Telemedicine Use, Comfort, and Perceived Effectiveness in the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Community.

Background: Telemedicine may increase access to clinical care, particularly for mobility-limited communities such as the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) community. However, much of the information on exposure to and attitudes toward telemedicine in neuromuscular diseases generally and SMA specifically is anecdotal or from focus groups. Gaining greater insight into patient perspectives is important, given telemedicine's potential for expanding access to care and growing use of telemedicine as a result of technology advances and the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Cure SMA collected information on the SMA community's exposure to, comfort with, and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine through its 2021 Community Update Survey. The final analytic sample represented 463 SMA-affected individuals, resident in the United States. Descriptive analyses, correlations, and ordered logit regression models were used to characterize the sample and identify predictors of exposure, comfort, and perceived effectiveness. Data were analyzed on weighted and unweighted bases to account for differences between the survey sample and the SMA community. Stratified analyses were used to compare self-completed surveys with caregiver-completed surveys. Results: 463 individuals answered questions about telemedicine. Approximately four-fifths of these respondents had used telemedicine previously. Factors predicting greater likelihood of prior telemedicine use included male gender, increasing income, having received drug treatment for SMA, history of mental illness, and having non-neutral views regarding comfort and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine. Several factors were also significant predictors of comfort with and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine. Stratified analyses indicated differences between self-completed and caregiver-completed surveys. Conclusion: These results can provide insight into patient experiences with telemedicine and can inform approaches to its use by health care professionals and clinical trial sponsors.

The Cure SMA Clinical Trial Experience Survey: A Study of Trial Participant Perspectives on Clinical Trial Management and Patient-Centric Management Practices.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding clinical trial experiences can illuminate opportunities to optimize trial design and management, with potential benefits for recruitment and retention. This study sought to better understand clinical trial participant experiences and attitudes within spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and how the evolving treatment landscape and participant characteristics may predict attitudes. METHODS: A survey was developed following a review of published literature and discussions with caregivers of SMA trial participants. This was distributed via email to known trial participants in Cure SMA's database, announcements in Cure SMA's newsletter, and emails to SMA clinical trial principal investigators. RESULTS: Seventy complete surveys reflecting unique clinical trial experiences were included in analysis. Responses revealed positive attitudes about clinical trial management overall. Top motivators for trial participation included clinical benefit, investigational drug access, and the opportunity to help others. Top concerns were safety, whether benefits would justify risks, and concerns about pain accompanying tests. The greatest stressors were fear of pain, adverse event concerns, and challenges managing medical complications of SMA. Top benefits of trial participation were hope for a better future, helping others, and relationships with the study team. In regression analysis, participant gender, age, and race all emerged as significant predictors (p < 0.05) of motivators, concerns, stressors, and benefits, as did respondent type, knowledge about SMA, distance to the trial site, and treatment era. Top recommendations for improving study management all related to receiving more information. CONCLUSION: This research provides new perspective on patient experiences in SMA clinical trials. It underscores the importance of information and efforts to anticipate and accommodate participant needs. These findings may inform study design and interactions with research participants. They may become especially important in supporting recruitment and retention as more treatment options become available.

Clinical trials can be stressful experiences for patients and their caregivers, especially when participants are affected by serious diseases. By understanding trial participants' attitudes and experiences, researchers may be better able to accommodate their interests when designing and conducting research studies. This study sought insight into attitudes and experiences of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) clinical trial participants by surveying people who participated in SMA clinical trials in the USA. The data used in analysis reflected 70 unique clinical trial experiences. Survey responses revealed positive attitudes about clinical trial management overall. Top motivators for trial participation included clinical benefit, investigational drug access, and the opportunity to help others. Top concerns were safety, whether benefits would justify risks, and concerns about pain accompanying tests. The greatest stressors were fear of pain, adverse event concerns, and challenges managing medical complications of SMA. Top benefits of trial participation were hope for a better future, helping others, and relationships with the study team. Whether or not specific motivators, concerns, stressors, and benefits were important was predicted by participant gender, age, and race, as well as respondent type (participant or caregiver), knowledge about SMA, distance to the trial site, and treatment era. Top recommendations for improving study management all related to receiving more information. This research provides new perspective on patient experiences in SMA clinical trials, and may be used to inform future study design and interactions with research participants.

The Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Consortium as a Model for Advancing Research and Dialogue on Rare Severe Adverse Drug Reactions.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare but serious disease. Caused by the JC virus (JCV), it occurs in individuals with weakened immune systems and is a potential adverse reaction for certain immunomodulatory drugs. The PML Consortium was created to find better methods to predict, prevent, and treat PML. The Consortium brought together the pharmaceutical industry with academic, regulatory, and patient communities to advance research and dialogue on PML through a not-for-profit, collaborative approach involving a grant program, scientific workshops and conferences, and disease awareness efforts. Over nearly a decade, the Consortium contributed to the PML and JCV fields by advancing research, scientific exchange, and awareness of PML. In addition to advancing knowledge and helping to build cross-sector consensus on research priorities, the Consortium's grant program filled a funding gap and brought new investigators into PML and JCV research. Additionally, the Consortium's workshops and conferences created platforms for exchange that drove dialogue on knowledge gaps and future research directions. The Consortium also contributed to the scientific knowledge base with two literature reviews, one on PML treatment studies and a second on T cell deficiencies as a risk factor for PML and the brain as a site for conversion of harmless JCV into a pathogenic virus. Finally, the Consortium addressed a significant information gap with its disease awareness website for healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers. Beyond its impact on the PML and JCV fields, the PML Consortium is important because it provides a precedent for how the pharmaceutical industry, academic researchers, patient organizations, and government can work together to address rare diseases, in particular rare adverse events. This kind of collaboration could be replicated to speed progress in addressing other rare diseases and adverse events, with significant potential benefits for the scientific, medical, and patient communities. FUNDING: PML Consortium (PML Consortium, Washington, DC).