Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
2.
Endocr Pract ; 26(Suppl 1): 1-46, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427503

ABSTRACT

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2020 updated guideline contains 52 recommendations: 21 Grade A (40%), 24 Grade B (46%), 7 Grade C (14%), and no Grade D (0%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 368 citations: 123 (33.5%) evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 132 (36%) EL 2 (intermediate), 20 (5.5%) EL 3 (weak), and 93 (25%) EL 4 (lowest). New or updated topics in this CPG include: clarification of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, stratification of the patient according to high-risk and very-high-risk features, a new dual-action therapy option, and transitions from therapeutic options. Conclusion: This guideline is a practical tool for endocrinologists, physicians in general, regulatory bodies, health-related organizations, and interested laypersons regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Abbreviations: 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AFF = atypical femoral fracture; ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BTM = bone turnover marker; CI = confidence interval; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CTX = C-terminal telopeptide type-I collagen; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; FRAX® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; GI = gastrointestinal; HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic acid ONce yearly Pivotal Fracture Trial (zoledronic acid and zoledronate are equivalent terms); ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; IU = international units; IV = intravenous; LSC = least significant change; NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation; ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw; PINP = serum amino-terminal propeptide of type-I collagen; PTH = parathyroid hormone; R = recommendation; ROI = region of interest; RR = relative risk; SD = standard deviation; TBS = trabecular bone score; VFA = vertebral fracture assessment; WHO = World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Bone Density , Endocrinologists , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , United States
3.
Endocr Pract ; 26(5): 564-570, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427525

ABSTRACT

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2020 updated guideline contains 52 recommendations: 21 Grade A (40%), 24 Grade B (46%), 7 Grade C (14%), and no Grade D (0%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 368 citations: 123 (33.5%) evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 132 (36%) EL 2 (intermediate), 20 (5.5%) EL 3 (weak), and 93 (25%) EL 4 (lowest). New or updated topics in this CPG include: clarification of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, stratification of the patient according to high-risk and very-high-risk features, a new dual-action therapy option, and transitions from therapeutic options. Conclusion: This guideline is a practical tool for endocrinologists, physicians in general, regulatory bodies, health-related organizations, and interested laypersons regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Aged , Endocrinologists , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , United States
4.
Endocr Pract ; 25(7): 729-765, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31070950

ABSTRACT

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) has created a transculturalized diabetes chronic disease care model that is adapted for patients across a spectrum of ethnicities and cultures. AACE has conducted several transcultural activities on global issues in clinical endocrinology and completed a 3-city series of conferences in December 2017 that focused on diabetes care for ethnic minorities in the U.S. Proceedings from the "Diabetes Care Across America" series of transcultural summits are presented here. Information from community leaders, practicing health care professionals, and other stakeholders in diabetes care is analyzed according to biological and environmental factors. Four specific U.S. ethnicities are detailed: African Americans, Latino/Hispanics, Asian Americans, and Native Americans. A core set of recommendations to culturally adapt diabetes care is presented that emphasizes culturally appropriate terminology, transculturalization of white papers, culturally adapting clinic infrastructure, flexible office hours, behavioral medicine-especially motivational interviewing and building trust-culturally competent nutritional messaging and health literacy, community partnerships for care delivery, technology innovation, clinical trial recruitment and retention of ethnic minorities, and more funding for scientific studies on epigenetic mechanisms of cultural impact on disease expression. It is hoped that through education, research, and clinical practice enhancements, diabetes care can be optimized in terms of precision and clinical outcomes for the individual and U.S. population as a whole.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Endocrinology , Asian , Endocrinologists , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Societies, Medical , United States
5.
Endocr Pract ; 24(2): 220-229, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29466058

