Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rom J Morphol Embryol ; 63(1): 237-244, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36074690

ABSTRACT

The pure retroperitoneal lipoma is a sporadic benign tumor originating from the mesenchymal tissue. There are only a few data in the literature. The technique available at this moment cannot establish a clear distinction between a benign adipose mass and a low-grade liposarcoma. This study presents the case of a 53-year-old man presenting computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that revealed a giant retroperitoneal fatty tumor of 365∕210∕165 mm dimensions, suspected of malignancy. The patient's medical history, clinical data, and blood tests are more likely inclined to a benign condition. Liposarcoma couldn't be excluded preoperatively. The patient underwent an open surgical procedure respecting the oncological principles, with complete resection of 6400 g of retroperitoneal adipose tumor that also affected the surrounding organs' normal abdominal anatomy. The tumor was relatively well delimited without any signs of local invasion or infiltration. Three solid masses described on the MRI were identified upon dissection and sent separately for histological examination. The result indicated a giant retroperitoneal lipoma with benign characteristics. Facing imagistic difficulties to distinguish lipoma from liposarcoma clearly, and the inconclusiveness of fine-needle biopsies, oncological resection remains the only option as a diagnostic method and curative treatment.


Subject(s)
Lipoma , Liposarcoma , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms , Humans , Lipoma/diagnostic imaging , Lipoma/surgery , Liposarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Liposarcoma/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Rom J Morphol Embryol ; 58(2): 339-350, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28730217

ABSTRACT

Since they were described, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are, for pathologists and not only for them, a subject of controversy regarding histological origin, differentiation, nomenclature, malignant potential and prognosis. Before 1998, there were no certainties that GISTs were fundamentally different from other types of abdominal cancers in the big family of mesenchymal tumors. Before the discovery of KIT gene mutations, GISTs were most often classified as leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, leiomyoblastoma, and gastrointestinal autonomic nerve tumor. When a tumor is discovered, the first data obtained are initially assessed by one or more imaging tests, such as an ultrasound, computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging. The imaging results define the size of the lesion and its anatomic location, which in the case of GIST is usually within the wall of the stomach or intestine. Depending on the experience of the medical team - radiologist, gastroenterologist or surgeon - reviewing the imagistic tests and correlating them with the general patient profile, the differential diagnostic is reduced and GIST may become the main suspect.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/genetics , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Female , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Male , Prognosis
3.
Rom J Morphol Embryol ; 58(2): 619-625, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28730252

ABSTRACT

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare condition so there are relatively few and small case series and no prospective studies to provide clear guidelines regarding management. We report on a case that presents some particularities that further underline diagnostic and treatment difficulties posed by the affliction of such a rare tumor. This is the case of a 43-year-old woman who had a large tumor arising from the uterus, with a spectacular growth rate over a short period. The patient, with congenital spastic tetraparesis and hydrocephalus, came for belly enlargement with rapid increase in size over the previous two months. Physical exam and ultrasound lead to the conclusion of a large abdominal mass. A computed tomography scan showed a mass arising from the pelvis and a large amount of ascites. An exploratory laparotomy was performed and the histopathology report confirmed the diagnosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Leiomyosarcoma poses challenging problems regarding histological grading and, due to its rate of growth, real surgical difficulties. Final diagnosis is done by histopathological examination after surgical excision. Frequently, it is late diagnosed when complete removal of the tumor is often impossible.


Subject(s)
Immunohistochemistry/methods , Leiomyosarcoma , Adult , Female , Humans , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnosis , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , Leiomyosarcoma/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...