All exons are not created equal-exon vulnerability determines the effect of exonic mutations on splicing.

It is now widely accepted that aberrant splicing of constitutive exons is often caused by mutations affecting cis-acting splicing regulatory elements (SREs), but there is a misconception that all exons have an equal dependency on SREs and thus a similar vulnerability to aberrant splicing. We demonstrate that some exons are more likely to be affected by exonic splicing mutations (ESMs) due to an inherent vulnerability, which is context dependent and influenced by the strength of exon definition. We have developed VulExMap, a tool which is based on empirical data that can designate whether a constitutive exon is vulnerable. Using VulExMap, we find that only 25% of all exons can be categorized as vulnerable, whereas two-thirds of 359 previously reported ESMs in 75 disease genes are located in vulnerable exons. Because VulExMap analysis is based on empirical data on splicing of exons in their endogenous context, it includes all features important in determining the vulnerability. We believe that VulExMap will be an important tool when assessing the effect of exonic mutations by pinpointing whether they are located in exons vulnerable to ESMs.

Antisense Oligonucleotide Rescue of Deep-Intronic Variants Activating Pseudoexons in the 6-Pyruvoyl-Tetrahydropterin Synthase Gene.

We report two new 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase splicing variants identified through genomic sequencing and transcript analysis in a patient with tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, presenting with hyperphenylalaninemia and monoamine neurotransmitter deficiency. Variant c.243 + 3A>G causes exon 4 skipping. The deep-intronic c.164-672C>T variant creates a potential 5' splice site that leads to the inclusion of four overlapping pseudoexons, corresponding to exonizations of an antisense short interspersed nuclear element AluSq repeat sequence. Two of the identified pseudoexons have been reported previously, activated by different deep-intronic variants, and were also detected at residual levels in control cells. Interestingly, the predominant pseudoexon is nearly identical to a disease causing activated pseudoexon in the F8 gene, with the same 3' and 5' splice sites. Splice switching antisense oligonucleotides (SSOs) were designed to hybridize with splice sites and/or predicted binding sites for regulatory splice factors. Different SSOs corrected the aberrant pseudoexon inclusion, both in minigenes and in fibroblasts from patients carrying the new variant c.164-672C>T or the previously described c.164-716A>T. With SSO treatment PTPS protein was recovered, illustrating the therapeutic potential of the approach, for patients with different pseudoexon activating variants in the region. In addition, the natural presence of pseudoexons in the wild type context suggests the possibility of applying the antisense strategy in patients with hypomorphic PTS variants with the purpose of upregulating their expression to increase overall protein and activity.

Pseudoexon activation in disease by non-splice site deep intronic sequence variation - wild type pseudoexons constitute high-risk sites in the human genome.

Accuracy of pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing is crucial for normal gene expression. Complex regulation supports the spliceosomal distinction between authentic exons and the many seemingly functional splice sites delimiting pseudoexons. Pseudoexons are nonfunctional intronic sequences that can be activated for aberrant inclusion in mRNA, which may cause disease. Pseudoexon activation is very challenging to predict, in particular when activation occurs by sequence variants that alter the splicing regulatory environment without directly affecting splice sites. As pseudoexon inclusion often evades detection due to activation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, and because conventional diagnostic procedures miss deep intronic sequence variation, pseudoexon activation is a heavily underreported disease mechanism. Pseudoexon characteristics have mainly been studied based on in silico predicted sequences. Moreover, because recognition of sequence variants that create or strengthen splice sites is possible by comparison with well-established consensus sequences, this type of pseudoexon activation is by far the most frequently reported. Here we review all known human disease-associated pseudoexons that carry functional splice sites and are activated by deep intronic sequence variants located outside splice site sequences. We delineate common characteristics that make this type of wild type pseudoexons distinct high-risk sites in the human genome.

Vulnerable exons, like ACADM exon 5, are highly dependent on maintaining a correct balance between splicing enhancers and silencers.

