gloves did not fully protect HCWs' hands from bacterial contamination. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that hands become progressively contaminated with commensal flora and potential pathogens during neonatal care, and identify activities at higher risk for hand contamination. They also reinforce the need for hand hygiene after a sequence of care, before starting a different task, and after glove removal.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection/standards , Hand/microbiology , Infection Control/standards , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Personnel, Hospital/standards , Alcohols/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Colony Count, Microbial , Diapers, Infant/microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Regression Analysis , Skin/microbiology , Switzerland
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 23(11): 689-92, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12452298

ABSTRACT

A prospective cohort study was conducted during a 15-month period to compare nosocomial infections (NIs) among pediatric patients without (n = 989 and with (n = 50) symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Patients with symptomatic HIV infection presented higher overall NI incidence density rates (relative risk, 1.65; P= .0001), and may represent a population at high risk for the acquisition of NI.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , Hospitals, Pediatric , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Child, Hospitalized , Cross Infection/classification , Cross Infection/complications , Hospitals, University , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay , Prospective Studies , Sentinel Surveillance
13.
J Pediatr ; 141(3): 381-7, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12219059

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the investigation and control of an outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Infantis in a neonatal unit in Brazil. METHODS: A case-control study for risk factors for Salmonella Infantis systemic infection, environmental cultures, and evaluation of staffing and overcrowding and an assessment of infection control practices were performed. RESULTS: During July 1998 to June 1999, 140 Salmonella Infantis culture-positive patients were identified in the neonatal unit. Presence of a peripheral intravascular catheter was identified as an independent risk factor (odds ratio = 4.98; 95% CI = 1.59-19.31; P =.01) and each 250-g increase in birth weight as a protective factor (odds ratio = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.57-0.95; P =.03). Hospital stay was significantly longer and costs higher in case patients than in control patients. Salmonella Infantis was isolated from multiple environmental sources. Neonatal unit personnel were observed to make several breaks in infection control practices. The unit was understaffed and overcrowded. Prompt case identification, cohorting of patients, enhanced staff hand hygiene, and environmental cleaning terminated the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate infection control practices, nursery overcrowding, and understaffing can have an adverse effect on patient morbidity, mortality rates, and hospital cost.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections/prevention & control , Salmonella enterica , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...