The AAOS 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rotator Cuff Injuries Are Unbiased and Incorporate a Diverse Body of Literature.

Purpose: To analyze the scientific research that formed the basis of the 2019 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines for the management of rotator cuff injuries. Methods: All studies cited in the 2019 AAOS clinical practice guidelines for the management of rotator cuff injuries were extracted and categorized. Extracted data included type of study, number of patients, level of evidence, journal of publication, impact factor, year of publication, country of origin, contributing authors, affiliated institutions, and significant findings. Data were analyzed to determine time from publication to implementation, level of evidence, and frequency of cited journals and authors. Results: The studies cited in the guideline included 15,130 patients from 140 studies published between 1994 and 2018. The overall mean time from article publication to 2019 AAOS clinical practice guidelines was 4.76 ± 2.23 years. Of articles published in 2010 to 2019, 64 studies were cited in the strong recommendation strength subcategory, and 57 articles were cited in the moderate recommendation strength subcategory. Articles published in Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery and Arthroscopy were cited most frequently. The most frequent authors were J. H. Oh, R. Z. Tashjian, S. H. Kim, N. Maffulli, and J. C. Yoo. Conclusions: The 2019 AAOS CPG reference a diverse number of journals and authors, appearing to be impartial. Furthermore, prompt time from publication to implementation in the Guidelines indicates that it is possible to influence clinical guidelines with recent work. Clinical Relevance: An analysis of the scientific research that forms the basis of the AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rotator Cuff Injuries can provide valuable information about the quality of the Guidelines.

Predictors of Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Colonization in Joint Arthroplasty Patients.

Early identification and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) nasal colonization can reduce the risk of prosthetic joint infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-specific predictors for S. aureus nasal colonization in total joint arthroplasty patients to aid in preoperative screening protocols. A total of 2,147 arthroplasty patients who were preoperatively screened for S. aureus nasal colonization were retrospectively reviewed. Factors analyzed consisted of procedure type, primary diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, use of immunosuppression medication, smoking history, and chronic kidney disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with significance p < 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals. Overall, 3.7% (79) of our cohort tested positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and 23.2% (493) tested positive for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Independent predictors for MRSA colonization were of Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 13.98, confidence interval [CI] 2.97-65.76), immunosuppression medication use (p = 0.006, OR 2.82, CI 1.35-5.87), and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedure (p < 0.001, OR 7.51, CI 2.58-21.89). Independent predictors for MSSA colonization were body mass index (BMI) >35 (p = 0.002, OR 1.57, CI 1.19-2.1). Variables were found to be protective against MSSA colonization including female gender (p = 0.012, OR 0.76, CI 0.61-0.94), age 60 to 69 (p = 0.025, OR 0.75, CI 0.58-0.96), and age 70 to 79 (p = 0.002, OR 0.63, CI 0.47-0.84). Age, Hispanic ethnicity, gender, revision THA, use of immunosuppression medication, and elevated BMI were independent risk factors for S. aureus nasal colonization.

Patient Satisfaction After Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Medical Comorbidities and Patient Demographics.

The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey has received increased attention to determine which demographics may influence patient satisfaction after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the various effects that patient-specific factors, medical comorbidities, and demographics had on patient satisfaction. Two thousand and ninety-two patients underwent lower extremity total joint arthroplasty at our institution between 2014 and 2018. Nine hundred twenty-three of these patients responded to their HCAHPS survey (44%). Most patients (609, 66%) underwent primary total knee arthroplasty followed by 244 (26.4%) total hip arthroplasties, 35 (3.8%) revision total knee arthroplasties, 28 (3.0%) bilateral total knee arthroplasties, and 7 (0.8%) revision total hip arthroplasties. Increasing age and length of stay were associated with a decrease in patient satisfaction whereas patients who were married reported higher satisfaction. Patients discharged to a rehabilitation facility had a 12% decrease in top-box response rate compared to those discharged home. Contrary to our hypothesis, specific procedure type and the presence of comorbidities failed to predict patient satisfaction. The results of this study shed light on the intricate relationship between patient satisfaction and patient-specific factors. Furthermore, health care workers can counsel patients on expected satisfaction when considering total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Demographic Analysis of Pedicle Diameter, and Estimated Pedicle Screw Length of the Lumbar Spine in a Diverse Population.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature confirms the importance of understanding the variability in pedicle morphology among races. These studies suggest that more detailed and reliable measurements of pedicles should be undertaken. However, there is limited data on average pedicle diameters (PDs) or estimated pedicle screw lengths (EPSLs) between diverse racial populations. We sought to determine the differences in PD and EPSL in the lumbar spine between various races: "Asian," "Black," "White," and "Hispanic" to aid in perioperative planning during instrumented spinal fusion. METHODS: Axial cuts of 404 patients were inspected to obtain their transverse outer cortical PD as measured through the isthmus, and EPSL by measuring the posterior entry point at the longest distance, which perpendicularly transected the measured isthmic diameter, to the anterior vertebral cortex from L1 to L5. We examined the average PD and PD range at each level for each race. To determine the significance, we used a mixed analysis of variance and a post hoc analysis. RESULTS: In this retrospective chart review the races were found to be significantly different in PD and EPSL (P < .001). Post hoc analysis using Dunn-Bonferroni correction showed that Asians had significantly smaller PDs than Blacks and Whites (P < .002 and P < .014, respectively). The White and Hispanic population had significantly longer EPSLs when compared to Blacks and Asians from L1 to L5 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there are significant differences in pedicle morphology among races that must be taken into consideration when inserting pedicle screws during lumbar spinal fusion. Knowledge of these differences is of the utmost importance in order to limit complications while improving fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pedicle morphology is variable between races and understanding these differences is important for the safe placement of pedicle screws.

