Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(5): e0407323, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567975

ABSTRACT

Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) were widely deployed to enhance SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with national guidance for low prevalence settings, positive Ag-RDTs were confirmed using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to avoid false positive results. However, increasing demands for positive Ag-RDT confirmation competed with other testing priorities in clinical laboratories. This work hypothesized that real-time RT-PCR without nucleic acid extraction (NAE) would be sufficiently sensitive to support positive Ag-RDT confirmation. Ag-RDT and NAAT results from community-based asymptomatic testing sites prior to the omicron variant wave were compared to calculate the weekly false positive rate (FPR) and false detection rate (FDR). Real-time RT-PCR was compared with and without NAE using 752 specimens previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using commercial NAATs and 344 specimens from Ag-RDT-positive individuals. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence on laboratory resources required to sustain Ag-RDT confirmation was modeled for the RT-PCR with and without NAE. Overall, FPR was low [0.07% (222/330,763)] in asymptomatic testing sites, but FDR was high [30.7% (222/724)]. When RT-PCR was compared with and without NAE, 100% concordance was obtained with NAAT-positive specimens, including those from Ag-RDT-positive individuals. NAE-free RT-PCR significantly reduced time to results, human resources, and overall costs. A 30.7% FDR reaffirms the need for NAAT-based confirmation of positive Ag-RDT results during low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. NAE-free RT-PCR was shown to be a simple and cost-sparing NAAT-based solution for positive Ag-RDT confirmation, and its implementation supported data-driven broader Ag-RDT deployment into communities, workplaces, and households. IMPORTANCE: Rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 was widely deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic. In settings of low prevalence, national guidance recommends that positive antigen test results be confirmed with molecular testing. Given the high testing burden on clinical laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic, the high volume of positive antigen tests submitted for confirmatory testing posed challenges for laboratory workflow. This study demonstrated that a simple PCR method without prior nucleic acid purification is an accurate and cost-effective solution for positive rapid antigen test confirmation. Implementing this method allowed molecular confirmatory testing for positive antigen tests to be sustained as antigen testing was expanded into large populations such as workplaces, schools, and households.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Prevalence , False Positive Reactions , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
2.
Microbiol Spectr ; 11(6): e0076123, 2023 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815347

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Molecular tests like polymerase chain reaction were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic but as the pandemic evolved, so did SARS-CoV-2. This virus acquired mutations, prompting concerns that mutations could compromise molecular test results and be falsely negative. While some manufacturers may have in-house programs for monitoring mutations that could impact their assay performance, it is important to promptly report mutations in circulating viral strains that could adversely impact a diagnostic test result. However, commercial test target sites are proprietary, making independent monitoring difficult. In this study, SARS-CoV-2 test target sites were sequenced to monitor and assess mutations impact, and 29 novel mutations impacting SARS-CoV-2 detection were identified. This framework for molecular test target site quality assurance could be adapted to any molecular test, ensuring accurate diagnostic test results and disease diagnoses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Pandemics , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
3.
J Clin Virol ; 159: 105356, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mpox (formerly monkeypox) is an emerging zoonotic disease of public health concern that presents as a rash mimicking other common viral exanthems. Unlike traditional testing algorithms relying on several assays, the BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel simultaneously detects common viruses causing rashes; however, Biofire ME is only licensed for testing on cerebral spinal fluid. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated use of the Biofire ME panel for detection and discrimination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), human herpesviruses type 6 (HHV-6), enteroviruses (EVs), and human paraechoviruses (HPeVs) from a dermal or mucocutaneous swabs collected in universal transport media (UTM). STUDY DESIGN: Results of the BioFire ME panel were compared against methods used during clinical testing. Ten-fold serial dilutions in UTM of cultured viruses were used to compare analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity was assessed using panels of microorganisms in UTM. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were assessed using 20 positive specimens each for HHV-1, HHV-2, HHV-6, VZV, EVs, and HPeV, as well as 35 known negative specimens that included 15 mpox-positive specimens. RESULTS: Biofire ME was as sensitive as comparator methods, and correctly discriminated all HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, HHV-6, EVs, and HPeVs from mpox and mpox-mimickers. Cross-reaction between EV and rhinoviruses A, B, and C were noted in the specificity panel. CONCLUSIONS: Swabs in UTM collected for mpox testing are suitable for use on the Biofire ME panel, allowing more streamlined diagnostic testing for viral exanthems in patients under investigation for mpox infection.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis , Herpesvirus 1, Human , Herpesvirus 6, Human , Meningitis , Mpox (monkeypox) , Virus Diseases , Viruses , Humans , Encephalitis/etiology , Herpesvirus 2, Human , Herpesvirus 3, Human , Virus Diseases/diagnosis
4.
J Med Microbiol ; 71(6)2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35671206

