Motivating factors for dual-method contraceptive use among adolescents and young women: a qualitative investigation.

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study explores how adolescents and young women perceive the need for and describe the use of dual method contraception. STUDY DESIGN: We interviewed 20 sexually active women aged 16-24 who attended an adolescent-focused Title X family-planning clinic and were using a non-barrier contraceptive method. We used a semi-structured interview guide that included domains related to sexual activity, knowledge of and use of contraceptives and condoms, and relationship factors. We coded transcripts using grounded theory techniques and used an iterative process to develop overarching themes. RESULTS: Dual method contraceptive users primarily discussed pregnancy prevention as their motivating factor. Many expressed anxieties over an unplanned pregnancy and reported condom use as "back-up" contraception. Risk perception for pregnancy or STI acquisition did not necessarily change as relationship trust increased, but rather, their anxiety regarding the negativity of such outcomes decreased. Dual-method contraception use decreased when participants reported that condoms were not readily available, or when they self-described immaturity. Less frequently, participants reported dual method use for sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention, and many substituted STI testing for condom use. Contraceptive type (short-acting vs. long-acting) did not influence reported attitudes towards dual method use. CONCLUSION: Health educators and clinicians encourage condom use in young women due to the significant morbidity associated with STI acquisition. Most participants in our study view condoms as a way to improve pregnancy prevention. Acknowledging and addressing this divergence in motivation will allow caregivers to improve strategies for communicating the importance of dual method use. IMPLICATIONS: Young women primarily describe pregnancy prevention as the reason for dual method use, STI protection is less salient. Consideration of this viewpoint by health educators and clinicians will allow us to communicate more effectively to prevent STI morbidity.

Missed Opportunities for Condom Counseling Among Adolescent Males.

The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of condom counseling (CC) among adolescent males at preventive (PV) and non-PV (NPV) clinic visits in order to identify missed opportunities for contraception counseling. Adolescent males attending an outpatient clinic at a tertiary children's hospital from 2009 to 2013 were included. Patient demographics and provider responses to a postvisit electronic medical record questionnaire regarding CC were collected. Over 4 years, 2,439 males attended 6,123 visits; 33% were PVs. CC occurred at 92% PVs versus 43% NPVs ( p < .001). Those receiving CC were more likely to be older (16.1 vs. 15.9 years; p < .001) and minority (odds ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval = 1.28-1.61). In conclusion, in this single-center study among adolescent males, CC occurred routinely at PVs but infrequently at NPVs. CC was more likely among older, minority males. Providing CC at NPVs and ensuring younger, White males receive CC are two strategies to increase rates of CC among adolescent males.

Contraception and Adolescent Males: An Opportunity for Providers.

PURPOSE: To examine young men's awareness of emergency contraception (EC) and its association with their contraceptive decision-making contributions within a relationship. METHODS: A convenience sample of English-speaking male patients aged 13-24 years were surveyed regarding their childbearing intentions, contraceptive awareness (including EC), perceived contraceptive knowledge, and communication about birth control with providers and within a relationship. RESULTS: An ethnically diverse sample of adolescent males was recruited with a mean age of 18.9 years. Most had previously been sexually active (75%) and felt it was important to avoid pregnancy (84%) and 61% reported ever having spoken to a health care provider about birth control (other than condoms), but only 42% had heard of EC. Participants who had heard of EC were more likely to have spoken to a health care provider about contraception in the past (51.5% vs. 29.8%; p = .050), to feel they should participate in contraceptive decisions in a relationship (97.4% vs. 76.5%; p = .006), and to have discussed contraception with a partner (76.9% vs. 29.2%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Counseling young men about EC, as well as other methods of birth control, may empower them to become actively involved in contraceptive decisions within a relationship if they do not desire fatherhood.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Continuation, Completion, and Missed Opportunities.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine human papillomavirus (HPV) series completion in older adolescents and assess vaccination completion opportunities missed by providers. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electronic medical records were queried for women 18-24 years old who initiated the HPV vaccine in the Adolescent Medicine, Young Mother's, or Family Planning clinics at Children's Hospital Colorado from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2012. Clinic visits during appropriate dosing intervals of HPV vaccine at which the second (4-14 weeks after first dose) or third (21-40 weeks after first dose and >12 weeks after second dose) doses were not administered were counted as "missed opportunities." RESULTS: A total of 1072 female adolescents initiated the HPV series during the study period; 20.9% completed the series within 1 year. Of these, 33.7% who did not receive their second dose had at least 1 missed opportunity and 25.5% who received the second but not the third had a missed opportunity. Women who initiated the vaccine in the Family Planning clinic were less likely to have missed opportunities than those in other adolescent clinics (36.2% vs 56.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A significant number of female adolescents who initiated the HPV vaccine attended clinic visits at which opportunities for vaccine continuation and completion were missed. This emphasizes the importance of provider awareness of vaccine updates at every adolescent visit. Our overall completion rate is significantly lower than published rates and might reflect older adolescents' inexperience in managing their own preventive health care. Our results clearly identify the need for provider and patient interventions to improve vaccine series completion.

