Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1223199, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37920169

ABSTRACT

Central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms are difficult to treat due to their sensitive location. Over the past two decades, the availability of patient tumor materials facilitated large scale genomic and epigenomic profiling studies, which have resulted in detailed insights into the molecular underpinnings of CNS tumorigenesis. Based on results from these studies, CNS tumors have high molecular and cellular intra-tumoral and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. CNS cancer models have yet to reflect the broad diversity of CNS tumors and patients and the lack of such faithful cancer models represents a major bottleneck to urgently needed innovations in CNS cancer treatment. Pediatric cancer model development is lagging behind adult tumor model development, which is why we focus this review on CNS tumors mutated for BRAFV600E which are more prevalent in the pediatric patient population. BRAFV600E-mutated CNS tumors exhibit high inter-tumoral heterogeneity, encompassing clinically and histopathological diverse tumor types. Moreover, BRAFV600E is the second most common alteration in pediatric low-grade CNS tumors, and low-grade tumors are notoriously difficult to recapitulate in vitro and in vivo. Although the mutation predominates in low-grade CNS tumors, when combined with other mutations, most commonly CDKN2A deletion, BRAFV600E-mutated CNS tumors are prone to develop high-grade features, and therefore BRAFV600E-mutated CNS are a paradigm for tumor progression. Here, we describe existing in vitro and in vivo models of BRAFV600E-mutated CNS tumors, including patient-derived cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, syngeneic models, and genetically engineered mouse models, along with their advantages and shortcomings. We discuss which research gaps each model might be best suited to answer, and identify those areas in model development that need to be strengthened further. We highlight areas of potential research focus that will lead to the heightened predictive capacity of preclinical studies, allow for appropriate validation, and ultimately improve the success of "bench to bedside" translational research.

3.
Cell Rep ; 38(7): 110375, 2022 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172155

ABSTRACT

Branching morphogenesis is a fundamental process by which organs in invertebrates and vertebrates form branches to expand their surface areas. The current dogma holds that directional cell migration determines where a new branch forms and thus patterns branching. Here, we asked whether mouse Lgl1, a homolog of the Drosophila tumor suppressor Lgl, regulates epithelial polarity in the mammary gland. Surprisingly, mammary glands lacking Lgl1 have normal epithelial polarity, but they form fewer branches. Moreover, we find that Lgl1 null epithelium is unable to directionally migrate, suggesting that migration is not essential for mammary epithelial branching as expected. We show that LGL1 binds to Integrin ß1 and inhibits its downstream signaling, and Integrin ß1 overexpression blocks epithelial migration, thus recapitulating the Lgl1 null phenotype. Altogether, we demonstrate that Lgl1 modulation of Integrin ß1 signaling is essential for directional migration and that epithelial branching in invertebrates and the mammary gland is fundamentally distinct.


Subject(s)
Epithelium , Glycoproteins , Integrin beta1 , Mammary Glands, Animal , Morphogenesis , Signal Transduction , Animals , Cell Movement/genetics , Cell Polarity , Cell Proliferation , Down-Regulation , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelium/growth & development , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glycoproteins/metabolism , Integrin beta1/metabolism , Mammary Glands, Animal/growth & development , Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism , Mice, Transgenic , Models, Biological , Protein Binding
4.
Int J Cancer ; 145(7): 1889-1901, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30861105

ABSTRACT

This clinical trial evaluated whether whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of paired normal and tumor tissues could be incorporated into a personalized treatment plan for newly diagnosed patients (<25 years of age) with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Additionally, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was compared to WES to determine if WGS would further inform treatment decisions, and whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could detect the H3K27M mutation to allow assessment of therapy response. Patients were selected across three Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium member institutions between September 2014 and January 2016. WES and RNAseq were performed at diagnosis and recurrence when possible in a CLIA-certified laboratory. Patient-derived cell line development was attempted for each subject. Collection of blood for ctDNA was done prior to treatment and with each MRI. A specialized tumor board generated a treatment recommendation including up to four FDA-approved agents based upon the genomic alterations detected. A treatment plan was successfully issued within 21 business days from tissue collection for all 15 subjects, with 14 of the 15 subjects fulfilling the feasibility criteria. WGS results did not significantly deviate from WES-based therapy recommendations; however, WGS data provided further insight into tumor evolution and fidelity of patient-derived cell models. Detection of the H3F3A or HIST1H3B K27M (H3K27M) mutation using ctDNA was successful in 92% of H3K27M mutant cases. A personalized treatment recommendation for DIPG can be rendered within a multicenter setting using comprehensive next-generation sequencing technology in a clinically relevant timeframe.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brain Stem Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma/drug therapy , Exome Sequencing/methods , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Stem Neoplasms/genetics , Child , Child, Preschool , Circulating Tumor DNA , Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Histones/genetics , Humans , Male , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Pilot Projects , Precision Medicine , Young Adult
5.
Nat Commun ; 9(1): 2862, 2018 08 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131568

