New dosing nomogram and population pharmacokinetic model for young and very young children receiving busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) is the cornerstone of conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, widely used in both adults and children for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Despite an intravenous formulation, interindividual variability (IIV) remains high and optimal exposure difficult to achieve, especially in neonates and infants. PROCEDURE: To ensure both efficacy and safety, we set up in 2005 an observational study designed for children not fully assessed during the drug registration procedure. From a large cohort of 540 patients, we developed a Bu population pharmacokinetic model based on body weight (BW) and maturation concepts to reduce IIV and optimize exposure. A new dosing nomogram was evaluated to better fit the population pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Bu clearance IIV was significantly decreased from 61.3% (covariate-free model) to 28.6% when combining BW and maturation function. Median Bu area under the curve (AUC) was 1179 µmol/L × min compared to 1025 with the EMA dosing nomogram for children <9 kg. The target AUC was reached for each BW strata, significantly increasing the percentages of patients achieving reaching the targeted AUC as compared to FDA schedule. CONCLUSION: This new model made it possible to propose a novel dosing nomogram that better considered children below 16 kg of BW and allowed better initial exposure as compared to existing dosing schedules. This nomogram, which would be easy to use to determine an optimal dosing schedule in daily practice, will need to be validated in clinical routine. Therapeutic drug monitoring remains strongly advisable for small children and those with specific diseases.

Randomized, double-blind trial of F14512, a polyamine-vectorized anticancer drug, compared with etoposide phosphate, in dogs with naturally occurring lymphoma.

Purpose: F14512 is an epipodophyllotoxin derivative from etoposide, combined with a spermine moiety introduced as a cell delivery vector. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and antitumor activity of F14512 and etoposide phosphate in dogs with spontaneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and to investigate the potential benefit of F14512 in P-glycoprotein (Pgp) overexpressing lymphomas. Experimental Design: Forty-eight client-owned dogs with intermediate to high-grade NHL were enrolled into a randomized, double-blind trial of F14512 versus etoposide phosphate. Endpoints included safety and therapeutic efficacy. Results: Twenty-five dogs were randomized to receive F14512 and 23 dogs to receive etoposide phosphate. All adverse events (AEs) were reversible, and no treatment-related death was reported. Hematologic AEs were more severe with F14512 and gastrointestinal AEs were more frequent with etoposide phosphate. F14512 exhibited similar response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) as etoposide phosphate in the global treated population. Subgroup analysis of dogs with Pgp-overexpressing NHL showed a significant improvement in PFS in dogs treated with F14512 compared with etoposide phosphate. Conclusion: F14512 showed strong therapeutic efficacy against spontaneous NHL and exhibited a clinical benefice in Pgp-overexpressing lymphoma superior to etoposide phosphate. The results clearly justify the evaluation of F14512 in human clinical trials.

A randomised, multicentre open-label phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin in Chinese patients with chemotherapy-naive unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral or intravenous vinorelbine (VRL) plus cisplatin (CDDP) in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one patients were randomised to oral VRL 60 mg/m2 (arm A) or intravenous VRL 25 mg/m2 (arm B) on days 1 and 8, plus CDDP 80 mg/m2 on day 1 (both arms). VRL was increased to 80 mg/m2 (arm A) or 30 mg/m2 (arm B) in cycles 2-4 in the absence of toxicity. Primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). VRL pharmacokinetics was evaluated for possible drug-drug interactions with CDDP. RESULTS: ORR was 25.8% in arm A and 23.1% in arm B. Disease control rate was 72.7% in arm A, 72.3% in arm B. Median overall survival was 16.1 months in arm A and 19.0 months in arm B. Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months in arm A and 4.9 months in arm B. Forty-three point nine percent and 86.2% of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia in arms A and B, respectively; incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (6.1% and 9.2%, respectively). Frequency of grade 3/4 non-haematological adverse events was also low. VRL pharmacokinetics was not affected by co-administration of CDDP. CONCLUSIONS: Oral and intravenous VRL in combination with CDDP is effective and well-tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC. VRL pharmacokinetics is unaffected by CDDP co-administration. Oral VRL could be an effective alternative to intravenous VRL as a first-line treatment for NSCLC, as it optimises treatment convenience while maintaining high efficacy.

