Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e248572, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669016

ABSTRACT

Importance: Evacuation has been found to be associated with adverse outcomes among nursing home residents during hurricanes, but the outcomes for assisted living (AL) residents remain unknown. Objective: To examine the association between evacuation and health care outcomes (ie, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, mortality, and nursing home visits) among Florida AL residents exposed to Hurricane Irma. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using 2017 Medicare claims data. Participants were a cohort of Florida AL residents who were aged 65 years or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service, and resided in 9-digit zip codes corresponding to US assisted living communities with 25 or more beds on September 10, 2017, the day of Hurricane Irma's landfall. Propensity score matching was used to match evacuated residents to those that sheltered-in-place based on resident and AL characteristics. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to February 2024. Exposure: Whether the AL community evacuated or sheltered-in-place before Hurricane Irma made landfall. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty- and 90-day emergency department visits, hospitalizations, mortality, and nursing home admissions. Results: The study cohort included 25 130 Florida AL residents (mean [SD] age 81 [9] years); 3402 (13.5%) evacuated and 21 728 (86.5%) did not evacuate. The evacuated group had 2223 women (65.3%), and the group that sheltered-in-place had 14 556 women (67.0%). In the evacuated group, 42 residents (1.2%) were Black, 93 (2.7%) were Hispanic, and 3225 (94.8%) were White. In the group that sheltered in place, 490 residents (2.3%) were Black, 707 (3.3%) were Hispanic, and 20 212 (93.0%) were White. After 1:4 propensity score matching, when compared with sheltering-in-place, evacuation was associated with a 16% greater odds of emergency department visits (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .04) and 51% greater odds of nursing home visits (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14-2.00; P = .01) within 30 days of Hurricane Irma's landfall. Hospitalization and mortality did not vary significantly by evacuation status within 30 or 90 days after the landfall date. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Florida AL residents, there was an increased risk of nursing home and emergency department visits within 30 days of Hurricane Irma's landfall among residents from communities that evacuated before the storm when compared with residents from communities that sheltered-in-place. The stress and disruption caused by evacuation may yield poorer immediate health outcomes after a major storm for AL residents. Therefore, the potential benefits and harms of evacuating vs sheltering-in-place must be carefully considered when developing emergency planning and response.


Subject(s)
Assisted Living Facilities , Cyclonic Storms , Humans , Cyclonic Storms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Aged , Florida , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , United States , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data
2.
Gerontologist ; 64(3)2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37351950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Disaster preparedness is an urgent concern, particularly for caregivers of persons with dementia. Developing and executing plans for oneself and another person who needs care can be difficult when the care recipient is cognitively impaired. We sought to better understand caregivers' disaster preparedness for the purpose of generating guidance for future interventions to increase caregiver resilience. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of caregiver disaster experiences and perceptions of their preparedness. Fifty-two participants from diverse backgrounds participated in a focus group or interview. Deductive thematic data analysis was utilized to identify themes. Stress process models guided the interpretation of our findings. RESULTS: Analyses of caregivers' experiences and observations revealed that disaster preparedness was challenging for caregivers, though also perceived to be an important responsibility. We identified 3 main themes: (a) barriers to preparing for a disaster as a caregiver for a person living with dementia, (b) why it is important for a caregiver to develop a disaster plan, and (c) how to facilitate preparedness for caregivers of persons living with dementia. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This study highlighted the difficulties of preparing for a disaster while caring for a person with dementia. Applying stress process models to our results provided strong evidence that interventions could be developed to bolster caregivers' resources to cope with stressors associated with disaster preparedness. A key issue for public officials is the question of whether disaster shelters are appropriate for persons with dementia.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Disaster Planning , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , Caregivers , Qualitative Research
3.
Clin Gerontol ; 47(1): 149-160, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36111824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Project VITAL At Home aimed to combat social isolation and loneliness in family caregivers of people with dementia through purposeful engagement and connection. This project examined the effects of technology on caregiver loneliness and well-being, as well as their technology experiences, during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Family caregivers were provided iN2L tablets and access to Alzheimer's Association supportive programs. Caregivers (n = 124) completed online surveys at pre and post evaluation points (average 7 months apart) to assess loneliness, subjective well-being (affect), supportive program usage, and tablet experiences. RESULTS: Family caregivers had positive perceptions of the tablets for both themselves and their family members. Tablets had positive effects on caregiver well-being, including giving them an additional caregiver tool, alleviating stress, increasing satisfaction with quiet time, and improving access to supportive programs. Caregiver positive affect decreased, but no changes were observed for negative affect or loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: Family caregivers found value in the tablets and showed improvements in some aspects of well-being. Randomized trials are needed to more fully assess the benefits of the intervention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Pairing tablets with caregiving supports is a promising intervention to improve caregivers' access to vital resources and services and to improve their well-being.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Dementia , Humans , Loneliness , Pandemics , Family
4.
J Appl Gerontol ; 42(10): 2148-2157, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37172107

