Relationship between hepatic/visceral fat and hepatic insulin resistance in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Abdominal fat accumulation (visceral/hepatic) has been associated with hepatic insulin resistance (IR) in obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We examined the relationship between visceral/hepatic fat accumulation and hepatic IR/accelerated gluconeogenesis (GNG). METHODS: In 14 normal glucose tolerant (NGT) (body mass index [BMI] = 25 +/- 1 kg/m(2)) and 43 T2DM (24 nonobese, BMI = 26 +/- 1; 19 obese, BMI = 32 +/- 1 kg/m(2)) subjects, we measured endogenous (hepatic) glucose production (3-(3)H-glucose) and GNG ((2)H(2)O) in the basal state and during 240 pmol/m(2)/min euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, and liver (LF) subcutaneous (SAT)/visceral (VAT) fat content by magnetic resonance spectroscopy/magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: LF was increased in lean T2DM compared with lean NGT (18% +/- 3% vs 9% +/- 2%, P < .03), but was similar in lean T2DM and obese T2DM (18% +/- 3% vs 22% +/- 3%; P = NS). Both VAT and SAT increased progressively from lean NGT to lean T2DM to obese T2DM. T2DM had increased basal endogenous glucose production (EGP) (NGT, 15.1 +/- 0.5; lean T2DM, 16.3 +/- 0.4; obese T2DM, 17.2 +/- 0.6 micromol/min/kg(ffm); P = .02) and basal GNG flux (NGT, 8.6 +/- 0.4; lean T2DM, 9.6 +/- 0.4; obese T2DM, 11.1 +/- 0.6 micromol/min/kg(ffm); P = .02). Basal hepatic IR index (EGP x fasting plasma insulin) was increased in T2DM (NGT, 816 +/- 54; lean T2DM, 1252 +/- 164; obese T2DM, 1810 +/- 210; P = .007). In T2DM, after accounting for age, sex, and BMI, both LF and VAT, but not SAT, were correlated significantly (P < .05) with basal hepatic IR and residual EGP during insulin clamp. Basal percentage of GNG and GNG flux were correlated positively with VAT (P < .05), but not with LF. LF, but not VAT, was correlated with fasting insulin, insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, and impaired FFA suppression by insulin (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal adiposity significantly affects both lipid (FFA) and glucose metabolism. Excess VAT primarily increases GNG flux. Both VAT and LF are associated with hepatic IR.

The effect of pioglitazone on the liver: role of adiponectin.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic hyperglycemia results from insulin resistance of peripheral tissues and glucose overproduction due to increased gluconeogenesis (GNG). Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) improve peripheral insulin sensitivity, but the effect on the liver is less clear. The goal of this study was to examine the effect of TZDs on GNG. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetic subjects were randomly assigned (double-blind study) to receive pioglitazone (PIO group; 45 mg/day) or placebo (Plc group) for 4 months to assess endogenous glucose production (EGP) (3-(3)H-glucose infusion), GNG (D2O technique), and insulin sensitivity by two-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (240 and 960 pmol/min per m2). RESULTS: Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (10.0 +/- 0.8 to 7.7 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) and HbA1c (9.0 +/- 0.4 to 7.3 +/- 0.6%) decreased in the PIO and increased in Plc group (P < 0.05 PIO vs. Plc). Insulin sensitivity increased approximately 40% during high insulin clamp after pioglitazone (P < 0.01) and remained unchanged in the Plc group (P < 0.05 PIO vs. Plc). EGP did not change, while GNG decreased in the PIO group (9.6 +/- 0.7 to 8.7 +/- 0.6 micromol x min(-1) x kg(ffm)(-1)) and increased in the Plc group (8.0 +/- 0.5 to 9.6 +/- 0.8) (P < 0.05 PIO vs. Plc). Change in FPG correlated with change in GNG flux (r = 0.63, P < 0.003) and in insulin sensitivity (r = 0.59, P < 0.01). Plasma adiponectin increased after pioglitazone (P < 0.001) and correlated with delta FPG (r = -0.54, P < 0.03), delta GNG flux (r = -0.47, P < 0.05), and delta insulin sensitivity (r = 0.65, P < 0.005). Plasma free fatty acids decreased after pioglitazone and correlated with delta GNG flux (r = 0.54, P < 0.02). From stepwise regression analysis, the strongest determinant of change in FPG was change in GNG flux. CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone improves FPG, primarily by reducing GNG flux in type 2 diabetic subjects.

The effect of rosiglitazone on the liver: decreased gluconeogenesis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetic hyperglycemia results from insulin resistance of peripheral tissues and glucose overproduction due to increased gluconeogenesis (GNG). Thiazolidinediones have been shown to improve glycemic control and increase peripheral insulin sensitivity. Whether chronic thiazolidinedione treatment is associated with a decrease in GNG has not been determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 26 diet-treated type 2 diabetic patients randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (RSG; 8 mg/d; n = 13) or placebo (n = 13) for 12 wk. At baseline and 12 wk, we measured endogenous glucose production (by [3H]glucose infusion) and GNG (by the [2H]2O technique) after a 15-h fast. Peripheral insulin sensitivity was evaluated by a two-step (240 and 960 pmol/min/m(-2)) euglycemic insulin clamp. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, RSG reduced fasting plasma glucose (9.7 +/- 0.7 to 7.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter; P < 0.001), fasting fractional GNG (-15 +/- 4%; P = 0.002), and fasting GNG flux (-3.9 +/- 1.2 micromol/min/kg fat-free mass; P = 0.004), with no effect on glycogenolytic flux. Changes in GNG flux and fasting glucose were tightly correlated (r = 0.83; P < 0.0001). During both clamp steps, RSG enhanced insulin-mediated glucose clearance (by 26% and 31%; P = 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). In a subgroup of patients studied with magnetic resonance imaging, the reduction in GNG flux was correlated (r = 0.65; P < 0.02) with the reduction in visceral fat area. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: RSG increases peripheral tissue insulin sensitivity and decreases endogenous glucose release via an inhibition of gluconeogenesis.

