Treating Evangelical Christians: Challenges and Opportunities.

Evangelical Christians constitute one-quarter of the U.S. population and can present challenges to mental health treatment, such as beliefs that psychiatric problems result from personal sin and that secular professionals pose a threat to their faith. Understanding the origins of the tensions between evangelical faith and psychiatric practice as well as the interrelated nature of many evangelical Christians' emotional and spiritual lives can help clinicians understand how to more effectively treat this population. Strategies that build on common ground provide opportunities for establishing trust and navigating differing viewpoints.

The Moral Dimension of Mental Health Treatment.

Patients regularly bring value-laden concerns to treatment, but clinicians are often unsure about what role to play in their patients' moral lives. Addressing problems in moral functioning depends on assessing how individuals are accomplishing basic moral tasks: developing moral commitments, making moral decisions, implementing these decisions, assessing the correspondence between their ideals and behavior, dealing effectively with moral failure, and developing morally admirable character traits, or virtues. Clarity about the moral dimension of clinical work is important for shaping the direction of treatment, achieving clinical aims, and engaging the moral challenges that clinicians face.

Institutional Transference in Serious Illness Care.

Institutional transference is a phenomenon describing patients' attitudes toward the institutions where they receive mental health or medical care. While transference toward individual clinicians in palliative care has been described, attitudes of patients with serious illness toward the institutions where they receive specialized care have not been described. Here, we present three cases which demonstrate the phenomenon of institutional transference in patients with serious illness and the resulting clinical implications, which include countertransferential responses of clinicians caring for them. We consider three conditions: (1) the idealized reputation of the academic cancer center, often a tertiary referral center; (2) loss of an institutional connection during care transitions; and (3) countertransferential reactions to institutional transference. We highlight characteristics and personality styles of individuals with cancer that may complicate and intensify institutional transference and identify potential interventions to address common challenges associated with institutional transference.

Disruption as an opportunity or threat: A qualitative analysis of factors influencing the attitudes of experts in serious illness care toward psychedelic-assisted therapies.

BACKGROUND: Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PAT) are emerging as a promising treatment for psycho-existential distress in patients with serious illness. A recent qualitative analysis of perspectives of 17 experts in serious illness care and/or PAT research identified divergent views on the therapeutic potential and safety of PAT in patients with serious illness. This paper further analyzes the factors that may influence these views. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors underlying the attitudes of experts in serious illness care and/or PAT toward PAT and its potential role in serious illness care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of 17 experts in serious illness care and/or PAT from the United States and Canada were analyzed to identify factors cited as influencing their views on PAT. RESULTS: Five factors were identified as influencing experts' attitudes toward PAT: perception of unmet need, knowledge of empirical studies of PAT, personal experience with psychedelics, professional background, and age/generation. In addition, an integrative theme emerged from the analysis, namely PAT's disruptive potential at 4 levels relevant to serious illness care: patient's experience of self, illness, and death; relationships with loved ones and health-care providers; existing clinical models of serious illness care; and societal attitudes toward death. Whether this disruptive potential was viewed as a therapeutic opportunity, or an undue risk, was central in influencing experts' level of support. Experts' perception of this disruptive potential was directly influenced by the 5 identified factors. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Points of disruption potentially invoked by PAT in serious illness care highlight important practical and philosophical considerations when working to integrate PAT into serious illness care delivery in a safe and effective way.

The virtues in psychiatric treatment.

Virtues, understood as excellent character traits, originally defined human flourishing, but have been historically neglected within psychiatric practice. Reasons include concerns about scientific objectivity, realistic expectations, and therapeutic moralism. Renewed interest in their clinical relevance has been spurred by problems in sustaining professionalism, growing attention to virtue ethics, empirical support for the benefits of virtues such as gratitude, and the emergence of a fourth wave of growth promoting therapies. Increasing evidence supports the incorporation of a virtues based perspective into diagnostic assessment, goal-setting, and treatment.

Accountability as a virtue in medicine: from theory to practice.

Accountability is a norm basic to several aspects of medical practice. We explore here the benefits of a more explicit focus on the virtue of accountability, which as distinct from the state of being held accountable, entails both welcoming responsibility to others and welcoming input from others. Practicing accountably can limit moral distress caused by institutional pressures on the doctor patient relationship. Fostering a mindset that is welcoming rather than resistant to feedback is critical to enhancing a culture of learning. Analysis of failures of accountable practice offers opportunities for improving the delivery of clinical care.