Effect of ethnicity on vinorelbine pharmacokinetics: a population pharmacokinetics analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine is mainly known from studies conducted in European patients. Interethnic differences in drug disposition may, however, induce interethnic variation in drug exposure. This paper aimed to evaluate the effect of ethnicity on the bioavailability and clearance of oral and intravenous vinorelbine. METHODS: Oral and intravenous vinorelbine pharmacokinetics data in Asian patients were pooled from two-phase II studies of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer or advanced breast cancer in China. Blood vinorelbine and its active metabolite, 4'-O-deacetylvinorelbine, were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and vinorelbine monotherapy results (intravenous 25 mg/m2; oral 60 mg/m2) of the Asian data set were compared to a reference European data set (intravenous 30 mg/m2; oral 80 mg/m2). Subsequently, a population pharmacokinetics analysis was conducted in a combined cohort (Asian data set + historical vinorelbine pharmacokinetics database) to investigate for a potential effect of ethnicity. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics data from the Asian data set (oral: n = 47; intravenous: n = 34) was compared to the European reference data set (oral: n = 48; intravenous: n = 48). Mean apparent clearance of oral vinorelbine and mean absolute clearance of intravenous vinorelbine was comparable between the Asian and reference European data set. A population pharmacokinetic analysis (oral: n = 222; intravenous: n = 111) demonstrated no influence of ethnicity on oral and intravenous vinorelbine bioavailability and clearance. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were found to be comparable between Asian and European patients. No relevant influence of ethnicity on vinorelbine bioavailability and clearance for oral and intravenous routes of administration was observed.

Phase I dose-escalation study of F14512, a polyamine-vectorized topoisomerase II inhibitor, in patients with platinum-refractory or resistant ovarian cancer.

Purpose To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of F14512, a topoisomerase II inhibitor designed to target cancer cells through the polyamine transport system, (three-hour daily infusion given for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks) in platinum-refractory or resistant ovarian cancer. Other objectives were safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), PK/pharmacodynamics relationship, and efficacy. Methods This was an open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter phase I study. Results Eleven patients were enrolled and were treated at dose levels (DLs) of 10 and 5 mg/m2/day. All patients received the 3 injections per cycle as per study protocol (median, 1 cycle (Ferlay et al. Int J Cancer 136:E359-386, 2015; Siegel et al. CA Cancer J Clin 65:5-29, 2015; Oronsky et al. Med Oncol 34:103, 2017; Barret et al. Cancer Res 68:9845-9853, 2008; Ballot et al. Apoptosis 17:364-376, 2012; Brel et al. Biochem Pharmacol 82:1843-1852, 2011; Gentry et al. Biochemistry 50:3240-3249, 2011; Kruczynski et al. Investig New Drugs 29:9-21, 2011; Chelouah et al. PLoS One 6:e23597, 2011)) with no dose reductions. At DL 10 mg/m2/day, 6 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported (3/4 evaluable patients: 2 grade 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 7 days, 1 grade 3 nausea, 1 decreased appetite, and 1 grade 3 asthenia). At dose 5 mg/m2/day, 2 DLTs were reported (2/6 treated patients: 2 grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Both DLs were defined as MTD. Stable disease was reported as best overall response in 2 (40%) patients having both received 9 cycles, one at each DL. 90.9% of patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia, but for only one (9.1%) it was reported as a serious adverse event. Conclusion Although there was some encouraging efficacy signal, grade 4 neutropenia led to complications and it was decided to stop the study. A DL below 5 mg/m2/day was not tested as this would not allow reaching the minimum serum concentration needed for the pharmacological activity of the drug.

Better characterization of vinflunine pharmacokinetics variability and exposure/toxicity relationship to improve its use: Analyses from 18 trials.

AIMS: Vinflunine is a novel tubulin-targeted inhibitor indicated as a single agent for the treatment of bladder cancers after failure of prior platinum-based therapy. Its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) have been independently characterized through several phase I and phase II studies. However, no global pharmacometric analysis had been conducted as yet. METHODS: Vinflunine concentrations and safety data from 18 phase I and phase II studies were used to conduct population PK and PK/PD analysis, using Nonmem. A four-compartment model was used to describe vinflunine PK and several covariates were tested to explain interindividual variability. In terms of PK/PD relationship, a semiphysiological population PK/PD model was applied to describe time course of absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) after vinflunine administration and logistic regression models were used to test the relationship between vinflunine exposure and toxicities. RESULTS: Vinflunine clearance is explained by creatinine clearance, body surface area and combination with PEGylated doxorubicin, leading to a decrease from 28.2 to 25.3% of the interindividual variability. When vinflunine dose is decreased, simulations of ANC time course (via a semiphysiological model) after vinflunine administration show a risk of neutropenia grade 3-4 at cycle 2 always lower than when dose is delayed. As an example, for moderate renal impaired patients, the risk is 42.1% when vinflunine is dosed at 320 mg m-2 once every 4 weeks vs. 23.3% for 280 mg m-2 once every 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We propose for the first time a global comprehensive clinical pharmacological analysis for intravenous vinflunine that may help drive dose adjustment.