It is now widely accepted that aberrant splicing of constitutive exons is often caused by mutations affecting cis-acting splicing regulatory elements, but there is a misconception that all exons have an equal dependency on splicing regulatory elements and thus a similar susceptibility to aberrant splicing. We investigated exonic mutations in ACADM exon 5 to experimentally examine their effect on splicing and found that 7 out of 11 tested mutations affected exon inclusion, demonstrating that this constitutive exon is particularly vulnerable to exonic splicing mutations. Employing ACADM exon 5 and 6 as models, we demonstrate that the balance between splicing enhancers and silencers, flanking intron length, and flanking splice site strength are important factors that determine exon definition and splicing efficiency of the exon in question. Our study shows that two constitutive exons in ACADM have different inherent vulnerabilities to exonic splicing mutations. This suggests that in silico prediction of potential pathogenic effects on splicing from exonic mutations may be improved by also considering the inherent vulnerability of the exon. Moreover, we show that single nucleotide polymorphism that affect either of two different exonic splicing silencers, located far apart in exon 5, all protect against both immediately flanking and more distant exonic splicing mutations.

Blocking of an intronic splicing silencer completely rescues IKBKAP exon 20 splicing in familial dysautonomia patient cells.

Familial dysautonomia (FD) is a severe genetic disorder causing sensory and autonomic dysfunction. It is predominantly caused by a c.2204+6T>C mutation in the IKBKAP gene. This mutation decreases the 5' splice site strength of IKBKAP exon 20 leading to exon 20 skipping and decreased amounts of full-length IKAP protein. We identified a binding site for the splicing regulatory protein hnRNP A1 downstream of the IKBKAP exon 20 5'-splice site. We show that hnRNP A1 binds to this splicing regulatory element (SRE) and that two previously described inhibitory SREs inside IKBKAP exon 20 are also bound by hnRNP A1. Knockdown of hnRNP A1 in FD patient fibroblasts increases IKBKAP exon 20 inclusion demonstrating that hnRNP A1 is a negative regulator of IKBKAP exon 20 splicing. Furthermore, by mutating the SREs in an IKBKAP minigene we show that all three SREs cause hnRNP A1-mediated exon repression. We designed splice switching oligonucleotides (SSO) that blocks the intronic hnRNP A1 binding site, and demonstrate that this completely rescues splicing of IKBKAP exon 20 in FD patient fibroblasts and increases the amounts of IKAP protein. We propose that this may be developed into a potential new specific treatment of FD.

The Splicing Efficiency of Activating HRAS Mutations Can Determine Costello Syndrome Phenotype and Frequency in Cancer.

Costello syndrome (CS) may be caused by activating mutations in codon 12/13 of the HRAS proto-oncogene. HRAS p.Gly12Val mutations have the highest transforming activity, are very frequent in cancers, but very rare in CS, where they are reported to cause a severe, early lethal, phenotype. We identified an unusual, new germline p.Gly12Val mutation, c.35_36GC>TG, in a 12-year-old boy with attenuated CS. Analysis of his HRAS cDNA showed high levels of exon 2 skipping. Using wild type and mutant HRAS minigenes, we confirmed that c.35_36GC>TG results in exon 2 skipping by simultaneously disrupting the function of a critical Exonic Splicing Enhancer (ESE) and creation of an Exonic Splicing Silencer (ESS). We show that this vulnerability of HRAS exon 2 is caused by a weak 3' splice site, which makes exon 2 inclusion dependent on binding of splicing stimulatory proteins, like SRSF2, to the critical ESE. Because the majority of cancer- and CS- causing mutations are located here, they affect splicing differently. Therefore, our results also demonstrate that the phenotype in CS and somatic cancers is not only determined by the different transforming potentials of mutant HRAS proteins, but also by the efficiency of exon 2 inclusion resulting from the different HRAS mutations. Finally, we show that a splice switching oligonucleotide (SSO) that blocks access to the critical ESE causes exon 2 skipping and halts proliferation of cancer cells. This unravels a potential for development of new anti-cancer therapies based on SSO-mediated HRAS exon 2 skipping.