Updated feasibility and reproducibility results of multi-institutional study of noninvasive breast tumor bed boost.

PURPOSE: To report updated feasibility and reproducibility results for high-dose-rate noninvasive breast brachytherapy (NIBB) for tumor bed boost with whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) in the setting of expanded patient and treatment facility number. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen independent community-based and academic centers reported 518 early-stage breast cancer patients from July 2007 to February 2015 on a privacy-encrypted online data registry. All patients' treatment included lumpectomy followed by combination of WBRT and NIBB. NIBB was completed with commercially available (AccuBoost, Billerica, MA) mammography-based system using high-dose-rate 192Ir emissions along orthogonal axes. Harvard scale was used to grade cosmesis. RESULTS: Total patient cohort had median followup of 12 months (1-75 months) with subset of 268 having available cosmesis. Greater than 2- and 3-year followup was 29% and 14%, respectively. Entire cohort had 97.4% excellent/good (E/G) breast cosmesis and freedom from recurrence of 97.6% at the final followup. WBRT timing with respect to NIBB delivery demonstrated no statistically significant difference in E/G cosmesis. Achieved E/G cosmesis rate was also not statistically significant (χ2p-value = 0.86) between academic and community institutions with 97.8% vs. 96.6%. CONCLUSIONS: NIBB represents an alternative method for delivery of breast tumor cavity boost that has shown feasibility in a diverse group of both academic and community-based practices with reproducible early cosmesis and tumor control results. Recommendations are updated noting ideal timing of boost delivery likely to be before or early during WBRT given equal cosmesis and less documented treatment discomfort.

Seed loss through the urinary tract after prostate brachytherapy: examining the role of cystoscopy and urine straining post implant.

This study describes one institution's experience with seed retrieval through the urinary tract and makes recommendations for cystoscopy and urine straining post prostate brachytherapy (PB). 1794 patients from two separate cohorts covering different time periods (early versus late) were analyzed. All patients were preplanned with a modified peripheral loading technique and implanted with preloaded needles (125I or 103Pd) under ultrasound guidance. A catheter was used to delineate the urethra during the volume study but was not used during the implant. All patients underwent post implant cystoscopy. All patients were instructed to strain their urine for seven days post implant and return any seeds to our center. In our experience, seed loss through the urinary tract is a common event after PB, occurring in 29.7% of patients and was more common in patients from the early cohort, those implanted with 125I seeds or those patients with prior transurethral resection of the prostate. Average seed loss per case, however, represents only 0.58% of total activity. We continue to recommend routine post implant cystoscopy for seed retrieval and periprocedural management. We no longer recommend that patients strain their urine at home after documenting a low rate of seed loss after discharge.