Teaching Spiritual and Religious Competencies to Psychiatry Residents: A Scoping and Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: For many persons worldwide, mental health is inseparably linked with spirituality and religion (S&R), yet psychiatrists have repeatedly expressed doubts regarding their preparedness to address patients' spirituality or religion appropriately. In recent decades, medical educators have developed and implemented curricula for teaching S&R-related competencies to psychiatry residents. The authors reviewed the literature to understand the scope and effectiveness of these educational initiatives. METHOD: The authors searched 8 databases to identify studies for a scoping review and a systematic review. The scoping review explored educational approaches (topics, methods) used in psychiatry residency programs to teach S&R-related competencies. The systematic review examined changes in psychiatry trainees' competencies and/or in patient outcomes following exposure to these educational interventions. RESULTS: Twelve studies met criteria for inclusion in the scoping review. All reported providing residents with both (1) a general overview of the intersections between mental health and S&R and (2) training in relevant interviewing and assessment skills. Seven of these studies-representing an estimated 218 postgraduate psychiatry trainees and at least 84 patients-were included in the systematic review. Residents generally rated themselves as being more competent in addressing patients' S&R-related concerns following the trainings. One randomized controlled trial found that patients with severe mental illness who were treated by residents trained in S&R-related competencies attended more appointments than control patients. CONCLUSIONS: S&R-related educational interventions appeared generally well tolerated and appreciated by psychiatry trainees and their patients; however, some topics (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) received infrequent emphasis, and some experiential teaching methodologies (e.g., attending chaplaincy rounds) were less frequently used for psychiatry residents than for medical students. The positive association between teaching S&R-related competencies to psychiatry residents and patient appointment attendance merits further study. Future trainings should supplement classroom learning with experiential approaches and incorporate objective measures of resident competence.

Approaching Identity Problems Common in Clinical Practice.

ABSTRACT: The concept of identity is pervasive in psychology and culture, but clinicians have lacked a conceptual framework for addressing problems related to identity. After reviewing the development of identity, I distinguish four of the most common categories of such problems and consider approaches to each: identity diffusion, distorted identity, threats to identity, and difficulty integrating disparate aspects of one's identity. While making identity a focus of clinical attention can strengthen the alliance and place the treatment within a larger context, doing so raises moral questions about the clinician's role as an agent of validation or change.

Assessing Religious Commitment in a Multicultural Inpatient Setting: A Psychometric Evaluation of the 10-item Belief into Action Scale.

Religious and spiritual (R/S) issues impact medical decision-making, particularly among highly R/S populations, for whom existing measures have limitations in identifying levels of R/S commitment. The Belief into Action (BIAc) scale was designed for this purpose and was never tested among hospitalized patients. We interviewed 152 patients (51% men) with a mean age of 48.9 years (SD = 15.2), having either cancer (27%), cardiovascular (26%), rheumatic (21%), or other diseases (26%). Cronbach alpha was .82 and a 3-factor structure (subjective, social, and private religious commitment) was the most robust. Results suggest the BIAc has adequate convergent, divergent, and incremental validity compared to other well-established questionnaires and is appropriate for the inpatient setting.

Religiosity and spirituality in psychiatry residency programs: why, what, and how to teach?

OBJECTIVE: To propose a core curriculum for religiosity and spirituality (R/S) in clinical practice for psychiatry residency programs based on the available evidence. METHODS: After performing a review of studies on the implementation of R/S curricula and identifying the most commonly taught topics and teaching methods, an R/S curriculum was developed based on the most prevalent strategies, as well as recommendations from psychiatric associations, resulting in a fairly comprehensive R/S curriculum that is simple enough to be easily implemented, even where there is a shortage of time and of faculty expertise. RESULTS: The curriculum is a twelve-hour course (six 2-hour sessions). The topics include: concepts and evidence regarding R/S and mental health relationships, taking a spiritual history/case formulation, historical aspects and research, main local R/S traditions, differential diagnosis between spiritual experiences and mental disorders, and R/S integration in the approach to treatment. The teaching methods include: classes, group discussions, studying guidelines, taking spiritual histories, panels, field visits, case presentations, and clinical supervision. The evaluation of residents includes: taking a spiritual history and formulating an R/S case. The program evaluation includes: quantitative and qualitative written feedback. CONCLUSIONS: A brief and feasible core R/S curriculum for psychiatry residency programs is proposed; further investigation of the impact of this educational intervention is needed.

