Utility of C-terminal proendothelin in the early diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction plays a major role in cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, its quantification has not been available as a clinical tool. METHODS: In a prospective international multicentre study, we analyzed the diagnostic and prognostic utility of endothelial dysfunction as quantified by C-terminal proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) in 658 consecutive patients presenting with suspected AMI. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Patients were followed long-term for mortality. RESULTS: The adjudicated final diagnosis was AMI in 145 patients (22%). The diagnostic performance of CT-proET-1 for AMI was moderate; its area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve amounted to 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.72; P < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the AUC when CT-proET-1 was added to either cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT). Seventy four percent of patients who died during the first 24 months (n = 50) were in the fourth quartile of the CT-proET-1 presentation value (>82 pmol/L). The prognostic accuracy of CT-proET-1 regarding mortality was tantamount to that of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and outperformed cTnT and hs-cTnT both in patients with AMI and in patients without acute coronary syndrome. CT-proET-1 at presentation yielded high prognostic accuracy that was similar to that of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores. The TIMI risk score could be significantly improved by adding CT-proET-1 (integrated discriminatory improvement [IDI] of 0.074 P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Use of CT-proET-1 improves risk stratification of unselected patients with suspected AMI. CT-proET-1 did not provide additional diagnostic value.

Determinants of high-sensitivity troponin T among patients with a noncardiac cause of chest pain.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown to what extent noncardiac causes, including renal dysfunction, may contribute to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels. METHODS: In an observational international multicenter study, we enrolled consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Of 1181 patients enrolled, 572 were adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists to have a noncardiac cause of chest pain. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the important predictors of log-transformed high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the prognostic significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T>0.014 µg/L (99th percentile). RESULTS: A total of 88 patients (15%) had high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T>0.014 µg/L. Less than 50% of cardiac troponins could be explained by known cardiac or noncardiac diseases. In decreasing order of importance, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease (adjusted r(2) 0.44) emerged as significant factors in linear regression analysis to predict high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T was best explained by a linear curve with age as ≤0.014 µg/L. Patients with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels>0.014 µg/L were at increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-10.6; P=.02) during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Among the known covariates, age and not renal dysfunction is the most important determinant of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Because known cardiac and noncardiac factors, including renal dysfunction, explain less than 50% of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels among patients with a noncardiac cause of chest pain, unknown or underestimated cardiac involvement during the acute presenting condition seems to be the major cause of elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.

Utility of absolute and relative changes in cardiac troponin concentrations in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), among other criteria, also require a rise and/or fall in cardiac troponin (cTn) levels. It is unknown whether absolute or relative changes in cTn have higher diagnostic accuracy and should therefore be preferred. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of absolute (Δ) and relative (Δ%) changes in cTn in 836 patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of AMI. Blood samples for the determination of high-sensitive cTn T and cTn I ultra were collected at presentation and after 1 and 2 hours in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing AMI was significantly higher for 2-hour absolute (Δ) versus 2-hour relative (Δ%) cTn changes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval], high-sensitivity cTn T: 0.95 [0.92 to 0.98] versus 0.76 [0.70 to 0.83], P<0.001; cTn I ultra: 0.95 [0.91 to 0.99] versus 0.72 [0.66 to 0.79], P<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve-derived cutoff value for 2-hour absolute (Δ) change was 0.007 µg/L for high-sensitivity cTn T and 0.020 µg/L for cTn I ultra (both cutoff levels are half of the 99th percentile of the respective cTn assay). Absolute changes were superior to relative changes in patients with both low and elevated baseline cTn levels. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute changes of cTn levels have a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for AMI than relative changes, and seem therefore to be the preferred criteria to distinguish AMI from other causes of cTn elevations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT00470587.