ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) represents a standard of care to treat some acute respiratory failure (ARF). Data on its use in pneumonia are lacking, especially in a setting outside the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The aims of this study were to evaluate the use of NIV in ARF due to pneumonia outside the ICU, and to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Prospective, observational study performed in 19 centers in Italy. Patients with ARF due to pneumonia treated outside the ICU with either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) were enrolled over a period of at least 3 consecutive months in 2013. Independent factors related to in-hospital mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 347 patients enrolled, CPAP was applied as first treatment in 176 (50.7%) patients,NPPV in 171 (49.3%). The NPPV compared with CPAP group showed a significant higher PaCO2 (55 [47-78] vs 37 [32-43] mmHg, pâ¯<â¯0.001), a lower arterial pH (7.30 [7.21-7.37] vs 7.43 [7.35-7.47], pâ¯<â¯0.001), higher HCO3- (28 [24-33] vs 24 [21-27] mmol/L, pâ¯<â¯0.001). De-novo ARF was more prevalent in CPAP group than in NPPV group (86/176 vs 31/171 patients,pâ¯<â¯0.001). In-hospital mortality was 23% (83/347). Do Not Intubate (DNI) order and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3 were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Outside ICU setting, CPAP was used mainly for hypoxemic non-hypercapnic ARF, NPPV for hypercapnic ARF. In-hospital mortality was mainly associated to patients' basal status (DNI status, CCI) rather than the baseline degree of ARF.
Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Pneumonia/complications , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypercapnia/complications , Italy/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the past three decades conflicting evidences have been published on the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). The aim of this study is to describe the management of acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to ACPE in twelve Italian emergency departments (EDs). We evaluated prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of ACPE patients treated with oxygen therapy, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) on admission to the EDs. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, consecutive adult patients with ACPE were enrolled in 12 EDs in Italy from May 2009 to December 2013. Three study groups were identified according to the initial respiratory treatment: patients receiving oxygen therapy, those treated with CPAP and those treated with BiPAP. Treatment failure was evaluated as study outcome. RESULTS: We enrolled 1293 patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. 273 (21%) began with oxygen, 788 (61%) with CPAP and 232 (18%) with BiPAP. One out of four patient who began with oxygen was subsequently switched to NIV and initial treatment with oxygen therapy had an odds ratio for treatment failure of 3.65 (95% CI: 2.55-5.23, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NIV seems to be the first choice for treatment of ARF due to ACPE, showing high clinical effectiveness and representing a rescue option for patients not improving with conventional oxygen therapy.