Phase I Clinical Pharmacology Study of F14512, a New Polyamine-Vectorized Anticancer Drug, in Naturally Occurring Canine Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: F14512 is a new topoisomerase II inhibitor containing a spermine moiety that facilitates selective uptake by tumor cells and increases topoisomerase II poisoning. F14512 is currently in a phase I/II clinical trial in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The aim of this study was to investigate F14512 potential in a new clinical indication. Because of the many similarities between human and dog lymphomas, we sought to determine the tolerance, efficacy, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of F14512 in this indication, and potential biomarkers that could be translated into human trials. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-three dogs with stage III-IV naturally occurring lymphomas were enrolled in the phase I dose-escalation trial, which consisted of three cycles of F14512 i.v. injections. Endpoints included safety and therapeutic efficacy. Serial blood samples and tumor biopsies were obtained for PK/PD and biomarker studies. RESULTS: Five dose levels were evaluated to determine the recommended dose. F14512 was well tolerated, with the expected dose-dependent hematologic toxicity. F14512 induced an early decrease of tumoral lymph node cells, and a high response rate of 91% (21/23) with 10 complete responses, 11 partial responses, 1 stable disease, and 1 progressive disease. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX was studied as a potential PD biomarker of F14512. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated that F14512 can be safely administered to dogs with lymphoma resulting in strong therapeutic efficacy. Additional evaluation of F14512 is needed to compare its efficacy with standards of care in dogs, and to translate biomarker and efficacy findings into clinical trials in humans.

New insights into the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children with sickle cell anemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) is an integral part of conditioning regimens for patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) undergoing transplantation. Patients with SCA might predispose to transplant-related neurological and pulmonary toxicities due to pre-existing disease-related cerebrovascular and lung injury. Bu therapy appears to be an important contributing factor in this context. PROCEDURE: We studied the pharmacokinetics of intravenous Bu and clinical outcomes of 36 children with SCA undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Most patients had pre-existing organ system damage. Busulfan was administered every 6 hr for 4 days with pharmacokinetic-guided dose adjustment to target a conservative area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) range of 900-1,350 µMol*min. RESULTS: We found that the first-dose Bu clearance was significantly higher (P < 0.0005) than the subsequent daily clearance, which remained unchanged during the following days. After the first-dose, 69% of patients achieved the target range. We adapted a new dose-adjustment strategy targeting exposures to the lower end (900 µMol*min) of the AUC range after the first dose of Bu to avoid unnecessary dose increases on subsequent days due to differences in clearance. This strategy enabled most patients to maintain the AUC within therapeutic range following dose adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in Bu clearance after the first-dose and subsequent daily doses in patients with SCA should be considered for pharmacokinetic-guided dose adjustment. Conservative AUC range and targeting exposures to the lower end of the range after the first dose was associated with negligible toxicity, and high engraftment and sickle cell-free survival rates.

How to manage intravenous vinflunine in cancer patients with renal impairment: results of a pharmacokinetic and tolerability phase I study.

AIMS: Vinflunine (VFL) ditartrate, a novel tubulin-targeted inhibitor, is registered for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial transitional cell carcinoma. This phase I study assessed the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of VFL. METHODS: VFL was infused in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumours once every 3 weeks with anticipated dose reduction on the first cycle stratified according to the creatinine clearance (CLcr ) values. Pharmacokinetic data were collected on the first two cycles in renally impaired patients (CLcr ≤ 60 ml min(-1) ) and were compared with a control cohort of patients (CLcr > 60 ml min(-1) ). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (46-86 years) were treated, 13 in group 1 (40 ml min(-1) ≤ CLcr ≤ 60 ml min(-1) ) and 20 in group 2 (20 ml min(-1) ≤ CLcr < 40 ml min(-1) ). The renal dysfunction induced a mean decrease in VFL clearance of 12% in group 1 and 28% in group 2, compared with the control group. The anticipated dose reduction given in renally impaired patients (i.e. 280 mg m(-2) and 250 mg m(-2) in groups 1 and 2, respectively) yielded similar drug exposure to control patients. The tolerance profile of VFL in patients with renal dysfunction was similar to that observed in patients with CLcr > 60 ml min(-1) . CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the recommended doses of intravenous VFL administered once every 3 weeks in cancer patients with renal impairment are 280 mg m(-2) when CLcr is between 40 and 60 ml min(-1) and 250 mg m(-2) when CLcr is between 20 and <40 ml min(-1) .