Separate contribution of diabetes, total fat mass, and fat topography to glucose production, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis.

The contribution of increased gluconeogenesis (GNG) to the excessive rate of endogenous glucose production (EGP) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is well established. However, the separate effects of obesity (total body fat), visceral adiposity, and T2DM have not been investigated. We measured GNG (by the (2)H(2)O technique) and EGP (with 3-(3)H-glucose) after an overnight fast in 44 type 2 diabetic and 29 gender/ethnic-matched controls. Subjects were classified as obese (body mass index 30 kg/m(2) or greater) or nonobese (body mass index < 30 kg/m(2)); diabetic subjects were further subdivided according to the severity of fasting hyperglycemia [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 9 mm or >or= 9 mm]. EGP was similar in nondiabetic controls and T2DM with FPG less than 9 mm but was increased in T2DM with FPG >or= 9 mm (P < 0.001). Within the diabetic groups, obesity had an independent effect to further increase basal EGP (P < 0.01). In both nonobese diabetic groups, both the percent GNG and gluconeogenic flux were increased, compared with nonobese nondiabetic controls. In both diabetic groups, obesity further increased both percent GNG and gluconeogenic flux. In obese and nonobese T2DM, the increase in gluconeogenic flux was not accompanied by a reciprocal decrease in glycogenolysis, indicating a loss of hepatic autoregulation. By multivariate analysis, gluconeogenic flux was positively correlated with percent body fat, visceral fat, and the fasting plasma free fatty acid and glucose concentrations (all P

Influence of ethnicity and familial diabetes on glucose tolerance and insulin action: a physiological analysis.

Both ethnicity and familial diabetes (FHD) confer risk for type 2 diabetes [diabetes mellitus (DM)], but their relative influence has not been established. To analyze the separate impact of ethnicity, Mexican-American vs. Caucasian, and FHD on the physiological determinants of glucose tolerance, we measured insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake (IS(GU)) (by the clamp technique), endogenous glucose production (by 3-[(3)H]glucose infusion), and insulin secretory response (to oral glucose) in 172 Mexican-Americans and 60 Caucasians with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or DM. IS(GU) was markedly reduced in diabetics vs. NGT (3.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 8.4 +/- 0.5 ml.min(-1).kg(ffm)(-1), P < 0.0001), and lower in Mexican-Americans than in Caucasians (5.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.3 +/- 0.7 ml.min(-1).kg(ffm)(-1), P < 0.003; ffm, fat-free mass). In a multivariate analysis including both ethnicity and FHD (and adjusting for body mass index, age, and diabetes), ethnicity was still a significant (P = 0.02) independent correlate of IS(GU). Insulin resistance of glucose production was increased in diabetics (14 +/- 1 mmol.min(-1).[ micro U/ml], P < 0.0001 vs. 9 +/- 1 of NGT), whereas the 30' insulin/glucose ratio was decreased (16 +/- 1 micro U/mg, P < 0.0001 vs. 60 +/- 5). In multivariate models, neither ethnicity nor FHD were significant independent correlates of glucose production and early insulin response. We conclude that the primary physiological target of the propensity to diabetes of Mexican-Americans is insulin resistance of glucose uptake.

Metabolic effects of visceral fat accumulation in type 2 diabetes.

Visceral fat (VF) excess has been associated with decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity and has been suggested to contribute to hepatic insulin resistance. However, the mechanisms by which VF impacts on hepatic glucose metabolism and the quantitative role of VF in glycemic control have not been investigated. In the present study 63 type 2 diabetic subjects (age, 55 +/- 1 yr; fasting plasma glucose, 5.5-14.4 mmol/liter; hemoglobin A(1c), 6.1-11.7%) underwent measurement of 1) fat-free mass ((3)H(2)O technique), 2) sc and visceral abdominal fat area (magnetic resonance imaging), 3) insulin sensitivity (euglycemic insulin clamp), 4) endogenous glucose output ([(3)H]glucose infusion technique), and 5) gluconeogenesis ((2)H(2)O method). After adjustment for sex, age, body mass index, diabetes duration, ethnicity, and sc fat area, VF area was positively related to fasting hyperglycemia (partial r = 0.46; P = 0.001) as well as to hemoglobin A(1c) (partial r = 0.50; P = 0.0003). Insulin sensitivity was reciprocally related to VF independently of body mass index (partial r = 0.33; P = 0.01). In contrast, the relation of basal endogenous glucose output to VF was not statistically significant. This lack of association was explained by the fact that VF was positively associated with gluconeogenesis flux (confounder-adjusted, partial r = 0.45; P = 0.003), but was reciprocally associated with glycogenolysis (partial r = 0.31; P < 0.05). We conclude that in patients with established type 2 diabetes, VF accumulation has a significant negative impact on glycemic control through a decrease in peripheral insulin sensitivity and an enhancement of gluconeogenesis.