ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Blood conservation with antifibrinolytics, topical hemostatics, and strict transfusion triggers are becoming commonplace in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a blood conservation protocol centering on standardized intraoperative autologous blood donation (IAD) use in cardiac surgery. METHODS: We reviewed charts of patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital over an 8-year period to analyze transfusion tendencies before and after a new blood conservation policy was implemented. Propensity score matching was used to account for population differences in preoperative and perioperative covariates. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period (January 2009 to December 2017) 1002 patients were studied. Three hundred fifty-two patients before the new blood conservation policy (group 1) were compared with 650 patients after the change (group 2). Fewer group 2 patients required blood transfusions during their hospital stay (78% vs 61%, P < .001), were transfused fewer units (2.8 vs 1.81 units, P < .001), and experienced a shorter length of stay (8.02 vs 7.28 days, P = .012). Propensity score-matched cohorts revealed reductions in any complication (29.5% vs 18.8%, P = .007), fewer postoperative transfusions (70.1% vs 50.9%, P < .001), and a lower transfusion volume (1.82 vs 1.21 units, P = .002) associated with IAD without any associated change in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: IAD use is associated with reduced transfusions in cardiac surgery and may be considered a complementary aspect of blood conservation. Our experience suggests it may be applied with few limitations. A causal relationship between IAD and outcomes should be established with prospective studies.