ABSTRACT

Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC) undergo asymmetric cell division (ACD) to generate one OPC and one differentiating oligodendrocyte (OL) progeny. Loss of pro-mitotic proteoglycan and OPC marker NG2 in the OL progeny is the earliest immunophenotypic change of unknown mechanism that indicates differentiation commitment. Here, we report that expression of the mouse homolog of Drosophila tumor suppressor Lethal giant larvae 1 (Lgl1) is induced during OL differentiation. Lgl1 conditional knockout OPC progeny retain NG2 and show reduced OL differentiation, while undergoing more symmetric self-renewing divisions at the expense of asymmetric divisions. Moreover, Lgl1 and hemizygous Ink4a/Arf knockouts in OPC synergistically induce gliomagenesis. Time lapse and total internal reflection microscopy reveals a critical role for Lgl1 in NG2 endocytic routing and links aberrant NG2 recycling to failed differentiation. These data establish Lgl1 as a suppressor of gliomagenesis and positive regulator of asymmetric division and differentiation in the healthy and demyelinated murine brain.


Subject(s)
Glycoproteins/metabolism , Oligodendroglia/cytology , Oligodendroglia/metabolism , Proteoglycans/metabolism , Animals , Asymmetric Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Glycoproteins/genetics , Immunoblotting , Mice , Monensin/pharmacology , Oligodendroglia/drug effects , Signal Transduction/drug effects
6.
Results Probl Cell Differ ; 61: 375-399, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28409314

ABSTRACT

Stem and progenitor cells are characterized by their abilities to self-renew and produce differentiated progeny. The balance between self-renewal and differentiation is achieved through control of cell division mode, which can be either asymmetric or symmetric. Failure to properly control cell division mode may result in premature depletion of the stem/progenitor cell pool or abnormal growth and impaired differentiation. In many tissues, including the brain, stem cells and progenitor cells undergo asymmetric cell division through the establishment of cell polarity. Cell polarity proteins are therefore potentially critical regulators of asymmetric cell division. Decrease or loss of asymmetric cell division can be associated with reduced differentiation common during aging or impaired remyelination as seen in demyelinating diseases. Progenitor-like glioma precursor cells show decreased asymmetric cell division rates and increased symmetric divisions, which suggests that asymmetric cell division suppresses brain tumor formation. Cancer stem cells, on the other hand, still undergo low rates of asymmetric cell division, which may provide them with a survival advantage during therapy. These findings led to the hypotheses that asymmetric cell divisions are not always tumor suppressive but can also be utilized to maintain a cancer stem cell population. Proper control of cell division mode is therefore not only deemed necessary to generate cellular diversity during development and to maintain adult tissue homeostasis but may also prevent disease and determine disease progression. Since brain cancer is most common in the adult and aging population, we review here the current knowledge on molecular mechanisms that regulate asymmetric cell divisions in the neural and oligodendroglial lineage during development and in the adult brain.


Subject(s)
Asymmetric Cell Division/physiology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/cytology , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Animals , Humans
7.
Oncotarget ; 7(46): 75839-75853, 2016 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27713119

ABSTRACT

Inhibitors of BRAFV600E kinase are currently under investigations in preclinical and clinical studies involving BRAFV600E glioma. Studies demonstrated clinical response to such individualized therapy in the majority of patients whereas in some patients tumors continue to grow despite treatment. To study resistance mechanisms, which include feedback activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling in melanoma, we developed a luciferase-modified cell line (2341luc) from a BrafV600E mutant and Cdkn2a- deficient murine high-grade glioma, and analyzed its molecular responses to BRAFV600E- and MAPK kinase (MEK)-targeted inhibition. Immunocompetent, syngeneic FVB/N mice with intracranial grafts of 2341luc were tested for effects of BRAFV600E and MEK inhibitor treatments, with bioluminescence imaging up to 14-days after start of treatment and survival analysis as primary indicators of inhibitor activity. Intracranial injected tumor cells consistently generated high-grade glioma-like tumors in syngeneic mice. Intraperitoneal daily delivery of BRAFV600E inhibitor dabrafenib only transiently suppressed MAPK signaling, and rather increased Akt signaling and failed to extend survival for mice with intracranial 2341luc tumor. MEK inhibitor trametinib delivered by oral gavage daily suppressed MAPK pathway more effectively and had a more durable anti-growth effect than dabrafenib as well as a significant survival benefit. Compared with either agent alone, combined BRAFV600E and MEK inhibitor treatment was more effective in reducing tumor growth and extending animal subject survival, as corresponding to sustained MAPK pathway inhibition. Results derived from the 2341luc engraftment model application have clinical implications for the management of BRAFV600E glioma.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Glioma/genetics , Glioma/metabolism , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Codon , Disease Models, Animal , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Gene Expression , Gene Knockout Techniques , Genotype , Glioma/drug therapy , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Mice , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Mutation , Neoplasm Grading , Transplantation, Isogeneic
8.
Clin Cancer Res ; 22(21): 5312-5321, 2016 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27217440

