Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0242838, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33227029

ABSTRACT

With the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the question of society's capability to deal with an acute health crisis is, once again, brought to the forefront. In the core is the need to broaden the perspective on the determinants of a country's ability to cope with the spread of the virus. This paper is about bringing together diverse aspects of readiness and initial reaction to a COVID-19 outbreak. We proposed an integrated evaluation framework which encapsulates six dimensions of readiness and initial reaction. Using a specific multi-level outranking method, we analysed how these dimensions affect the relative positioning of European countries in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak. The results revealed that the order of countries based on our six-dimensional assessment framework is significantly reminiscent of the actual positioning of countries in terms of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in the initial phase of the pandemic. Our findings confirm that only when a country's readiness is complemented by an appropriate societal reaction we can expect a less severe outcome. Moreover, our study revealed different patterns of performance between former communist Eastern European and Western European countries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Global Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Government Regulation , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Isolation/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Isolation/methods , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/legislation & jurisprudence , Quarantine/methods , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...