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: High-quality dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans are necessary for accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of therapy; however, DXA scan reports may contain errors that cause confusion about diagnosis and treatment. This American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus statement was generated to draw attention to many common technical problems affecting DXA report conclusions and provide guidance on how to address them to ensure that patients receive appropriate osteoporosis care. METHODS: The DXA Writing Committee developed a consensus based on discussion and evaluation of available literature related to osteoporosis and osteodensitometry. RESULTS: Technical errors may include errors in scan acquisition and/or analysis, leading to incorrect diagnosis and reporting of change over time. Although the International Society for Clinical Densitometry advocates training for technologists and medical interpreters to help eliminate these problems, many lack skill in this technology. Suspicion that reports are wrong arises when clinical history is not compatible with scan interpretation (e.g., dramatic increase/decrease in a short period of time; declines in previously stable bone density after years of treatment), when different scanners are used, or when inconsistent anatomic sites are used for monitoring the response to therapy. Understanding the concept of least significant change will minimize erroneous conclusions about changes in bone density. CONCLUSION: Clinicians must develop the skills to differentiate technical problems, which confound reports, from real biological changes. We recommend that clinicians review actual scan images and data, instead of relying solely on the impression of the report, to pinpoint errors and accurately interpret DXA scan images. ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; BMC = bone mineral content; BMD = bone mineral density; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; LSC = least significant change; TBS = trabecular bone score; WHO = World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/standards , Consensus , Data Accuracy , Endocrinology/standards , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Bone Density , Endocrinologists/organization & administration , Endocrinologists/standards , Endocrinology/organization & administration , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Research Report/standards , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , United States , X-Ray Film/standards
6.
Surgery ; 161(1): 107-115, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27842919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the outcome of bone disease of primary hyperparathyroidism differs in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated disease and sporadic hyperparathyroidism at 1-year postoperatively. METHODS: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/hyperparathyroidism and sporadic hyperparathyroidism patients who underwent parathyroidectomy from 1990 to 2013 and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 1-year postoperatively were included. Preoperative and postoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements (bone mineral density and Z-score at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck) were analyzed. RESULTS: We evaluated 14 multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/hyperparathyroidism and 104 sporadic hyperparathyroidism patients. The preoperative Z-scores at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were lower in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/hyperparathyroidism group (P = .05, P = .04, and P = .0081, respectively). Comparison of preoperative and postoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements demonstrated that the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/hyperparathyroidism group had a significantly higher Z-score at the lumbar spine (P = .02) at 1 year after operation, whereas the sporadic hyperparathyroidism group had a significantly higher Z-score at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck (P < .0001, P = .0004, and P = .0001) and higher bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Long-term monitoring of these patients using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is required to assess outcomes and facilitate decisions on the timing of operative intervention.


Subject(s)
Bone Remodeling/physiology , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/surgery , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/surgery , Parathyroidectomy/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Bone Density , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/diagnosis , Postoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Endocr Pract ; 22(Suppl 4): 1-42, 2016 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27662240

ABSTRACT

ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists AFF = atypical femur fracture ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research BEL = best evidence level BMD = bone mineral density BTM = bone turnover marker CBC = complete blood count CI = confidence interval DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry EL = evidence level FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration FLEX = Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long-term Extension FRAX® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool GFR = glomerular filtration rate GI = gastrointestinal HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly IOF = International Osteoporosis Foundation ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry IU = international units IV = intravenous LSC = least significant change NBHA = National Bone Health Alliance NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxy vitamin D ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw PINP = serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I collagen PTH = parathyroid hormone R = recommendation RANK = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand RCT = randomized controlled trial RR = relative risk S-CTX = serum C-terminal telopeptide SQ = subcutaneous VFA = vertebral fracture assessment WHO = World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Endocrinology/standards , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Density , Endocrinologists/standards , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Humans , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/epidemiology , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , United States/epidemiology
8.
Endocr Pract ; 22(9): 1111-8, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27643923

ABSTRACT

ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists AFF = atypical femur fracture ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research BEL = best evidence level BMD = bone mineral density BTM = bone turnover marker CBC = complete blood count CI = confidence interval DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry EL = evidence level FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration FLEX = Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long-term Extension FRAX(®) = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool GFR = glomerular filtration rate GI = gastrointestinal HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly IOF = International Osteoporosis Foundation ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry IU = international units IV = intravenous LSC = least significant change NBHA = National Bone Health Alliance NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxy vitamin D ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw PINP = serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I collagen PTH = parathyroid hormone R = recommendation RANK = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand RCT = randomized controlled trial RR = relative risk S-CTX = serum C-terminal telopeptide SQ = subcutaneous VFA = vertebral fracture assessment WHO = World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density , Collagen Type I/blood , Endocrinology/organization & administration , Endocrinology/standards , Evidence-Based Practice , Humans , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , United States , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/blood
10.
Endocr Pract ; 20(7): 692-702, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25057098

