ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of stable knee joint kinematics using modular axis-guided revision implants after failed knee arthroplasty surgery. INDICATIONS: Revision implant for bone defects (type Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute [AORI] III) in case of revision arthroplasty. Primary implant in case of mediolateral instability (>grade I) or multidirectional instability. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Persistent or current joint infection, general infection (e.g. pneumonia), missing metaphysis femoral and/or tibial, insufficient extensor apparatus. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Standard approach extending the previously used skin incision. Arthrotomy, synovectomy and collection of multiple samples for microbiological and histopathological analyses. Preparation of the femur with reamers of increasing diameter. Subsequently, a reference stem is anchored and after referencing the correct rotation and joint line height; the femoral osteotomy is performed after fixation of the 5in1 cutting block. Following the femoral osteotomy, the box of the femoral prosthesis is prepared. In addition, the tibia is prepared using an intramedullary reference system. Level of constraint and additional tibial augmentation is chosen according to the amount of defect bone and according to ligament stability. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Full load bearing; standard wound control and sterile dressings; limitation of active/passive range of motion only in case of weakened extensor apparatus. RESULTS: Between 03/2011 and 05/2018, a total of 48 patients underwent revision arthroplasty using the described system. The mean follow-up was 24 months (range 21-35 months). In 30 of the 48 cases, a rotating hinge variant was implanted, while in 18 cases a semiconstrained variant was implanted. Indications to revision arthroplasty: infection (nâ¯= 22), aseptic loosening (nâ¯= 11), instability (nâ¯= 11), periprosthetic fracture (nâ¯= 3) and PMMA allergy (nâ¯= 1). In 11 cases, revision had to be performed due to persistent infection (nâ¯= 6) and aseptic loosening (nâ¯= 5): 9 cases could be successful treated by a two-step revision procedure, while in 2 cases it was necessary to perform an arthrodesis. The 2year implant survival rate was 77%.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Reoperation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patellar instability is a common orthopaedic condition which is often seen in younger individuals. Biomechanical studies have shown that the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important soft tissue that restrains lateral subluxation of the patella in the beginning of flexion of the knee joint. METHODS: MPFL reconstruction is an effective procedure to treat recurrent patellar dislocation. Double-bundle and single-bundle procedures have been described. If double-bundle reconstruction is not possible, there are good postoperative outcomes with single-bundle procedure as well. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of MPFL reconstruction as a single procedure to treat patellar instability in patients with down syndrome.
Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/genetics , Joint Instability/genetics , Joint Instability/surgery , Patellofemoral Joint/surgery , Adolescent , Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Male , Patella/abnormalities , Patella/surgery , Patellar Dislocation/diagnostic imaging , Patellar Dislocation/genetics , Patellar Dislocation/surgery , Patellofemoral Joint/abnormalities , Patellofemoral Joint/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Recurrence , ReoperationABSTRACT
Flexible flatfoot is a common malalignment in the paediatric population. Arthroereisis with a calcaneo-stop screw is an effective surgical procedure for treating juvenile flexible flatfoot after conservative measures have been fully exploited. In the present report, we describe the case of a loosening of a calcaneo-stop screw in a 12-year-old youth after excessive trampolining.