Burnout in psychosocial oncology clinicians: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined burnout in psychosocial oncology clinicians. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize what is known about the prevalence and severity of burnout in psychosocial clinicians who work in oncology settings and the factors that are believed to contribute or protect against it. METHOD: Articles on burnout (including compassion fatigue and secondary trauma) in psychosocial oncology clinicians were identified by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Web of Science Core Collection. RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles were reviewed at the full-text level, and of those, nine met study inclusion criteria. All were published between 2004 and 2018 and included data from 678 psychosocial clinicians. Quality assessment revealed relatively low risk of bias and high methodological quality. Study composition and sample size varied greatly, and the majority of clinicians were aged between 40 and 59 years. Across studies, 10 different measures were used to assess burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion fatigue, in addition to factors that might impact burnout, including work engagement, meaning, and moral distress. When compared with other medical professionals, psychosocial oncology clinicians endorsed lower levels of burnout. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This systematic review suggests that psychosocial clinicians are not at increased risk of burnout compared with other health care professionals working in oncology or in mental health. Although the data are quite limited, several factors appear to be associated with less burnout in psychosocial clinicians, including exposure to patient recovery, discussing traumas, less moral distress, and finding meaning in their work. More research using standardized measures of burnout with larger samples of clinicians is needed to examine both prevalence rates and how the experience of burnout changes over time. By virtue of their training, psychosocial clinicians are well placed to support each other and their nursing and medical colleagues.

Religiosity, spirituality, suicide risk and remission of depressive symptoms: a 6-month prospective study of tertiary care Brazilian patients.

Religiosity and spirituality (R/S) are increasingly recognized as significant aspects in the evaluation of depressed patients. Limited research, however, has investigated the impact of R/S on outcomes of more severe or chronic depressed patients. The present study investigated the impact of different religiosity dimensions in tertiary care Brazilian depressed patients over suicide risk scores measured at baseline and remission of depressive symptoms in a 6-month prospective follow-up. In 277 individuals interviewed, 226 presented a diagnosis of depressive episode and 192 were assessed in the follow-up. Religiosity was evaluated using the Duke University Religion Index, comprising three dimensions of religiosity (organizational religiosity, non-organizational religiosity, intrinsic religiosity). Other potential predictors of outcomes included the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Maudsley Staging of illness (MSM), Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS), World Health Organization Spirituality, Religiousness and Personal Beliefs instrument (WHOQOL-SRPB) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D). Results showed that almost half (46.1%) of the patients reported previous suicide attempts. Linear regression models identified that religious attendance (t-statistic -2.17, P=0.03), intrinsic religiosity (t-statistic -2.42, P=0.01) and WHOQOL-SRPB (t-statistic -3.67, P=0.00) were inversely correlated to suicide risk scores. In a prospective follow-up 16.7 % of patients (n=32/192) achieved remission of depressive symptoms (HAM-D scores ≤7). Religious attendance (OR 1.83, P=0.02) was identified as the main predictor of remission. Findings reinforce the importance of attending to religiosity/spirituality in order to improve outcomes and promote the recovery especially among severely depressed patients with increased suicide risk.

COVID-19 Anxiety.

Growing concerns about anxiety associated with COVID-19 have led to recommendations for effective self-care, and greater availability of mental health treatment. At the same time, existential concerns raised by the pandemic suggest the importance of religious resources, as seen in research into the experience of patients dealing with advanced cancer.

Euthanasia and assisted suicide of persons with psychiatric disorders: the challenge of personality disorders.

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) for psychiatric disorders, legal in some countries, remains controversial. Personality disorders are common in psychiatric EAS. They often cause a sense of irremediable suffering and engender complex patient-clinician interactions, both of which could complicate EAS evaluations. METHODS: We conducted a directed-content analysis of all psychiatric EAS cases involving personality and related disorders published by the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees (N = 74, from 2011 to October 2017). RESULTS: Most patients were women (76%, n = 52), often with long, complex clinical histories: 62% had physical comorbidities, 97% had at least one, and 70% had two or more psychiatric comorbidities. They often had a history of suicide attempts (47%), self-harming behavior (27%), and trauma (36%). In 46%, a previous EAS request had been refused. Past psychiatric treatments varied: e.g. hospitalization and psychotherapy were not tried in 27% and 28%, respectively. In 50%, the physician managing their EAS were new to them, a third (36%) did not have a treating psychiatrist at the time of EAS request, and most physicians performing EAS were non-psychiatrists (70%) relying on cross-sectional psychiatric evaluations focusing on EAS eligibility, not treatment. Physicians evaluating such patients appear to be especially emotionally affected compared with when personality disorders are not present. CONCLUSIONS: The EAS evaluation of persons with personality disorders may be challenging and emotionally complex for their evaluators who are often non-psychiatrists. These factors could influence the interpretation of EAS requirements of irremediability, raising issues that merit further discussion and research.

