Antiparasitic Activity of Enterocin M and Durancin-like from Beneficial Enterococci in Mice Experimentally Infected with Trichinella spiralis.

Beneficial/probiotic strains protect the host from pathogens by competitive displacement and production of antibacterial substances, i.e., bacteriocins. The antiparasitic potential of bacteriocins/enterocins and their producing strains in experimental murine trichinellosis were tested as a new therapeutic strategy. Enterocin M and Durancin-like and their producers Enterococcus faecium CCM8558 and Enterococcus durans ED26E/7 were administered daily to mice that were challenged with Trichinella spiralis. Our study confirmed the antiparasitic effect of enterocins/enterococci, which reduced the number of adults in the intestine (Enterocin M-43.8%, E. faecium CCM8558-54.5%, Durancin-like-16.4%, E. durans ED26E/7-35.7%), suppressed the Trichinella reproductive capacity ex vivo (Enterocin M-61%, E. faecium CCM8558-74%, Durancin-like-38%, E. durans ED26E/7-66%), and reduced the number of muscle larvae (Enterocin M-39.6%, E. faecium CCM8558-55.7%, Durancin-like-15%, E. durans ED26E/7-36.3%). The direct effect of enterocins on Trichinella fecundity was documented by an in vitro test in which Durancin-like showed a comparable reducing effect to Enterocin M (40-60%) in contrast to the ex vivo test. The reducing activity of T.spiralis infection induced by Enterocin M was comparable to its strain E. faecium CCM8558; Durancin-like showed lower antiparasitic activity than its producer E. durans ED26E/7.

Variants of uncertain significance in the era of next-generation sequencing.

ABSTRACT: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now widely used in diagnosing rare diseases. However, it has some limitations, such as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). This can present difficulties even for nurse practitioners involved in clinical genetics. We present three cases from our clinical practice: two targeted panel testing and one exome sequencing. Whole blood samples were collected and sent for NGS analysis. In case 1, a VUS was found in the LITAF gene, which is associated with autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C. In case 2, a VUS was reported in the MEFV gene, which is associated with autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant familial Mediterranean fever. In these cases, the reported VUS corresponded to the clinical diagnosis. In case 3, two variants in the heterozygous state were found in the ATP7B gene, which is associated with Wilson disease, and the disorder was later clinically recognized. According to the published guidelines, VUSs should not be discussed as a cause for an observed genetic condition. Nevertheless, if the reported variant is in a gene associated with the clinically diagnosed disorder, and there is a strong genotype-phenotype correlation, it could be suggestive of the etiological role of this variant.