ABSTRACT

The world has experienced several waves of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs) throughout the COVID-19 pandemic since the first cases in December 2019. The Omicron VoC has increased transmission, compared to its predecessors, and can present with sore throat and other cold-like symptoms. Given the predominance of throat symptoms, and previous work demonstrating better sensitivity using antigen-based rapid detection tests when a throat swab is included in the standard nasal sampling, this quality improvement project sought to ensure ongoing suitability of both combined oropharyngeal/nares (OPN) and nasopharyngeal (NP) swab sampling used throughout the pandemic. Consenting participants meeting Public Health testing criteria (mostly symptomatic or a close contact of a known case) were enrolled, and paired NP and OPN swabs were subjected to nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). Comparing paired specimens from 392 participants sensitivity of NP swabs was 89.1 % (95 % CI, 78.8-94.9), and that of OPN was 98.4 % (95 % CI: 90.9->99.9) (P-value 0.052). This project demonstrated that both NP and combined OPN swabs detected the Omicron variant with similar sensitivity by NAAT, supporting the continued use of either swab collection for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Nasopharynx , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling
5.
J Virol Methods ; 295: 114184, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34029634

ABSTRACT

With increasing demands for SARS-CoV-2 testing, as well as the shortages for testing supplies, collection devices, and trained healthcare workers (HCWs) to collect specimens, self-collection is an attractive prospect to reduce the need for HCWs and expenditure of personal protective equipment. Apart from the traditional nasopharyngeal swab used for SARS-CoV-2 detection, alternative specimens have been validated such as a combined swabs of the oropharynx and anterior nares (OP/N), or throat samples using saline gargles. Both the alternative specimen types are amenable to self-collection. Objectives. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity of HCW-collected (OP/N) swabs, self-collected OP/N swabs, and self-collected saline gargles. Among 38 individuals previously testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (or their close contacts), two self-collected specimen types (OP/N and saline gargles) were compared to HCW-collected OP/N swabs. SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed on three molecular assays: a laboratory-developed test (LDT), and two commercial assays on automated platforms: Cobas 6800 (Roche Diagnostics) and Panther (Hologic). The sensitivity of self-collected OP/N swabs was equivalent to healthcare worker (HCW)-collected OP/N swabs at 100.0 % [92.6%-100.0%] for all three molecular tests. The sensitivity of saline gargles was not significantly different than HCW-collected OP/N swabs, but varied slightly between instruments at 93.8 % [85.9%-93.8%] for the LDT, 96.8 % [88.6%-96.8%] for the Cobas assay, and 96.7 % [89.2%-96.9%] for the Panther assay. Overall, self-collection using OP/N swabs or saline gargles are reasonable alternatives to HCW-based collections for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and could facilitate broader surveillance strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Health Personnel , Humans , Nasal Cavity/virology , Oropharynx/virology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Saliva/virology , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
J Clin Virol ; 128: 104442, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32540034

ABSTRACT

Given the global shortage of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs typically used for respiratory virus detection, alternative collection methods were evaluated during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study showed that a combined oropharyngeal/nares swab is a suitable alternative to NP swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, with sensitivities of 91.7% and 94.4%, respectively.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Nasal Cavity/virology , Oropharynx/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
J Virol Methods ; 239: 58-60, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27838260

ABSTRACT

Rapid and accurate detection of measles virus is important for case diagnosis and public health management. This study compared the performance of two monoplex RT-PCR reactions targeting the H and N genes to a duplex RT-PCR targeting both genes simultaneously. The duplex simplified processing without compromising assay performance characteristic.


