ABSTRACT
Background: Cholecystectomy has been a subject of debate regarding its timing and utility in cases of mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to critically evaluate the role of early cholecystectomy in the management of mild and moderate AP, considering patient's characteristics, associated procedures, and overall impact on patient outcomes. Methods: The study compared the outcomes between patients admitted in a tertiary care surgical center undergoing early ( 96h) versus delayed ( 96h) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for mild and moderately severe acute gallstone pancreatitis between January 2019 and December 2022. Results: The study included 54 cases [mean (standard deviation) age, 59.4 (16.5) years; 31 (57.4%) years females]. All patients underwent LC, with 29 cases undergoing a two-phase therapeutic regimen for common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis, consisting of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by sequential LC. The early cholecystectomy group (EC) comprised 17 patients (31.5%), while the delayed cholecystectomy group (DC) included 37 patients (68.5%). EC was significantly correlated with lower length of stay (p-value 0.0001) and significantly lower rate of ERCP usage during perioperative period. Conclusions: EC in the first 4 days after admission provides significant benefits such as prevention of recurrent pancreatitis, reduction in complications, and decreased length of stay for patients with mild and moderately severe AP.
Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Gallstones , Length of Stay , Pancreatitis , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Retrospective Studies , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Pancreatitis/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Gallstones/surgery , Gallstones/complications , Acute Disease , Time-to-TreatmentABSTRACT
We here draw attention to a practical issue: the approach to certain unusual gastric ulcers with haemorrhage- or perforation-induced complications. This category of ulcers, i.e., giant (over 2-3 cm) and multiple ulcers, is rarely encountered. We discuss the circumstances determining the occurrence of such lesions, their diverse aetiology and pathogenesis, their common manifestations, and the severity of their evolution. Some of the lesions are benign (chronic or acute ulcers), whereas others are neoplastic: carcinoma, stromal tumours, and lymphomas. In gastric ulcers, the characteristics of this particular and rare category of lesions strictly places them in the surgical field, requiring primary surgical intention. Conservative treatments are not effective in such cases, and preoperative biopsies are not appropriate for emergency interventions. Whether these unusual ulcers are benign or malign, they need to be surgically removed.
