The effect of prosthetic margin location on caries susceptibility. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prosthetic margin location relevant to the free gingival margin may influence the incidence of secondary caries due to the differences that exist between the micro-environment within the gingival crevice compared to the rest of the oral environment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effect of prosthetic margin placement on caries susceptibility of abutment teeth. METHOD: Two independent authors identified cohort studies using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CDSR, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and Scopus through March 2012. Reference lists were also scanned. Included studies had to report on caries incidence with regard to location of prosthetic margins, with a minimum follow-up period of two years. RESULTS: A total of 5,541 references were identified and, after application of the inclusion criteria, 22 studies were included in the systematic review. Random-effects meta-analysis could be made in two studies, in which secondary caries incidence did not differ between margins placed subgingivally compared to equi- or supragingivally placed margins for a follow-up period up to ten years. Indications were found of a possible lower secondary caries rate at 15 years of follow up, based on one study. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis failed to detect a significantly different secondary caries rate of subgingivally located prosthetic margins in the short to mid-term (≤10 years). Due to the small number and the limitations of the included studies the results do not provide conclusive evidence as to the effect of prosthetic margin placement on the incidence of secondary caries.

The influence of age on tooth supported fixed prosthetic restoration longevity. A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible influence of age on the longevity of tooth supported fixed prosthetic restorations, using a systematic review process. DATA SOURCES: To identify relevant papers an electronic search was made using various databases (MEDLINE via Pubmed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Register of RCTs, the database of abstracts of Reviews of Effects-DARE), augmented by hand searching of key prosthodontic journals (International Journal of Prosthodontics, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry and Journal of Prosthodontics) and reference cross-check. STUDY SELECTION: Assessment and selection of studies identified were conducted in a two phase procedure, by two independent reviewers utilizing specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The minimum mean follow-up time was set at 5 years. RESULTS: The initial database search yielded 513 relevant titles. After the subsequent filtering process, 22 articles were selected for full-text analysis, finally resulting in 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria. All studies were classified as category C according to the strength of evidence. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the non-uniformity of the data available. The final studies were presented with conflicting results. The majority of the final studies did not report a statistically significant effect of age on fixed prostheses survival, whilst only one study reported poorer prognosis for elderly patients, and two studies reported poorer prognosis for middle-aged patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review showed that increased age of patients should not be considered as a risk factor for the survival of fixed prostheses. Although the majority of studies did not show any effect of age on the survival of fixed prostheses, there was some evidence that middle-aged patients may present with higher failure rates.