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Alteration of the BRAF/MEK/MAPK pathway is the hallmark of pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs), and mTOR activation has been documented in the majority of these tumors. We investigated combinations of MEK1/2, BRAFV600E and mTOR inhibitors in gliomas carrying specific genetic alterations of the MAPK pathway. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used human glioma lines containing BRAFV600E (adult high-grade: AM-38, DBTRG, PLGG: BT40), or wild-type BRAF (pediatric high-grade: SF188, SF9427, SF8628) and isogenic systems of KIAA1549:BRAF-expressing NIH/3T3 cells and BRAFV600E-expressing murine brain cells. Signaling inhibitors included everolimus (mTOR), PLX4720 (BRAFV600E), and AZD6244 (MEK1/2). Proliferation was determined using ATP-based assays. In vivo inhibitor activities were assessed in the BT40 PLGG xenograft model. RESULTS: In BRAFV600E cells, the three possible doublet combinations of AZD6244, everolimus, and PLX4720 exhibited significantly greater effects on cell viability. In BRAFWT cells, everolimus + AZD6244 was superior compared with respective monotherapies. Similar results were found using isogenic murine cells. In KIAA1549:BRAF cells, MEK1/2 inhibition reduced cell viability and S-phase content, effects that were modestly augmented by mTOR inhibition. In vivo experiments in the BRAFV600E pediatric xenograft model BT40 showed the greatest survival advantage in mice treated with AZD6244 + PLX4720 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In BRAFV600E tumors, combination of AZD6244 + PLX4720 is superior to monotherapy and to other combinatorial approaches. In BRAFWT pediatric gliomas, everolimus + AZD6244 is superior to either agent alone. KIAA1549:BRAF-expressing tumors display marked sensitivity to MEK1/2 inhibition. Application of these results to PLGG treatment must be exercised with caution because the dearth of PLGG models necessitated only a single patient-derived PLGG (BT40) in this study. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5312-21. ©2016 AACR.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Glioma/drug therapy , Glioma/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/metabolism , Animals , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Humans , Indoles/pharmacology , MAP Kinase Kinase 1/metabolism , MAP Kinase Kinase 2/metabolism , Mice , NIH 3T3 Cells , S Phase/drug effects , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism
9.
Cancer Res ; 75(24): 5355-66, 2015 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26573800

ABSTRACT

The treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) remains challenging in part due to the presence of stem-like tumor-propagating cells that are resistant to standard therapies consisting of radiation and temozolomide. Among the novel and targeted agents under evaluation for the treatment of GBM are BRAF/MAPK inhibitors, but their effects on tumor-propagating cells are unclear. Here, we characterized the behaviors of CD133(+) tumor-propagating cells isolated from primary GBM cell lines. We show that CD133(+) cells exhibited decreased sensitivity to the antiproliferative effects of BRAF/MAPK inhibition compared to CD133(-) cells. Furthermore, CD133(+) cells exhibited an extended G2-M phase and increased polarized asymmetric cell divisions. At the molecular level, we observed that polo-like kinase (PLK) 1 activity was elevated in CD133(+) cells, prompting our investigation of BRAF/PLK1 combination treatment effects in an orthotopic GBM xenograft model. Combined inhibition of BRAF and PLK1 resulted in significantly greater antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects beyond those achieved by monotherapy (P < 0.05). We propose that PLK1 activity controls a polarity checkpoint and compensates for BRAF/MAPK inhibition in CD133(+) cells, suggesting the need for concurrent PLK1 inhibition to improve antitumor activity against a therapy-resistant cell compartment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Cycle Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Glioblastoma/pathology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Polarity/drug effects , Cell Separation , Flow Cytometry , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Mice , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Polo-Like Kinase 1
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...