Pharmacokinetic behavior and appraisal of intravenous busulfan dosing in infants and older children: the results of a population pharmacokinetic study from a large pediatric cohort undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) busulfan (Bu) dosing approved in Europe based on 5 body weight (BW) strata has been validated for targeting Bu exposures in children undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and with mostly malignant diseases. The authors conducted an observational study aiming to investigate the behavior and ontogeny of IV Bu pharmacokinetic (PK) disposition, and to reevaluate the consistency of the BW-based dosing in very young children with rare diseases. METHODS: The observational study comprised 115 patients, mostly infants with immunodeficiencies and metabolic inherited disorders and with altered liver function and/or iron overload. Additional data (90 children, mostly malignant diseases) were pooled with the first data set. The overall data (205 children aged from 10 days to 15 years) were analyzed using population PK modeling. RESULTS: The BW remained the main determinant of IV Bu PK, and no further covariate effect was identified. Bu clearance (CL) variability was best described by BW allometric functions. Increase of drug CL with the child's growth was faster in younger children. This pattern is likely related to the maturation of GSTA1 enzymes during infancy and was accounted for in the model by estimating a higher BW allometric exponent in children <9 kg compared with that in children ≥9 kg. IV Bu PK was not modified in children with altered liver function and/or iron overload, and no disease specific difference was observed. Bu dosing either adjusted according to the final model or with the approved EU labeling yields similar targeting performances. For both dosing strategies, the percent of patients achieving the therapeutic area under the curve window (900-1500 µmole·min/L were 60% and 70%-90% in children <9 and ≥9 kg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A population PK model accounting for the highest Bu CL in the youngest patients was validated on training and evaluation data sets. The BW-based dosing strategy recommended in Europe proved to be consistent on a large paediatric cohort representative of the population heterogeneity observed in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of imatinib in children and adults.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of several demographic, biological, and pharmacogenetic covariates on the disposition of imatinib and its main metabolite (CGP74588) in both adults and children. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-three children with solid malignancies included in a phase II exploratory study and 34 adults with gastrointestinal stromal tumors received 340 mg/m(2) and 400 mg imatinib, respectively. Plasma imatinib and CGP74588 concentrations observed on day 1 and at steady-state were analyzed by a population pharmacokinetic method (NONMEM) to evaluate the effect of age, body weight, age, sex, albuminemia, plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), and eight polymorphisms corresponding to ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and AGP (pharmacogenetic data available for 46 of 67 patients). RESULTS: Analysis of the whole data set in 67 patients showed that apparent clearance (CL/F) of imatinib was positively correlated with body weight and albuminemia and negatively with AGP. By considering these three covariates, the interindividual variability on CL/F decreased from 47% to 19%. The apparent clearance of CGP74588 was similarly dependent on both body weight and AGP and significantly lower (30% reduction) at steady-state. By adding genotype status to the final covariate imatinib model, a 22% reduction in CL/F was observed in heterozygous compared with wild-type patients corresponding to ABCG2 c.421C>A (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By considering morphologic and biological covariates, a unique covariate model could be used to accurately describe imatinib pharmacokinetics in patients ages 2 to 84 years. Morphologic and biological characteristics have a stronger influence than pharmacogenetics on imatinib pharmacokinetics.

[Anticancer drug dose individualisation: from body surface area to physiology]. / Pourquoi individualiser les doses de médicaments anticancéreux: de la surface corporelle à la physiologie.

The doses of anticancer drugs are usually calculated according to the body surface area. This practice is based on the hypothesis that clearance is proportional to this morphologic parameter. That is rarely true, thus the pharmacodynamic effects (particularly haematological toxicity) are often better correlated with plasma drug concentrations than with doses. The elimination pathways of anticancer drugs will be presented, together with their main sources of interindividual variability. Methods of estimation of renal function will be discussed. These pharmacokinetic concepts allow understanding new alternative methods for individual dosing in oncology.