The Effect of Operating Room Size on Orthopaedic Surgical Site Infection Rates.

OBJECTIVE: With many preventable causes of surgical site infections (SSIs) identified, the effect of operating room (OR) size on SSI rates has not been assessed. This study investigated the effect of OR size on incidence of SSIs for orthopaedic procedures. BACKGROUND: SSIs remain a common complication within the perioperative realm. Responsible for increasing length of hospitalization and costs, SSIs result in a decreased quality of life for patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 11,163 patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery-including total knee and hip arthroplasties, laminectomies, and spinal fusions-between January 2018 and January 2020 were reviewed. Total net square footage (NSF) of all ORs was recorded, and incidence of SSIs was calculated. Cases were categorized based on the size of the OR (small: 250 to 399 NSF; medium: 400 to 549 NSF; and large: 550 to 699 NSF). Chi-square analysis compared infection rates between the different OR sizes, and a binary logistic regression model identified other predictors of infection. RESULTS: Overall, 137 patients (1.2%) developed an SSI. Of these infections, 16 (11.7%) occurred in small ORs, 83 (60.6%) in medium ORs, and 38 (27.7%) in large ORs. The incidence of SSIs was 0.7% in small ORs, 1.3% in medium ORs, and 1.8% in large ORs. Factors found to significantly impact SSI's included medium-sized ORs, younger patients, procedure type (fusions and emergencies/traumas), longer procedures, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (>3). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that OR size in addition to various other perioperative parameters plays a role in the rate of SSIs for orthopaedic procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study; Level III Evidence.

COVID-19 and Orthopaedics: Recovery After the Pandemic Surge.

The novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has placed an immense strain on health care systems and orthopedic surgeons across the world. To limit the spread, federal and state governments mandated the cancellation of all nonurgent surgical cases to address surging hospital admissions and manage workforce and resource reallocation. During the pandemic surge, thousands of surgical cancellations have been required. We outline our experience through the onset and advance of the surge, detail our incident response and discuss the transition toward recovery. Level of Evidence: Level V.

Predicting Elective Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgical Cancellations Based on Patient Demographics.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether patient demographics are associated with cancellation of elective orthopaedic sports medicine surgical procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 761 patients who were scheduled to undergo an elective sports medicine orthopaedic operation from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent the scheduled procedure (group A) and those in whom the operation was canceled for any reason prior to the surgical date and not rescheduled (group B). Univariate analysis assessed patient factors consisting of age, sex, race, language, marital status, occupation status, type of insurance (Medicaid or Medicare vs private), smoking history, employment status, and history of surgery to determine which demographic factors led to an increased risk of elective case cancellation. RESULTS: Patients who canceled were significantly older (46.5 years vs 41.5 years, t = 2.432, P = .015) than those who do not. In addition, current smokers (22.5% vs 10.9%, χ2 = 10.85, P = .001), patients with Medicare or Medicaid versus private insurance (16.7% vs 10.0%, χ2 = 5.35, P = .021), non-English-speaking patients (29.5% vs 11.6%, χ2 = 11.43, P = .001), and patients without a history of surgery requiring anesthesia (18.8% vs 9.6%, χ2 = 9.96, P = .002) were all more likely to cancel. When all studied variables were examined in a logistic regression analysis, of the above demographic variables, only insurance status was no longer significant, given its correlation with age and language. CONCLUSIONS: Increased age (≥46.5 years), non-English speaking, smoking, lack of a history of surgery requiring anesthesia, and Medicaid or Medicare insurance were found to contribute to an increased risk of elective orthopaedic surgery cancellation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Cost Analysis of Routine Examination of Pathology Specimens Following Ankle Arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Routine submission of pathologic specimens for histologic analysis following orthopedic surgery is a common and often required practice in the United States. Prior orthopedic studies have determined that these histologic examinations are of limited cost effectiveness and low clinical value because rarely do the pathology findings alter patient management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness and clinical significance of routine histologic examination of tissue specimens removed during ankle arthroscopy. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2018, 408 patients underwent ankle arthroscopy at a multi-center hospital system by 16 different orthopedic surgeons. The available pathology reports from these cases were retrospectively reviewed to determine if the routine histologic examination altered patient care. We compared the preoperative diagnosis to both the postoperative and histologic diagnoses. The total cost for these histologic examinations was estimated using 2017 Medicare physician fees released by the College of American Pathologists. Cost-effectiveness was estimated in 2017 US dollars by cost per discrepant and discordant diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 408 patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy, 361 pathology reports were available for review. The prevalence of concordant diagnosis was 98.9% (357/361); the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 1.0% (4/361). There were no cases identified with a discordant diagnosis. Total estimated cost for all pathology specimens was $46 381 in 2017 US dollars. Cost per discrepant diagnosis was $11 595. CONCLUSION: In our study, histologic examination of surgical specimens following ankle arthroscopy had no effect on patient management, yet it increased costs. Routine examination of these pathologic specimens had a low rate of discrepant and/or discordant diagnoses. Based on our results, routine pathologic examination of ankle arthroscopy tissue specimens should be sent solely at the discretion of the orthopedic surgeon as opposed to being a mandated policy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.