Early experience with the free lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction has become a progressively more popular method of breast reconstruction. A wide variety of perforator flaps have been described and subsequently refined to decrease donor-site morbidity. Recently, the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap has been reported as an option for autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: This study summarises the prospectively gathered data of 35 free LAP flaps for breast reconstruction in 28 patients. The mean follow-up was 18 months. RESULTS: The internal mammary artery and the venae comitantes were used as recipient vessels in all reconstructions. In 80% of the reconstructions (28 flaps), an interposition graft was used. Six flaps (17%) had to be revised for venous thrombosis. Two of the revised flaps (5.7%) could not be salvaged, and total flap necrosis occurred. The mean operating time was 6 h and 15 min, 6 h and 39 min when an interposition graft was used and 5 h and 23 min when no interposition graft was necessary. CONCLUSION: The LAP flap should be considered as a further alternative for breast reconstruction in patients in whom a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap is not possible or not desirable. Shaping of this flap is easier compared to any other flaps due to the quality of the lumbar fat and the gluteal extension. An interposition graft is frequently used to facilitate anastomosis, either to lengthen the pedicle or to resolve size mismatch. This is a disadvantage of the LAP flap.

Complex facial reconstruction by vascularized composite allotransplantation: the first Belgian case.

INTRODUCTION: Complex injuries to the central part of the face are difficult to reconstruct with the current plastic surgery methods. The ultimate one-staged approach to restore anatomy and vital facial functions is to perform a vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). METHODS: A 54-year-old man suffered from a high-energy ballistic injury, resulting in a large central facial defect. A temporary reconstruction was performed with a free plicated anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. Considering the goal to optimally restore facial function and aesthetics, VCA was considered as an option for facial reconstruction. A multidisciplinary team approach, digital planning, and cadaver sessions preceded the transplantation. RESULTS: A digitally planned facial VCA was performed involving the bilateral maxillae, the hard palate, a part of the left mandible, and the soft tissues of the lower two-thirds of the face. Due to meticulous preparations, minimal adjustments were necessary to achieve good fitting in the recipient. At week 17, a grade 4 rejection was successfully treated; sensory and motor recovery was noted to occur from the fourth postoperative month. Several serious infectious and medical problems have occurred until 15-months postoperatively; following that, the clinical situation has remained stable. Two years postoperatively, the patient and his family are very satisfied with the overall outcome and social reintegration in the community is successful. CONCLUSION: The first face transplant in Belgium (#19 worldwide) was successful because of a meticulous 3-year preparation by a large multidisciplinary team. In our experience, preparatory cadaver dissections and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) modeling were valuable tools for an optimal intraoperative course and good alignment of the bony structures. Continuous long-term multidisciplinary follow-up is mandatory for surveillance of the complications associated with the immunosuppressive regime and for functional assessment of the graft.