Mothers and fathers with intellectual and developmental disabilities who use US disability services: prevalence and living arrangements.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the prevalence of mothers and fathers with intellectual and developmental disabilities among US disability-service users. Child removal is a key issue for these parents. METHODS: We analysed 2018-19 National Core Indicators data from 35 states on US adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities being a parent. For parents of a child under 18, we examined whether the child lived with them. RESULTS: Prevalence of parenthood was 3.7% (6.0% women, 2.1% men). Among parents of a child under 18, 44.0% had their child living with them. Being a mother, being married and living with family were positively associated with child co-residence. Parents with co-resident children mainly lived in their own home (59.7%) or their family's home (32.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our prevalence estimate suggests a national total of 33 794 US parents who use intellectual and developmental disabilities services. For parents living with their child, a critical task for disability services is to enable parents and children to live in a family setting.

The relationship between antenatal provider type and maternal care in rural Ghana: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of antenatal provider type on maternity care in rural Ghana. METHODS: An analysis of maternal care by antenatal provider type using the 2008 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. Study population included rural Ghanaian women aged 15-49 years with report of a live birth between 2003 and 2008. Bivariate chi-square analysis was performed to examine differences in maternal report of WHO Maternal Health Interventions. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were performed to assess differences in antenatal care (ANC) scales and maternal care packages. RESULTS: Thousand and three hundred and sixty-seven rural women reported a live birth. Provider distribution was: doctor, 15.6%; midwife, 70%; community health officer (CHO), 9.1%; no provider, 5.3%. Women from lower socio-demographic categories were more likely to report midwife or CHO. Report of CHO vs. no provider was positively associated with maternal services (P < 0.01). Report of doctor or midwife vs. CHO was significantly associated with maternal services (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: There is a positive association between antenatal provider length of training and maternal specialization and report of maternal services. Community-based providers are associated with markedly increased report of maternal services compared with no provider. Structural factors appear to underlie some differences in service provision.