Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Reprod Infant Psychol ; 35(1): 65-76, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29517291

ABSTRACT

The aims of the present study were to map French laypersons' views regarding the acceptability of maternal surrogacy and to delineate the circumstances under which surrogacy is considered, by different groups of people, as especially problematic. Participants (N = 236) were presented with a number of scenarios depicting the circumstances in which a couple has contracted with a surrogate mother and were asked to indicate the extent to which such a contract may present a moral problem. The scenarios were created by varying four factors: the type of surrogacy (traditional or gestational), the surrogate mother's level of autonomy, the family context in which the surrogate mother lives, and whether surrogacy was commercial or altruistic. Three qualitatively different personal positions were found: (a) a majority group for which surrogacy always (30%) or often (34%) presents a moral problem, (b) a minority group (14%) for which maternal surrogacy does not systematically present a moral problem, and


Subject(s)
Attitude , Contracts/legislation & jurisprudence , Morals , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Altruism , Contracts/economics , Female , France , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Young Adult
2.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 20(3): 158-69, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25545288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Are people's views on abortion as polarised as is suggested by the 'marches for life' that regularly take place in Paris and other capitals? Objective To map French people's positions regarding the acceptability of induced abortion. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine participants were presented with stories composed according to a three within-subject design: Reason for abortion (e.g., the woman's life is endangered) × Gestational age × Woman's age. They assessed the extent to which abortion would be, in each case, an acceptable medical/surgical procedure. RESULTS: Five qualitatively different positions were identified: (i) always acceptable, irrespective of circumstances (31% of the sample), (ii) strictly depends on the reason for abortion (27%), (iii) legalist (23%), (iv) depends on the reason and on the gestational age (18%), and (v) always unacceptable (1%). CONCLUSIONS: Only one-fifth of the participants agreed with the part of the French law that permits abortion on request when gestational age does not exceed ten weeks. The others disagreed either because they thought that abortion on demand should never be permitted or because they thought that the age limit should be extended. This divide in people's opinions guarantees that the debate over induced abortions will continue.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/psychology , Abortion, Legal/psychology , Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Public Opinion , Women's Health , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Legal/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Attitude to Health , Beginning of Human Life , Family Planning Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , France , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Social Stigma , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...