Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 7(9): e015815, 2017 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials can provide evidence relevant to assessing the equity impact of an intervention, but such information is often poorly reported. We describe a conceptual framework to identify health equity-relevant randomised trials with the aim of improving the design and reporting of such trials. METHODS: An interdisciplinary and international research team engaged in an iterative consensus building process to develop and refine the conceptual framework via face-to-face meetings, teleconferences and email correspondence, including findings from a validation exercise whereby two independent reviewers used the emerging framework to classify a sample of randomised trials. RESULTS: A randomised trial can usefully be classified as 'health equity relevant' if it assesses the effects of an intervention on the health or its determinants of either individuals or a population who experience ill health due to disadvantage defined across one or more social determinants of health. Health equity-relevant randomised trials can either exclusively focus on a single population or collect data potentially useful for assessing differential effects of the intervention across multiple populations experiencing different levels or types of social disadvantage. Trials that are not classified as 'health equity relevant' may nevertheless provide information that is indirectly relevant to assessing equity impact, including information about individual level variation unrelated to social disadvantage and potentially useful in secondary modelling studies. CONCLUSION: The conceptual framework may be used to design and report randomised trials. The framework could also be used for other study designs to contribute to the evidence base for improved health equity.


Subject(s)
Health Equity , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Research Design , Consensus , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Social Justice , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Res Integr Peer Rev ; 2: 15, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29451565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate reporting on sex and gender in health research is integral to ensuring that health interventions are safe and effective. In Canada and internationally, governments, research organizations, journal editors, and health agencies have called for more inclusive research, provision of sex-disaggregated data, and the integration of sex and gender analysis throughout the research process. Sex and gender analysis is generally defined as an approach for considering how and why different subpopulations (e.g., of diverse genders, ages, and social locations) may experience health conditions and interventions in different or similar ways.The objective of this study was to assess the extent and nature of reporting about sex and/or gender, including whether sex and gender analysis (SGA) was carried out in a sample of Canadian randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with human participants. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE from 01 January 2013 to 23 July 2014 using a validated filter for identification of RCTs, combined with terms related to Canada. Two reviewers screened the search results to identify the first 100 RCTs that were either identified in the trial publication as funded by a Canadian organization or which had a first or last author based in Canada. Data were independently extracted by two people from 10% of the RCTs during an initial training period; once agreement was reached on this sample, the remainder of the data extraction was completed by one person and verified by a second. RESULTS: The search yielded 1433 records. We screened 256 records to identify 100 RCTs which met our eligibility criteria. The median sample size of the RCTs was 107 participants (range 12-6085). While 98% of studies described the demographic composition of their participants by sex, only 6% conducted a subgroup analysis across sex and 4% reported sex-disaggregated data. No article defined "sex" and/or "gender." No publication carried out a comprehensive sex and gender analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight poor uptake of sex and gender considerations in the Canadian RCT context and underscore the need for better articulated guidance on sex and gender analysis to improve reporting of evidence, inform policy development, and guide future research.

3.
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can ; 36(4): 63-75, 2016 Apr.
Article in English, French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27077792

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Social media use has been increasing in public health and health promotion because it can remove geographic and physical access barriers. However, these interventions also have the potential to increase health inequities for people who do not have access to or do not use social media. In this paper, we aim to assess the effects of interactive social media interventions on health outcomes, behaviour change and health equity. METHODS: We conducted a rapid response overview of systematic reviews. We used a sensitive search strategy to identify systematic reviews and included those that focussed on interventions allowing two-way interaction such as discussion forums, social networks (e.g. Facebook and Twitter), blogging, applications linked to online communities and media sharing. RESULTS: Eleven systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Most interventions addressed by the reviews included online discussion boards or similar strategies, either as stand-alone interventions or in combination with other interventions. Seven reviews reported mixed effects on health outcomes and healthy behaviours. We did not find disaggregated analyses across characteristics associated with disadvantage, such as lower socioeconomic status or age. However, some targeted studies reported that social media interventions were effective in specific populations in terms of age, socioeconomic status, ethnicities and place of residence. Four reviews reported qualitative benefits such as satisfaction, finding information and improved social support. CONCLUSION: Social media interventions were effective in certain populations at risk for disadvantage (youth, older adults, low socioeconomic status, rural), which indicates that these interventions may be effective for promoting health equity. However, confirmation of effectiveness would require further study. Several reviews raised the issue of acceptability of social media interventions. Only four studies reported on the level of intervention use and all of these reported low use. More research on established social media platforms with existing social networks is needed, particularly in populations at risk for disadvantage, to assess effects on health outcomes and health equity.


