Endometrial hyperplasia in pre-menopausal women: A systematic review of incidence, prevalence, and risk factors.

OBJECTIVES: Hormonal therapies have been associated with a range of effects on the endometrium, including endometrial hyperplasia (EH). With many medicinal products being developed for pre-menopausal women, epidemiological data regarding the population background risk could meaningfully supplement comparative risk data gathered in clinical trials. However, epidemiological studies on EH often focus on post-menopausal women. We aimed to assess the available observational evidence on the incidence and prevalence of EH among pre-menopausal women and to investigate the influence of specific risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted systematic literature searches on 27 August 2021, using the Embase and PubMed databases. Searches were designed to identify studies of EH epidemiology, published in English on or after 1 January 1995, in populations of predominantly pre-menopausal women. Studies were required to report diagnostic histopathology data for at least 500 women. Relevant outcomes were the prevalence and incidence of EH, and/or the impact of pre-specified risk factors including age, body mass index (BMI) and diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: In total, 3785 records were screened, and 31 references, describing 29 different studies, were included in the review. The incidence of EH among pre-menopausal women increased with age and was as high as 121 and 270 cases per 100,000 woman-years in South Korean women aged 46-50 years and US women aged 45-49 years, respectively. The prevalence of EH was highly dependent on the population studied. Estimates of EH prevalence in 14 studies of pre-menopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) ranged from 3.4% to 265%, higher than the reported prevalence in two studies of women with infertility (0.9% and 3.0%). Studies of risk factors found increasing age, BMI and diabetes to be associated with an increased prevalence of EH. CONCLUSIONS: Published data on the epidemiology of EH in pre-menopausal women are heterogeneous, with considerable variation in study methodology and populations, and in how EH subtypes are reported. The main factors affecting the reported prevalence and incidence of EH are the reason a biopsy was performed - particularly whether patients had AUB, a key symptom associated with EH - and the presence of known risk factors.

Assessment of the safe and efficacious dose of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan for the treatment of patients with uterine fibroids by exposure-response modelling and simulation.

AIMS: We report population pharmacokinetic (popPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses for efficacy (induced amenorrhoea [IA]) and safety (unbound oestradiol [E2] concentrations) of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan. Results were used to inform the dose for the Phase 3 programme in patients with uterine fibroids. METHODS: A popPK model was developed using data from Phase 1 and 2 studies (including ASTEROID 1 and 2). The relationship between vilaprisan exposure (steady-state AUC) and IA after oral administration of 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg/day over 3 months was analysed in ASTEROID 1 using logistic regression and qualified in ASTEROID 2 by comparing simulated and observed probability for IA after 2 mg/day. The exposure-E2 relationship was analysed visually. RESULTS: Vilaprisan clearance was 22.7% lower in obese vs non-obese patients. The E-R relationship for IA in ASTEROID 1 was steep and consistent with ASTEROID 2, with a maximum probability (Pmax ) of 59% (95% CI: 49-68%). The exposure at which 50% of Pmax is obtained was 36.9 µg*h/L (95% CI: 27.7-48.7 µg*h/L). Simulations showed that 36% of the patients will be below 90% of Pmax for IA after 1 mg/day compared to 2% after 2 mg/day. E2 levels tended to decrease with increasing exposure. While E2 levels remained largely within the physiologic follicular phase range, the clinical relevance of this decrease will be evaluated in long-term studies. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 mg/day dose was selected for Phase 3 as E-R analyses show this dose results in a close to maximum probability for IA, without any safety concerns noted.

Efficacy and safety of vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: Data from the phase 2b randomized controlled trial ASTEROID 2.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of vilaprisan compared with placebo in the management of the symptoms of uterine fibroids (UF), with a secondary objective to provide a descriptive comparison with ulipristal acetate. STUDY DESIGN: The randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, multicenter ASTEROID 2 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of vilaprisan versus placebo and ulipristal acetate for two 12-week treatment periods in women with ≥1 UF experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). The primary endpoint compared the efficacy of vilaprisan with placebo at 12 weeks, assessed as the absence of bleeding/spotting by bleeding diary. Secondary endpoints compared the efficacy of vilaprisan with ulipristal acetate. Results of the first 12-week treatment period are reported here. RESULTS: Women (mean age 42.5 years) were enrolled from 1 June 2015. At baseline, mean menstrual blood loss per 28 days was 214.1 mL and the volume of the three largest UF was 106.2 mL. In total, 155 women completed the initial 12-week treatment period. Complete absence of bleeding/spotting until the end of the 12-week treatment period was achieved by 62.9 % of women receiving vilaprisan versus 0.0 % with placebo (p < .001); 55.4 % of women treated with ulipristal acetate reported absence of bleeding/spotting. The predefined HMB response (<80 mL and >50 % reduction from baseline during the last 28 days of treatment) was observed in 95.7 % of subjects treated with vilaprisan and 86.5 % of subjects treated with ulipristal acetate. Vilaprisan and ulipristal acetate treatment reduced the sum of the volume of the three largest UF by 29.9 % and 23.8 %, respectively, whereas an increase of 6.3 % was observed in the placebo group. No safety concerns, including multiple laboratory parameters, were identified. CONCLUSION: Daily administration of vilaprisan 2 mg induced amenorrhea, controlled bleeding, decreased UF size, and was well tolerated in women with HMB associated with UF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02465814 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02465814.

Vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: the randomized phase 2b ASTEROID 1 study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of four vilaprisan doses (0.5-4.0 mg) in women with uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. SETTING: Ninety-eight centers in 12 countries. PATIENT(S): Women aged 18-50 years with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding were randomized equally to oral vilaprisan at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 4.0 mg or placebo once daily. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment for 12 weeks, 24-week follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary end point was absence of scheduled or unscheduled bleeding/spotting. Key secondary efficacy end points included volume of menstrual blood loss and change in fibroid volume. RESULT(S): A total of 309 patients were randomized, and 300 received treatment. Complete absence of bleeding/spotting was observed in 30%, 56%, 54%, and 60% of patients in the vilaprisan 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg groups, respectively, versus 1.7% with placebo. After 12 weeks, >83% of women achieved amenorrhea (<2 mL/28 days) with ≥1.0 mg vilaprisan versus 9% with placebo. Heavy menstrual bleeding stopped (but returned at a lower volume after treatment cessation) with ≥1.0 mg vilaprisan treatment. Reductions in fibroid volume of up to 41% were observed. Most patients receiving vilaprisan reported improvements in symptom severity. No safety concerns were identified in general safety, endometrial safety (by biopsy), laboratory values, and ultrasound examinations. CONCLUSION(S): ASTEROID 1 supports the efficacy of vilaprisan for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Daily oral treatment with vilaprisan 0.5-4.0 mg was well tolerated, and vilaprisan 2.0 mg once daily has been selected for further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02131662.