ABSTRACT

In 2010, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) published an update to the original 2004 guidelines. This update hybridized strict evidence-based medicine methods with subjective factors and improved the efficiency of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) production, clinical applicability, and usefulness. Current and persistent shortcomings involving suboptimal implementation and protracted development timelines are addressed in the current 2014 update. The major advances include 1) formulation of an organizational educational strategy, represented by the AACE Council on Education, to address relevant teaching and decision-making tools for clinical endocrinologists, and to generate specific clinical questions to drive CPG, clinical algorithm (CA), and clinical checklist (CC) development; 2) creation and prioritization of printed and online CAs and CCs with a supporting evidence base; 3) focus on clinically relevant and question-oriented topics; 4) utilization of "cascades," where there can be more than 1 recommendation for 1 clinical question; and 5) incorporation of performance metrics to validate, optimize, and effectively update CPG, CAs, and CCs. Efforts continue to translate these clinical tools to electronic formats that can be integrated into a paperless healthcare delivery system, as well as applying them to diverse clinical settings by incorporating transcultural factors.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Checklist , Endocrinology , Humans , Time Factors
13.
J Bone Miner Res ; 28(6): 1243-55, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23553962

ABSTRACT

Concern about the risk of bone loss in astronauts as a result of prolonged exposure to microgravity prompted the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to convene a Bone Summit with a panel of experts at the Johnson Space Center to review the medical data and research evidence from astronauts who have had prolonged exposure to spaceflight. Data were reviewed from 35 astronauts who had served on spaceflight missions lasting between 120 and 180 days with attention focused on astronauts who (1) were repeat fliers on long-duration missions, (2) were users of an advanced resistive exercise device (ARED), (3) were scanned by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the hip, (4) had hip bone strength estimated by finite element modeling, or (5) had lost >10% of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the hip or lumbar spine as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Because of the limitations of DXA in describing the effects of spaceflight on bone strength, the panel recommended that the U.S. space program use QCT and finite element modeling to further study the unique effects of spaceflight (and recovery) on bone health in order to better inform clinical decisions.


Subject(s)
Aerospace Medicine , Astronauts , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Weightlessness/adverse effects , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Diseases/etiology , Bone Diseases/metabolism , Bone Diseases/prevention & control , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Needs Assessment , Time Factors , United States , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
14.
Endocr Pract ; 16(2): 270-83, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20350905

ABSTRACT

In 2004, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) published the "Protocol for Standardized Production of Clinical Practice Guidelines," which was to be implemented in forthcoming clinical practice guidelines (CPG). This protocol formally incorporated subjective factors and evidence-based medicine (EBM) methods that tightly mapped evidence levels to recommendation grades. A uniform publication template and multilevel review process were also outlined. Seven CPG have been subsequently published with use of this 2004 AACE protocol. Recently, growing concerns about the usefulness of CPG have been raised. The purposes of this report are to address shortcomings of the 2004 AACE protocol and to present an updated 2010 AACE protocol for CPG development. AACE CPG are developed without any industry involvement. Multiplicities of interests among writers and reviewers that might compromise the usefulness of CPG are avoided. Three major goals are to (1) balance transparently the effect of rigid quantitative EBM methods with subjective factors, (2) create a less onerous, less time-consuming, and less costly CPG production process, and (3) introduce an electronic implementation component. The updated 2010 AACE protocol emphasizes "informed judgment" and hybridizes EBM descriptors (study design type), qualifiers (study flaws), and subjective factors (such as risk, cost, and relevance). In addition, by focusing on more specific topics and clinical questions, the expert evaluation and multilevel review process is more transparent and expeditious. Lastly, the final recommendations are linked to a new electronic implementation feature.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols/standards , Endocrinology/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Humans , United States
20.
J Clin Densitom ; 9(4): 388-92, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17097522

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of devices to measure bone mineral density (BMD), with large numbers of technologists operating these instruments and numerous physicians interpreting/reporting the results, raises concern regarding the quality of the studies. High quality BMD measurement and reporting is essential, since referring healthcare providers rely on these reports to make patient care decisions that include additional medical evaluation (laboratory or imaging tests), drug therapy (starting, stopping, or changing), and possibly referral to an osteoporosis specialist. Incorrect BMD acquisition or reporting may generate unnecessary medical expenses and result in therapeutic decisions that could be harmful to patients. Contrary to the common misperception that BMD measurement and interpretation is a simple procedure requiring no special expertise, densitometer maintenance/operation, data acquisition, and interpretation/reporting of the results are skills that must be acquired and maintained. We recommend that technologists and clinicians involved with performing or interpreting BMD tests be educated and trained in bone densitometry and that they update their skills regularly. We also suggest that they provide demonstration of proficiency in bone densitometry in order to assure patients, referring healthcare providers, and payers of medical services that these skills have been acquired and maintained.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/standards , Bone Density , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Accreditation , Calibration , Clinical Competence , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Humans , Radiology/education
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...