Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1104659, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36923436

ABSTRACT

Background: In the context of personalized medicine, screening patients to identify targetable molecular alterations is essential for therapeutic decisions such as inclusion in clinical trials, early access to therapies, or compassionate treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the real-world impact of routine incorporation of FoundationOne analysis in cancers with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, or in those progressing after at least one course of standard therapy. Methods: A FoundationOneCDx panel for solid tumor or liquid biopsy samples was offered to 204 eligible patients. Results: Samples from 150 patients were processed for genomic testing, with a data acquisition success rate of 93%. The analysis identified 2419 gene alterations, with a median of 11 alterations per tumor (range, 0-86). The most common or likely pathogenic variants were on TP53, TERT, PI3KCA, CDKN2A/B, KRAS, CCDN1, FGF19, FGF3, and SMAD4. The median tumor mutation burden was three mutations/Mb (range, 0-117) in 143 patients with available data. Of 150 patients with known or likely pathogenic actionable alterations, 13 (8.6%) received matched targeted therapy. Sixty-nine patients underwent Molecular Tumor Board, which resulted in recommendations in 60 cases. Treatment with genotype-directed therapy had no impact on overall survival (13 months vs. 14 months; p = 0.95; hazard ratio = 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-2.26)]. Conclusions: This study highlights that an organized center with a Multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board and an NGS screening system can obtain satisfactory results comparable with those of large centers for including patients in clinical trials.

2.
In Vivo ; 34(5): 2873-2881, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871827

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the impact of body composition on morbidity and mortality at the initial diagnosis of localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with overweight or obesity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sarcopenia was defined using sex-specific cut-off points and other body composition parameters by median values with computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: Among the 96 patients, 40 had sarcopenia (43.0%) at diagnosis. Body composition had no effect on morbidity and 5-year disease-free survival contrary to the classic factors (p<0.05). In the subgroup of obese patients, those with sarcopenia had a poor prognosis (p=0.04) but not in the population with overweight (p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia was frequently associated with localised RCC at the initial diagnosis. Body composition did not affect morbidity or outcomes. BMI was involved in morbidity and there was paradoxically longer survival in the obesity group.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Sarcopenia , Body Composition , Body Mass Index , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/complications , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/pathology , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , Overweight/pathology , Prognosis , Sarcopenia/complications , Sarcopenia/diagnostic imaging , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
3.
Med Oncol ; 37(8): 69, 2020 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712771

ABSTRACT

Oral therapies have highly modified cancer patient management and changed hospital practises. We introduce a specific Oral Therapy Centre and retrospectively review information prospectively recorded by co-ordination nurses (CNs) (the DICTO programme). We describe the roles played by CNs in the management of oral cancer therapies at Limoges Dupuytren Hospital between May 2015 and June 2018. All cancers, irrespective of stage or whether oral general chemotherapy or targeted therapy was prescribed, are included. We followed up 287 patients of median age 67 years (range 26-89 years). Of these, 76% had metastases and 44% were on first-line therapy. The vast majority (88%) of their first CN contacts occurred just after physician consultation and lasted an average of 60 min. As part of follow-up, the CNs made 2719 calls (average 10 min) to patients to educate them and to verify compliance and drug tolerance. They also received 833 calls from patients (70%) or their relatives or health professionals (30%) seeking advice on management of side effects. In addition to the initial appointments, 1069 non-scheduled follow-up visits were made to assess side effects (49.2%). The CNs devoted 5 h to each patient over 3 months of treatment (i.e. 25 min/day) and, also organised scheduled hospitalisations in the department of oncology for 51% of patients. We show the interest and real-life work in a specific oral therapy centre within oncology department with the role of CNs to facilitate the global health care of the patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/nursing , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasms/pathology , Nurse's Role , Patient Compliance , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...