Human CD8 responses to a complete epitope set from preproinsulin: implications for approaches to epitope discovery.

PURPOSE: In this study, we explored the breadth of CD8 T cell reactivity to preproinsulin (PPI) in type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested a complete peptide set in pools covering all 406 potential 8-11mer epitopes of PPI and 61 algorithm-predicted human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-specific epitopes (15 pools) from islet-specific glucose-6-phophatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP), using a CD8-specific granzyme B enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. RESULTS: Responses were seen to 64 of the 102 PPI pools in two or more newly diagnosed patients (63%) compared to 11 pools in the control subjects (11%, p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). We identified five pools containing 20 peptides, which distinguished patients from control subjects, most of which had predicted low-affinity binding to HLA class I molecules. In contrast, fewer (5 of 15 = 33%) IGRP peptide pools, selected by higher binding affinity for HLA-A2 (present in seven of eight patients and five of seven control subjects), stimulated responses in two or more patients, and none stimulated responses in more than two control subjects (p = 0.042, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Thus, we conclude that CD8 T cell reactivity to PPI in patients with type 1 diabetes can be much broader than shown previously and more diverse than seen in control subjects. Furthermore, responses were often stimulated by peptides with low predicted HLA-binding affinities.

Functional inhibition related to structure of a highly potent insulin-specific CD8 T cell clone using altered peptide ligands.

Insulin-reactive CD8 T cells are amongst the earliest islet-infiltrating CD8 T cells in NOD mice. Cloned insulin B15-23-reactive cells (designated G9C8), restricted by H-2K(d), are highly diabetogenic. We used altered peptide ligands (APL) substituted at TCR contact sites, positions (p)6 and 8, to investigate G9C8 T cell function and correlated this with structure. Cytotoxicity and IFN-gamma production assays revealed that p6G and p8R could not be replaced by any naturally occurring amino acid without abrogating recognition and functional response by the G9C8 clone. When tested for antagonist activity with APL differing from the native peptide at either of these positions, the peptide variants, G6H and R8L showed the capacity to reduce the agonist response to the native peptide. The antagonist activity in cytotoxicity and IFN-gamma production assays can be correlated with conformational changes induced by different structures of the MHC-peptide complexes, shown by molecular modeling. We conclude that p6 and p8 of the insulin B15-23 peptide are very important for TCR stimulation of this clone and no substitutions are tolerated at these positions in the peptide. This is important in considering the therapeutic use of peptides as APL that encompass both CD4 and CD8 epitopes of insulin.

CD86 has sustained costimulatory effects on CD8 T cells.

CD80 and CD86 both costimulate T cell activation. Their individual effects in vivo are difficult to study as they are coordinately up-regulated on APCs. We have studied mice expressing rat insulin promoter (RIP)-CD80 and RIP-CD86 on the NOD and NOD.scid genetic background to generate in vivo models, using diabetes as a readout for cytotoxic T cell activation. Accelerated spontaneous diabetes onset was observed in NOD-RIP-CD80 mice and the transfer of diabetes from 6-wk-old NOD mice to NOD.scid-RIP-CD80 mice was greater compared with NOD-RIP-CD86 and NOD.scid-RIP-CD86 mice, respectively. However, the secondary in vivo response was maintained if T cells were activated through CD86 costimulation compared with CD80. This was demonstrated by greater ability to cause recurrent diabetes in NOD-RIP-CD86 diabetic mice transplanted with 6-wk-old NOD islets and adoptively transferred diabetes from diabetic NOD-RIP-CD86 mice to NOD.scid mice. In vitro, CD80 costimulation enhanced cytotoxicity, proliferation, and cytokine secretion in activated CD8 T cells compared with CD86 costimulation. We demonstrated increased CTLA-4 and programmed death-1 inhibitory molecule expression following costimulation by both CD80 and CD86 (CD80 > CD86). Furthermore, T cells stimulated by CD80 were more susceptible to inhibition by CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. Overall, while CD86 does not stimulate an initial response as strongly as CD80, there is greater sustained activity that is seen even in the absence of continued costimulation. These functions have implications for the engineered use of costimulatory molecules in altering immune responses in a therapeutic setting.