TITRE: Interventions interactives dans les médias sociaux visant à promouvoir l'équité en matière de santé : vue d'ensemble des examens. INTRODUCTION: L'utilisation des médias sociaux en matière de santé publique et de promotion de la santé est en croissance, car ces outils permettent d'éliminer les barrières géographiques et physiques à l'accès aux services et aux soins de santé. Cependant, ils sont une source potentielle d'inégalité en matière de santé car une partie de la population n'y a pas accès ou ne les utilise pas. Cet article a comme objectif d'évaluer les effets des interventions interactives dans les médias sociaux sur les résultats sanitaires, les changements de comportement et l'équité en matière de santé. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons réalisé une synthèse rapide d'examens systématiques axés sur des interventions favorables aux interactions réciproques, que ce soit les forums de discussion, les réseaux sociaux (comme Facebook et Twitter), les blogues, les applications liées aux communautés électroniques ou le partage de contenu multimédia. Nous avons eu recours à une stratégie de recherche fine pour sélectionner les examens systématiques. RÉSULTATS: Onze examens systématiques ont répondu à nos critères d'inclusion. La plupart des interventions visées par ces examens visaient des groupes de discussion en ligne ou des outils similaires. Ces interventions étaient isolées ou conjointes à d'autres. Sept examens ont fait état d'effets mixtes sur les résultats sanitaires et les comportements sains. On n'a constaté aucune analyse détaillée des caractéristiques liées aux inconvénients, notamment un statut socioéconomique plus faible ou l'âge. Par contre, certaines études ciblées ont montré que les interventions dans les médias sociaux étaient efficaces pour certaines populations précises sur le plan de l'âge, du statut socioéconomique, de l'ethnicité et du lieu de résidence. Quatre examens ont fait état d'avantages qualitatifs, comme la satisfaction, le recueil d'information et l'amélioration du soutien social. CONCLUSION : Les interventions dans les médias sociaux se sont avérées efficaces pour certaines populations susceptibles d'être désavantagées (jeunes, aînés, personnes à faible statut socioéconomique et population rurale), ce qui prouve leur efficacité potentielle pour l'avancement de l'équité en matière de santé. La confirmation de cette efficacité nécessiterait toutefois une étude approfondie. Plusieurs examens ont soulevé la question de l'acceptabilité des interventions dans les médias sociaux. Seulement quatre études se sont penchées sur le niveau d'utilisation de l'intervention et elles ont toutes dévoilé un faible niveau d'utilisation. Il faudra réaliser d'autres travaux de recherche sur les plateformes des principaux médias sociaux actuels, particulièrement auprès des populations risquant d'être désavantagées, afin d'évaluer leurs effets sur les résultats sanitaires et l'équité en matière de santé.


Subject(s)
Health Equity , Health Promotion/methods , Social Media , Health Behavior , Humans , Program Evaluation , Review Literature as Topic
4.
New York; Implementation Science; 2016. 14 p.
Monography in English | PIE | ID: biblio-1008438

ABSTRACT

Systematic reviews are important for decision makers. They offer many potential benefits but are often written in technical language, are too long, and do not contain contextual details which make them hard to use for decision-making. There are many organizations that develop and disseminate derivative products, such as evidence summaries, from systematic reviews for different populations or subsets of decision makers. This systematic review aimed to (1) assess the effectiveness of evidence summaries on policymakers' use of the evidence and (2) identify the most effective summary components for increasing policymakers' use of the evidence. We present an overview of the available evidence on systematic review derivative products.