Adolescent and Young Women's Contraceptive Decision-Making Processes: Choosing "The Best Method for Her".

PURPOSE: To evaluate influences on adolescent and young women's contraceptive decision-making processes. METHODS: We conducted 21 individual interviews with women who presented to an adolescent-focused Title X family planning clinic seeking a new contraceptive method. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide, audio-taped and transcribed. Three researchers independently coded the transcripts using grounded theory; codes were organized into overarching themes and discrepancies were resolved. RESULTS: After identification of themes, we organized the conceptual framework of the decision-making process using the transtheoretical model of behavior change in which participants move through 4 stages: (1) contemplation, (2) preparation, (3) action, and (4) maintenance. When contemplating contraception, most of our participants were highly motivated to avoid pregnancy. During preparation, participants gathered information related to their contraceptive concerns. Participants cited peers as primary informants and healthcare providers as experts in the field. Participants integrated information received with their personal concerns about contraception initiation; the most common concerns were effectiveness, method duration, convenience, and side effects. When participants acted on choosing a contraceptive method they described how it fit their individual needs. They considered their contraceptive experiences unique and not necessarily applicable to others. During maintenance, they acted as informants for other peers, but most commonly expressed that each individual must choose "the best method for her." CONCLUSIONS: When adolescent and young women select a contraceptive method they balance the benefits and risks of available methods portrayed by peers and provider in the context of their personal concerns. Peer influence appeared to be greatest when participants shared contraceptive concerns and goals.

Insertion characteristics of intrauterine devices in adolescents and young women: success, ancillary measures, and complications.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate success and safety of intrauterine device (IUD) placement in a large cohort of adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: We examined the medical records of patients aged 13-24 years at the Children's Hospital Colorado Adolescent Family Planning Clinic with at least 1 attempt at IUD placement. We abstracted demographic, reproductive, and procedural variables. The primary outcome was successful placement at first IUD insertion visit. We compared nulliparous with parous adolescents and patients younger than 18 years with those 18 years of age and older. RESULTS: Between April 2009 and December 2011, 1177 adolescent women aged 13-24 years (mean age 20.8 ± 2.5 years) had an attempted IUD placement, 1012 (86%) of which were with an advanced practice clinician. The first attempt was successful for 1132 women (96.2%). The first-attempt success rate was 95.8% for nulliparous women and 96.7% for parous women (P = .45). The first-attempt success rate was 95.5% (n = 169) for women aged 13-17 years compared with 96.3% (n = 963) for women aged 18-24 years (P = .6). Only 1.8% (n = 21) of all first-attempt successful insertions required ancillary measures. Of the 45 patients with a failed first insertion attempt, 40% (n = 18) had a second attempt with a physician, of which 78% (n = 14) were successful. Within the first 6 months of IUD placement, no perforations were identified and 24 patients (3.0%) expelled the IUD. Insertion failures and IUD expulsions were not related to IUD type, age, or parity. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine devices can be inserted in nulliparous adolescents of any age with similar success to parous adolescents, by both physicians and advanced practice clinicians. Inability to provide ancillary measures such as paracervical block or cervical dilation should not limit access to this first-line contraceptive method.