Functional status among elderly Norwegian fallers living at home.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls and their after-effects are important contributors to disability in old age, but may be mitigated. The relationship between self-reported health and functioning and falling is examined in the present study. METHOD: The study design was cross-sectional. Data were collected from interviews with 431 community-dwelling Norwegian subjects aged 67-97 years. Physical health was assessed through items from the Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults (MFAQ), supplemented with the Body Mass Index (BMI). General health/psychosocial health was assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-20), the Mini-mental State Examination, two general health items and items concerning mental and social health from the MFAQ. Falls during the last six months were registered and scored 0 (no falls), 1 (one fall) or 2 (two or more falls). RESULTS: During the previous six months 24.1% of subjects reported falling. Four variables: 'Perceived difficulty in keeping balance in walking', 'Troubled by heart pounding/shortness of breath', sum score on the GHQ factor 'Depression/hopelessness', and a higher value on BMI, were independently associated with number of falls reported. CONCLUSIONS: Score value on 'Perceived difficulty in keeping balance in walking' was the strongest significant predictor of falls in the present study. In contrast with other studies, no association between anxiety, general health and falling was observed.

Falls reported among elderly Norwegians living at home.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Norway has the highest reported incidence of hip fractures in western Europe. Little is known about the epidemiology of falls in Norway where the winter season is long and dark. The objective of this work was to study reported falls and their consequences among elderly Norwegians living at home. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used for the study. Interviews were performed in the homes of 431 subjects, aged 67-97 years, living at home. Information on falling was gathered through six questions: whether the subject had fallen during the last six months, and if so, how many falls they had, where the last fall occurred, its perceived reason, the activity the subject had been engaged in when the fall occurred, and the resulting injury. RESULTS: In all, 24.1% of subjects reported falling during the last six months, and 9.5% had suffered more than one fall. Falls were most frequently linked to external events (63.1%). Outdoor falls were more frequent (59.0%; 95% CI = 51.2-82.0) than indoor falls. Older subjects were associated with more frequent indoor falls (p < 0.05), but gender was not significant. Fifty-one per cent of subjects had fallen while walking and 53% had suffered an injury from the last fall. In 13.4% of the women and 16.2% of the men, the last fall had resulted in a fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the results of other studies from industrialized Western countries, a similar crude fall rate, similar frequency and similar type of injury were found. However, in contrast to other studies, no gender difference was observed with regard to falling, place of falling and fracture rate.

Subjective well-being one year after stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the subjective well-being of stroke patients with that of a reference group, and to study its relationship to patient characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Interviews performed in the respondents' homes, tests performed at the outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS: Sixty patients one year after stroke (median age 74 years, interquartile range (IQR) 68-80), and 419 reference individuals (median age 75 years, IQR 71-80). MEASURES: Subjective well-being assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-20). Explanatory variables were demographic and medical characteristics of the individuals and scores on validated tests: Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients, Assessment of Cerebral Stroke and other Brain Damage, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the stroke patients than of the controls rated their subjective well-being as low, also after adjustment for age and gender (adjusted odds ratio 20.1, 95% confidence interval 9.6-42.0 by logistic regression). In bivariate analyses, leg and arm motor impairment, visuospatial impairment, apraxia, aphasia, low Barthel score, low FAI score, low MMSE score, and institutionalization were highly significant predictors of low subjective well-being (p-values < 0.01). In multiple linear regression, a model with gender (p = 0.3) and upper extremity motor score (p < 0.01) fitted the data well, and explained 48% of the variance in GHQ. CONCLUSION: Subjective well-being is decreased one year after stroke, and this is mainly attributed to arm motor impairments.