ABSTRACT

We examined the effect of Winter Storm Uri on daily direct-care nurse staffing levels in 1,173 Texas nursing homes (NHs) from February 13th to 19th, 2021. We used data from Payroll-Based Journaling and the Care Compare website. Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the linear and non-linear change in staffing. During Winter Storm Uri, Texas NHs experienced a linear decrease in daily staffing levels with subsequent non-linear increase for registered nurses (RNs; p < .001) and certified nursing assistants (CNAs; p < .001), and staffing increased linearly for licensed practical nurses (LPNs; p < .001). Compared to 1 week before the storm, Texas NHs reported lower staffing levels across all three types of staff, but most dramatically among LPNs and CNAs. In supplemental analyses, urban and lower quality NHs fared slightly poorer than rural and higher-quality NHs. Winter storms pose a particular challenge to NHs and their ability to maintain direct-care nurse staffing levels.


Subject(s)
Nursing Assistants , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Humans , Texas , Nursing Homes , Workforce
5.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 78(9): 1484-1492, 2023 08 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37082891

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine associations between music engagement and episodic memory for more than 12 years in a nationally representative sample of middle- and older-aged adults in the United States. METHODS: This study is based on a secondary analysis of data from a sample (N = 5,021) of cognitively normal adults from the Health and Retirement Study (2006-2018). Episodic memory was measured by immediate and delayed recall tasks. Music engagement was classified as none, passive (i.e., listening to music), active (i.e., singing and/or playing an instrument), or both (i.e., listening to music and singing or playing an instrument). RESULTS: Compared with those with no music engagement, respondents who reported both passive and active engagement performed 0.258 points better at baseline on episodic memory tasks. This group also performed better across time with scores that declined by 0.043 points fewer per study visit. Additionally, compared to those with no music engagement, participants with passive music engagement had scores that declined by 0.023 points fewer per visit. There were no significant differences in performance at baseline for those with passive or active music engagement, or across time for those with active engagement. DISCUSSION: The results of this study suggest that engaging in both passive and active music engagement may be superior to engaging with music only passively or actively and that engaging in music both ways may be able to protect against age-related declines in episodic memory. Future research should examine whether community-based music engagement interventions can affect this trajectory of decline.


Subject(s)
Memory, Episodic , Music , Humans , United States , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Mental Recall
7.
J Appl Gerontol ; 42(7): 1565-1573, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36905348

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 regulations have posed challenges for long-term care (LTC). However, few studies have examined how such regulations influenced the care of residents living with dementia. Our objective was to gain an understanding of LTC administrative leaders' perceptions regarding the impact of the COVID-19 response on this population. Using the convoys of care framework, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Forty-three participants, representing 60 LTC facilities, completed one interview where they described how COVID-19 policies shaped care for residents living with dementia. Results from deductive thematic analysis revealed that participants believed the care convoys of residents living with dementia were strained. Participants emphasized how diminished family involvement, increased staff responsibilities, and the industry's heightened regulatory climate contributed to disrupted care. Further, they highlighted how pandemic-focused safety guidelines did not always consider the unique needs of those living with dementia. Consequently, this study may inform policy by outlining considerations for future emergencies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dementia , Humans , Long-Term Care , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Dementia/therapy
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(2): e2253952, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749590