Subject(s)
Measles virus/isolation & purification , Measles/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Canada/epidemiology , DNA Primers , Hemagglutinins, Viral/genetics , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/virology , Measles virus/genetics , Neuraminidase/genetics , Public Health , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 2016: 1280247, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27366155

ABSTRACT

Background. Norovirus is the leading cause of viral gastroenteritis, with GII.4 being the most common circulating genotype. Recently, outbreaks in China revealed that norovirus GII.17 GII.P17 had become predominant. Objective. This study aimed to characterize the distribution of norovirus genotypes circulating in Nova Scotia. Methods. Stool specimens were collected from gastrointestinal outbreaks in Nova Scotia between Jan 2014 and June 2015 and subjected to real-time RT-PCR. Norovirus-positive specimens were referred to the National Microbiology Laboratory for sequence-based genotyping. Results. The first norovirus GII.P17-GII.17 outbreak in Canada was identified, but no widespread activity was observed in Nova Scotia. Discussion. It is unknown whether GII.P17-GII.17 is more widespread in Canada since contributions to Canadian surveillance are too sparse to effectively monitor the epidemiology of emerging norovirus genotypes. Conclusions. Presence of norovirus GII.17:P17 in Canada highlights the need for more systematic surveillance to ensure that molecular targets used for laboratory detection are effective and help understand norovirus evolution, epidemiology, and pathogenesis.

9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(11): 1344-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26177956

ABSTRACT

To determine the optimal number of specimens for virus detection in a respiratory outbreak, laboratory results from 2 Canadian public health laboratories were reviewed. The evidence suggests that 3 specimens are sufficient for detection of a virus in >95% of outbreaks, thereby reducing laboratory costs.


Subject(s)
Laboratories/standards , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Specimen Handling/standards , Canada , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Public Health
10.
Virol J ; 11: 129, 2014 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25037234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although national surveillance programs are in place to monitor norovirus epidemiology, the emergence of new strains and the genetic diversity among genotypes can be challenging for clinical laboratories. This study evaluated the analytical and clinical performance characteristics of one real-time RT-PCR and two end-point RT-PCRs commonly used in microbiology laboratories. METHODS: Lower limit of detection (LoD) was determined using 10-fold dilutions of noroviruses belonging to different genotypes. The clinical performance of the real-time and end-point RT-PCRs was assessed in parallel using nucleic acids extracted from 186 stool specimens. RESULTS: The real-time RT-PCR was highly sensitive and specific for the detection of norovirus genotypes that are currently circulating in Canada. In contrast, the two end-point RT-PCRs displayed poor analytical sensitivity or complete failure to detect certain norovirus genotypes, which was correlated to sequence mismatches in the primer-binding sites. In an attempt to improve norovirus detection with the end-point RT-PCRs, both assays were processed concurrently and detection from either assay was considered a positive result. Concurrent testing resulted in only a modest increase in clinical sensitivity (75.0%) compared to each assay alone (62.5% and 71.9%). However, the false positivity rate increased from 1.98% and 3.36% for the assays alone to 5.47% with concurrent testing. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the benefits of a real-time method and provides support for routine surveillance to monitor norovirus epidemiology and ongoing proficiency testing to ensure detection of circulating norovirus genotypes.