Subject(s)
Humans , Health Systems/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Evidence-Informed Policy , Review Literature as Topic
5.
Implement Sci ; 10: 146, 2015 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26490367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health equity concerns the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in health. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can provide evidence about the impact of an intervention on health equity for specific disadvantaged populations or in general populations; this is important for equity-focused decision-making. Previous work has identified a lack of adequate reporting guidelines for assessing health equity in RCTs. The objective of this study is to develop guidelines to improve the reporting of health equity considerations in RCTs, as an extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). METHODS/DESIGN: A six-phase study using integrated knowledge translation governed by a study executive and advisory board will assemble empirical evidence to inform the CONSORT-equity extension. To create the guideline, the following steps are proposed: (1) develop a conceptual framework for identifying "equity-relevant trials," (2) assess empirical evidence regarding reporting of equity-relevant trials, (3) consult with global methods and content experts on how to improve reporting of health equity in RCTs, (4) collect broad feedback and prioritize items needed to improve reporting of health equity in RCTs, (5) establish consensus on the CONSORT-equity extension: the guideline for equity-relevant trials, and (6) broadly disseminate and implement the CONSORT-equity extension. DISCUSSION: This work will be relevant to a broad range of RCTs addressing questions of effectiveness for strategies to improve practice and policy in the areas of social determinants of health, clinical care, health systems, public health, and international development, where health and/or access to health care is a primary outcome. The outcomes include a reporting guideline (CONSORT-equity extension) for equity-relevant RCTs and a knowledge translation strategy to broadly encourage its uptake and use by journal editors, authors, and funding agencies.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Health Equity/standards , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Design , Age Factors , Culture , Humans , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
J Magn Reson ; 167(1): 97-106, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14987603

ABSTRACT

Measuring the water diffusivity in porous building materials with NMR is hindered by the presence of large internal magnetic field gradients originating from magnetic impurities (Fe). To investigate the diffusion of water in these materials, a stimulated echo NMR technique is applied. A new analytical equation for the long-time signal decay in the presence of spatially varying internal field gradients is derived. This equation is experimentally confirmed by measurements on representative materials with large internal gradients (fired-clay brick and sintered crushed glass) and a material with very small internal gradients (glass filter). The diffusivity is determined in the long time limit, where it is constant and limited by the tortuosity of the pore structure. Tortuosities of different samples derived from the NMR data show an excellent agreement with the macroscopic tortuosities measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The developed technique can also be applied in unsaturated media, during e.g., drying, water absorption, and concentration changes. The characteristic length scales of the internal field fluctuations estimated from the model are compared with the structural length scales, whereas the magnitude of these fluctuations is compared with results of macroscopic magnetization measurements.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Construction Materials/analysis , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Materials Testing/methods , Porosity , Water/analysis , Water/chemistry , Aluminum Silicates/analysis , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Clay , Diffusion , Electromagnetic Fields , Glass/analysis , Glass/chemistry , Magnetics , Membranes, Artificial , Models, Chemical , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
Acta Chir Iugosl ; 36 Suppl 1: 73-6, 1989.
Article in Croatian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2618376

ABSTRACT

In this report the authors took all material found on KBC Zemun for period from 1968 to 1988 on 43 causes traumatic rupture of diaphragms treated on this clinic. On their own experience and taking the experience of the others the authors found that: Traumatic rupture of diaphragm is a consequence of thoracoabdominal compressive trauma, which it accompanies in 3% of cases. Any traumatic rupture of diaphragm is an acute surgical state which requires an urgent surgical treatment. No other treatment is justified. Radiological method is applied in diagnosing the traumatic rupture of diaphragm. The surgical operation ought to secure a good detection of accompanying injuries. They are surgically taken care of by breaking the communication between the two cavities and, by providing their proper drainage. The major factor causing this type of traumatism presents the traffic accidents. The death rate with these traumas is very high and largely depending on accompanying injuries, reaching 20.9% in the material that we studied.


Subject(s)
Diaphragm/injuries , Accidents, Traffic , Diaphragm/surgery , Humans , Multiple Trauma/pathology , Rupture
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...