ABSTRACT

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Five-Star Quality Rating System combines results from nursing home recertification surveys and complaint investigations into a single indicator for health inspections. This combination may mask complaint investigation results. Objective: To construct and compare star ratings specific to recertification surveys and specific to complaint investigations to discern whether they provide different information. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this quality improvement study, the Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System was used to calculate three 5-star ratings: 1 overall health inspection rating combining recertification survey scores and complaint investigation scores, 1 using only recertification scores, and 1 using only complaint investigation scores. The study included US nursing homes. The sample calculated star ratings for nursing homes in November 2017. This sample included all whose most recent recertification surveys occurred in 2016 up to and including November 2017, and those with 36 months of data from the ASPEN Complaints/Incidents Tracking System and the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports. Data analyses were completed on different days in 2022, depending on which questions were being addressed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison of the 3 star rating distributions. The recertification survey and complaint investigation star ratings were compared with respect to the overall health investigation rating. The recertification and complaint star ratings were cross-tabulated. Results: Among the 15 499 nursing homes, 19.8% had 1 overall health inspection star, 23.2% had 2, 23.2% had 3, 23.2% had 4, and 9.8% had 5 overall health inspection stars. Most had the same overall and recertification star ratings; for example, 79.4% had 5 overall stars and 5 recertification survey stars. However, overall and complaint-based star ratings were discordant, with a relatively large proportion of nursing homes (25.7%) having no complaint deficiencies and therefore high star ratings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this quality improvement study assessing the 2 components of the Five-Star Quality Rating System, results of recertification surveys were largely similar to health inspection star ratings. However, recertification survey scores differed from complaint inspection scores, suggesting health inspection ratings may not reflect consumers' views of care, services, or other valued amenities. A complaint-focused metric may have utility. However, research is needed concerning the many nursing homes with no or very few complaint deficiencies.


Subject(s)
Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care , Aged , Humans , United States , Medicare , Nursing Homes , Skilled Nursing Facilities
10.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(3): 888-894, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541058

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nursing home (NH) residents are vulnerable to mortality after natural disasters. We examined NH residents' excess all-cause mortality associated with Hurricane Harvey, a unique disaster with long-lasting flooding effects. We also explored how mortality differed between short-stay and long-stay residents and by chronic conditions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of Texas NH residents, comparing 30- and 90-day mortality among residents exposed to Hurricane Harvey in August 2017 to residents not exposed in the same location and time period during the previous 2 years. Data came from the Minimum Data Set Assessments and the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File. We used linear probability models to examine the association between hurricane exposure and mortality, adjusting for resident demographics, clinical acuity, and NH fixed effects. Models were stratified by short-stay and long-stay status. We also described differences in mortality by residents' chronic conditions. RESULTS: In 2017, 18,479 Texas NH residents were exposed to Hurricane Harvey. Exposure to Hurricane Harvey was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality. However, 7.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 7.9) of long-stay residents died 90 days after exposure to Harvey, compared to 6.3% (95% CI: 6.0, 6.7) during 2015. Apparently, this effect was driven by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as approximately 9.2% of these residents died within 90 days after Harvey landing compared to 7.2% in 2015 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hurricane exposure appears to have significant consequences for mortality among long-stay NH residents, which appear to materialize over the long-term (90 days post-hurricane in our study) and may not be apparent immediately (30 days post-hurricane in our study). NH residents with COPD may be particularly vulnerable to increased mortality risk following hurricane exposure. The results highlight the need to pay special attention to mortality risk in NH residents, particularly those with COPD, following hurricane exposure.


Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms , Natural Disasters , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Medicare , Death , Nursing Homes
11.
J Appl Gerontol ; 41(6): 1520-1527, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35232311

ABSTRACT

Older adults are among those most vulnerable to harm in disasters, such as hurricanes and wildfires. Nursing homes and other Medicare providers are subject to federal requirements to develop detailed disaster plans. However, millions of older adults receive care at home from non-Medicare providers who are under federal disaster preparedness rules that are less prescriptive than Medicare rules and subject to state interpretation. This study assessed the disaster preparedness policies for Older Americans Act-funded home- and community-based programs in 10 states with high numbers of older adults and experience with disasters. We found considerable variation by state. The results raise questions about the protection provided to vulnerable individuals who receive care at home in some states. However, the policies of some other states indicate an awareness that government has a significant role in protecting older adults exposed to disasters and that disaster preparedness is a component of aging in place.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Disasters , Aged , Community Health Services , Humans , Independent Living , Medicare , Policy , United States
12.
J Palliat Med ; 25(9): 1355-1360, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35325566

ABSTRACT

Background: Nursing home (NH) residents are vulnerable to increased mortality after a natural disaster such as hurricanes but the specific vulnerability of NH residents on hospice and the impact on admission to hospice are unknown. Objectives: Exposure to Hurricane Irma (2017) was used to evaluate increased mortality among Florida NH residents by hospice status compared with the same time period in a nonhurricane year. Difference in hospice utilization rates poststorm for short- and long-stay NH residents was also examined. Setting/Subjects: Subject were all Florida NH residents of age 65 years and older utilizing fee-for-service Medicare claims data exposed to Hurricane Irma in 2017 compared with a control group of residents residing at the same NHs in 2015. Analysis: Mortality rates were calculated by hospice status, rates of hospice enrollment, and the corresponding odds ratios (ORs). Results: Hurricane exposure was associated with an increase in mortality 30 days poststorm (OR = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.26) but not 90 days poststorm (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.95-1.10) for residents on hospice. For the rate of hospice enrollment poststorm among residents previously not on hospice, there was an increase in odds of enrollment among long-stay residents in 30 days (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23) and 90 days (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20) but not short-stay residents within 30 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.91-1.15) and 90 days (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.99-1.15). Conclusion: Mortality in NH residents on hospice care increased in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma. In addition, NH residents not on hospice were more likely to be referred to hospice in the 30 days after the storm.


Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms , Hospice Care , Hospices , Aged , Humans , Medicare , Nursing Homes , Retrospective Studies , United States
13.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 34(5): 742-754, 2022 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396928

ABSTRACT

While research tends to find an association of nurse staffing with quality in nursing homes, few studies examine complaints as a quality measure or account for ancillary staff. This study used federal nursing home complaint data to examine how key explanatory variables including nursing and ancillary staffing were associated with numbers of complaints and the likelihood of receiving a complaint. Results support that nursing home staffing is associated with quality. While direct care staffing was associated with fewer complaints, larger effects were found for social service and activities staffing. Increasing ancillary staffing may be a cost-effective way to reduce complaints.


Subject(s)
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Quality of Health Care , Humans , Nursing Homes , Workforce
14.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(8): 1409-1412.e1, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34740564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Nursing homes (NHs) are affected by major hurricanes and other natural disasters. To mitigate adverse effects of a major hurricane, NHs often increase their direct-care nurse staffing levels to meet the needs of their residents. However, the quality rating of the NH may affect the resources available to obtain and retain staff. This data brief provides estimates of direct-care nurse staffing levels by quality star rating during Hurricane Irma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from September 3, 2017, to September 10, 2017. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 570 Florida NHs that sheltered in place during Hurricane Irma. METHODS: We stratified NHs by their NH Compare overall quality star rating and then measured change in direct-care nurse staffing levels for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants. RESULTS: We found that the NH Compare overall star rating was positively associated with a greater staffing level response during Hurricane Irma among registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants. This change was largest for 5-star facilities and smallest for 1-star facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Higher-quality NHs may be more responsive and have the resources to be more responsive, to increased needs during a natural disaster. Our findings may serve as a platform for ongoing discussion on the role of the federal, state, and local governments in ensuring minimum staffing standards during natural disasters.


Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms , Nursing Assistants , Humans , Nursing Homes , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Retrospective Studies , Workforce
15.
Front Public Health ; 9: 720180, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34926365

ABSTRACT

Lack of social engagement and the resulting social isolation can have negative impacts on health and well-being, especially in senior care communities and for those living with dementia. Project VITAL leverages technology and community resources to create a network for connection, engagement, education, and support of individuals with dementia and their caregivers, and explores the impact of these interventions in reducing feelings of social isolation and increasing mood among residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through two phases, 600 personalized Wi-Fi-enabled iN2L tablets were distributed to 300 senior care communities (55% assisted living communities, 37% skilled nursing communities, 6% memory care communities, and 2% adult family-care homes) to connect and engage residents and their families. Different phases also included Project ECHO, a video-based learning platform, Alzheimer's Association virtual and online education and support for family caregivers, evidence-based online professional dementia care staff training and certification, and Virtual Forums designed to explore ways to build sustainable, scalable models to ensure access to support and decrease social isolation in the future. Tablet usage was collected over an 11-month period and an interim survey was designed to assess the effectiveness of the tablets, in preventing social isolation and increasing mood among residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 105 care community staff (whose community used the tablets) completed the survey and overall, these staff showed a high level of agreement to statements indicating that residents struggled with loneliness and mood, and that the tablet was useful in improving loneliness and mood in residents and allowing them to stay in touch with family and friends. Additional positive results were seen through a variety of other responses around the tablets and Project ECHO. Overall, the tablets were shown to be an effective way to engage residents and connect them with friends and family, as well as being a useful tool for staff members. A third phase is currently underway in the homes of people with dementia and their family caregivers, which includes tablets and direct access to Alzheimer's Association virtual and online education and support programs.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , COVID-19 , Dementia , Adult , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Community Resources , Dementia/epidemiology , Florida , Humans , Nursing Homes , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation , Technology
16.
Innov Aging ; 5(4): igab038, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34805555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Protecting nursing home and assisted living community residents during disasters continues to be a challenge. The present study explores the experiences of long-term care facilities in Florida that were exposed to Hurricane Irma in 2017. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used an abductive approach, combining induction and deduction. Interviews and focus groups beginning in May 2018 were conducted by telephone and in person with 89 administrative staff members representing 100 facilities (30 nursing homes and 70 assisted living communities). Analyses identified themes and subthemes. Findings were further analyzed using the social ecological model to better understand the preparedness and response of nursing homes and assisted living communities to Hurricane Irma. RESULTS: 3 main themes were identified including: (1) importance of collaborative relationships in anticipating needs and planning to shelter in place or evacuate; (2) efforts required to maintain safety and stability during an unprecedented event; and (3) effects, repercussions, and recommendations for change following the disaster. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Preparing for and managing disasters in nursing homes and assisted living communities involves actions within multiple environments beyond the residents and facilities where they live. Among these, community-level relationships are critical.

18.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(8): 2298-2305, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979461

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of Hurricane Irma on staff-related financial expenditures and daily direct-care nurse staffing levels. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: September 3-24, 2017 in the state of Florida, United States. Hurricane Irma made landfall on September 10, 2017. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and fifty-three nursing homes (NHs), 81 evacuated facilities, and 572 facilities that sheltered-in-place. MEASUREMENTS: This study used data from Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ), Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER), and Florida's health providers' emergency reporting system. PBJ provided estimates of daily direct-care nurse staffing levels for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants. CASPER reported facility-level characteristics such as profit status, chain membership, and special care unit availability. Florida's emergency reporting system identified evacuation status during Hurricane Irma. Linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the unique contribution of evacuation status on daily staffing increases over time from September 3 to 10. RESULTS: Among all facilities, we found significant increases in staffing for licensed practical nurses (p = 0.02) and certified nursing assistants (p < 0.001), but not for registered nurses (p = 0.10) before Hurricane Irma made landfall. From 1 week before landfall to 2 weeks after landfall (September 3-24), an additional estimated $2.41 million was spent on direct-care nurse staffing. In comparison to facilities that sheltered-in-place, evacuated facilities increased staffing levels of all nurse types (all p < 0.001). At landfall, evacuated facilities spent an estimated $93.74 on nurse staffing per resident whereas facilities that sheltered-in-place spent $76.10 on nurse staffing per resident. CONCLUSION: NHs face unprecedented challenges during hurricanes, including maintaining adequate direct-care nurse staffing levels to meet the needs of their residents. NHs that evacuated residents had an increase in direct-care nurse staffing that was greater than that seen in NHs that sheltered-in-place.


Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff/supply & distribution , Databases, Factual , Florida , Homes for the Aged/classification , Humans , Nursing Homes/classification , Nursing Staff/classification , Nursing Staff/economics , Retrospective Studies
19.
JAMA Health Forum ; 2(11): e213900, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977265

ABSTRACT

Importance: Exposure to hurricanes is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in nursing home (NH) residents, but the factors contributing to these outcomes are less understood. One hypothesized pathway could be power outages from hurricanes that expose NH residents to excess ambient heat. Objective: To determine the association of power loss from Hurricane Irma with hospitalization and mortality in NH residents in Florida. Design Setting and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of NH residents residing in Florida when Hurricane Irma landed on September 10, 2017, assessed mortality at 7 and 30 days after the storm and hospitalization at 30 days after the storm. The analysis was conducted from May 2, 2021, to June 28, 2021. All NH residents residing in Florida at landfall were eligible (N = 67 273). We excluded those younger than 65 years, missing power status information, or who were evacuated (13 178 [19.6%]). Exposure: We used state-administered surveys to determine NH power outage status. Exposed residents experienced a power outage poststorm, whereas unexposed residents did not experience a power outage poststorm. Main Outcomes and Measures: We used Medicare claims to assess mortality and hospitalization after Hurricane Irma landfall using generalized linear models with robust standard errors. Results: In the aftermath of Hurricane Irma, 27 892 residents (18 510 women [66.4%]; 3906 [14.0%] Black, 1651 [5.9%] Hispanic, and 21 756 [78.0%] White individuals) in 299 NHs were exposed to power loss and 26 203 residents (17 620 women [67.2%]; 4175 [15.9%] Black, 1030 [3.9%] Hispanic, and 20 477 [78.1%] White individuals) in 292 NHs were unexposed. Nursing homes that lost power were similar in size, quality star rating, and type of ownership compared with NHs that did not lose power. Power loss was associated with an increased adjusted odds of mortality among all residents within 7 days (odds ratio [OR],1.25; 95% CI,1.05-1.48) and 30 days (OR, 1.12; 95% CI,1.02-1.23) poststorm and hospitalization within 30 days, although only among residents aged 65 to 74 years (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.33). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, power loss was associated with higher odds of mortality in all affected NH residents and hospitalization in some residents. The benefits and costs of policies that require NHs to have emergency alternate power sources should be assessed.


Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Medicare , Nursing Homes , Retrospective Studies , United States
20.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 22(6): 1317-1321.e2, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309701

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report the initial compliance with new infection control regulations and geographic disparities in nursing homes (NHs) in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from November 27, 2017 to November 27, 2019. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 14,894 NHs in the continental United States comprising 26,201 inspections and 176,841 deficiencies. METHODS: We measured the cumulative incidence of receiving F880: Infection Prevention and Control deficiencies, geographic variability of F880 citations across the United States, and the scope and severity of the infection control deficiencies. RESULTS: A total of 6164 NHs (41%) in the continental United States received 1 deficiency for F880, and 2300 NHs (15%) were cited more than once during the 2-year period. Geographic variation was evident for F880 deficiencies, ranging from 20% of NHs in North Carolina to 79% of NHs in West Virginia. Between 0% (Vermont) and 33% (Michigan) of states' NHs were cited multiple times over 2 years. Facilities receiving 2 or more F880 deficiencies were more reliant on Medicaid, for-profit, and served more acute residents. Infection Prevention and Control deficiencies were of similar severity but of greater scope in NHs that were cited multiple times. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic challenges hospitals with an increased surge of patients from the community, NHs will be asked to accept convalescing patients who were previously infected with the virus. NHs will need to rely on infection control practices to mitigate the effects of the virus in their facilities. Particular attention to NHs that have fared poorly with repeat infection control practices deficiencies might be a good first step to improving care overall and preventing downstream morbidity and mortality among the highest-risk patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality of Health Care , Humans , Infection Control , North Carolina , Nursing Homes , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , West Virginia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...