From disability to human flourishing: how fourth wave psychotherapies can help to reimagine rehabilitation and medicine as a whole.

Aim: With disabled patients, clinicians are often mechanistically oriented, limiting goals to bodily improvements of perceived deficits back to species-typical functioning. Psychological goals, when present at all, are often pessimistically narrow, or phenomenologically shallow. Recent research on fourth wave psychotherapies helps broaden clinical concepts of healing and treatment beyond mere deficit remediation, and helps match clinical goals with the richness of human flourishing and the layered complexity of the patient's evolving experience of meaning.Method: This article draws from first-hand accounts of the experience of disability and adjustment to impairment, along with a synthesis of recent theoretical and experimental work in clinical psychology and psychotherapy, to present recommendations for more accurate and ethical notions of rehabilitation for clinical practice.Results: We explain the clinical value of "flourishing": the psychological, social, cultural, existential, moral, spiritual and religious dimensions of the patient in the context of their dynamic narrative existence in meaningful relationship and ritual formation. This approach allows clinicians to personalize and humanize caregiving in line with human strengths, move beyond an aim of mere recovery, more accurately characterize perceived impairments, goals of care, and successful treatment outcomes. These more capacious and experientially-attuned clinical concepts and aims help the clinician accompany and empower patients by understanding what is at stake throughout the illness experience.Conclusions: This flourishing model helps to reimagine the clinician-patient relationship, and the methods and entire purpose of rehabilitation medicine, and clinical medicine more broadly. The condition of blindness is presented as an illustrative case.Implications for rehabilitationAmidst vast medical and technological advances in diagnosis and treatment of disabilities, modern health systems often still approach rehabilitation of disability via species-typical standards of bodily or mental homeostasis as the standard of sound health, without considering the perspectives and experiences of flourishing that are unique to the individual who is sufferingPsychological, social scientific, and religious traditions uniquely explore the inner experiences of individuals and their relationships, and can be used to help patients find individualized paths to recovery, healing, and flourishingFourth-wave psychotherapies, utilizing existential, humanistic, and spiritual/religious philosophies, have resources clinicians can use to help patients aim beyond mere recovery, and allow for the possibility of "ultrabilitation"Attention to the psychological, social, cultural, existential, moral, spiritual, and religious dimensions of the patient in the context of their dynamic existence can promote ultrabilitationDedicated focus on compassion, virtue, dignity, gratitude, contemplative wisdom, and transcendence can enable one to conceptualize flourishing in a way independent or complementary to bodily outcomes in recovery, and sometimes even when illness or disability persists.

The Physician's Role in Responding to Existential Suffering: What Does It Mean to Comfort Always?

Existential suffering is commonly experienced by patients with serious medical illnesses despite the advances in the treatment of physical and psychological symptoms that often accompany incurable diseases. Palliative care (PC) clinicians wishing to help these patients are faced with many barriers including the inability to identify existential suffering, lack of training in how to address it, and time constraints. Although mental health and spiritual care providers play an instrumental role in addressing the existential needs of patients, PC clinicians are uniquely positioned to coordinate the necessary resources for addressing existential suffering in their patients. With this article, we present a case of a patient in existential distress and a framework to equip PC clinicians to assess and address existential suffering.

Approaching Religiously Reinforced Mental Health Stigma: A Conceptual Framework.

Religious reinforcement of mental health stigma is a widespread obstacle to treatment. Understanding its principal causes-fundamentalist thinking, communal bonding, misattribution of psychopathology, traditional beliefs and healing practices, and adverse experiences with secular providers-is a prerequisite to effective mitigation. This requires a sensitive search for common ground, efforts to work within community values, attempts to address both psychiatric and spiritual concerns, and educational interventions tailored to these challenges. Addressing religious reinforcement through collaboration between providers of psychiatric and spiritual care requires further study.