Subject(s)
Caliciviridae Infections/diagnosis , Caliciviridae Infections/virology , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Gastroenteritis/virology , Genotype , Norovirus/genetics , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(12): 4049-51, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18945836

ABSTRACT

A real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assay that targeted both the mumps virus F gene and human RNase P in clinical samples was adapted for use with the LightCycler platform. LightCycler RT-PCR is as sensitive as conventional nested RT-PCR and significantly less expensive and labor-intensive, making it ideal for mumps diagnosis during outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Mumps virus/isolation & purification , Mumps/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Humans , Mumps/virology , Mumps virus/genetics , RNA, Viral/genetics , Ribonuclease P/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viral Fusion Proteins/genetics
12.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(8): 2786-9, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18524967

ABSTRACT

Real-time PCR is a powerful tool for the detection and typing of herpes simplex virus (HSV). HSV types 1 and 2 can be distinguished by using the differences in the melting temperatures (T(m)s) of the hybridization probes. The efficacy of T(m) profiling with low DNA concentrations was evaluated in this study.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/chemistry , DNA, Viral/genetics , Herpesvirus 2, Human/genetics , Transition Temperature , Cerebrospinal Fluid/virology , Female , Herpesvirus 2, Human/classification , Herpesvirus 2, Human/isolation & purification , Humans , Lip/virology , Male , Penis/virology , Tongue/virology , Vulva/virology
13.
J Virol Methods ; 151(1): 158-60, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18468698

ABSTRACT

Prior to PCR amplification, uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) can be incorporated to prevent amplicon contamination. Melting temperature (T(m)) analysis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) hybridization probes was used to demonstrate a concentration-dependent decrease in T(m) values when heat stabile or heat labile UNG was added.


Subject(s)
DNA Probes , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Herpesvirus 2, Human/genetics , Nucleic Acid Hybridization/methods , Transition Temperature , Uracil-DNA Glycosidase/metabolism , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/metabolism , Enzyme Stability , Herpes Simplex/virology , Herpesvirus 1, Human/isolation & purification , Herpesvirus 2, Human/isolation & purification , Hot Temperature , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
14.
CMAJ ; 175(5): 483-8, 2006 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16940266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Before the widespread use of vaccine, mumps was the most common cause of viral meningitis (up to 10% of mumps infections). Vaccination programs have resulted in a drop of more than 99% in the number of reported mumps cases in the United States and Canada. Although rare in Canada, outbreaks have recently occurred throughout the world, including a large outbreak in the United Kingdom, where more than 56,000 cases were reported in 2004-2005. METHODS: Two recent outbreaks in Nova Scotia were investigated by public health officials. Cases were defined by laboratory confirmation of infection (i.e., isolation of mumps virus by culture) or clinical diagnosis in people epidemiologically linked to a laboratory-confirmed case. The people infected were interviewed to determine possible links and to identify contacts. Mumps virus was cultured from urine and throat specimens, identified via reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and subjected to phylogenetic analysis to identify the origin of the strain. RESULTS: The first outbreak involved 13 high-school students (median age 14 yr): 9 who had previously received 2 doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) and 4 who received a single dose. The second outbreak comprised 19 cases of mumps among students and some staff at a local university (median age 23 yr), of whom 18 had received only 1 dose of MMR (the other received a second dose). The viruses identified in the outbreaks were phylogenetically similar and belonged to a genotype commonly reported in the UK. The virus from the second outbreak is identical to the strain currently circulating in the UK and United States. INTERPRETATION: The predominance in these outbreaks of infected people of university age not only highlights an environment with potential for increased transmission but also raises questions about the efficacy of the MMR vaccine. The people affected may represent a "lost cohort" who do not have immunity from natural mumps infection and were not offered a 2-dose schedule. Given the current level of mumps activity around the world, clinicians should remain vigilant for symptoms of mumps.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , DNA, Viral/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mumps/transmission , Mumps virus/classification , Mumps virus/genetics , Nova Scotia/epidemiology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Students , Universities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...