Factors associated with switching and combination use of antidepressants in young Swedish adults.

AIMS: Little is known on factors associated with switching and combination use of antidepressants. Our aim was to describe such use and to analyse the association with socioeconomic factors and level of care in Swedish adults aged 20-34 years. METHODS: Individuals, aged 20-34 years, who purchased an antidepressant in January-June 2006, and who had not purchased any antidepressant in the preceding 6 months (n = 24,897) were followed from 6 up to 12 months. Among those who purchased ≥ 2 antidepressant substances, switchers were defined as those who did not fulfil the requirements for combination use. Data on purchased antidepressants and socioeconomic characteristics were obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and Statistics Sweden. The association between (i) ≥ 2 antidepressants or (ii) switching, respectively, and socioeconomic factors as well as level of care was analysed with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 4254 individuals (17%) purchased ≥ 2 antidepressant substances, and the remaining 20,643 (83%) purchased one antidepressant. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for purchase of ≥ 2 antidepressants (vs. purchase of one antidepressant only) was higher among those who started on mirtazapine compared with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors: 2.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.93-2.57), and lower in individuals with high education: 0.64 (0.54-0.75), and shorter length of follow-up: 0.73 (0.62-0.85). Among those with ≥ 2 antidepressants, 71.6% were classified as switchers. The adjusted OR for switching (vs. combination use) were higher among divorced/widows/widowers: 1.61 (1.05-2.49), and lower among individuals with short university education: 0.58 (0.43-0.78), those starting on mirtazapine: 0.78 (0.62-0.97), and when treatment was initiated in psychiatric care: 0.75 (0.63-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: One of six new users purchased at least two antidepressants, the majority were classified as switchers. Purchase patterns were associated with socioeconomic characteristics, in particular level of education, type of first purchased antidepressant, and level of care initiating treatment.

Pharmacogenomics of CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and MDR1 in Vietnam.

AIM: The aim of this study was to obtain pharmacogenetic data in a Vietnamese population on genes coding for proteins involved in the elimination of drugs currently used for the treatment of malaria and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. METHOD: The main polymorphisms on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and the multi-drug resistance 1 gene (MDR1) were genotyped in 78 healthy Vietnamese subjects. Pharmacokinetic metrics were available for CYP2A6 (coumarin), CYP2C19 (mephenytoin), CYP2D6 (metoprolol) and CYP3As (midazolam), allowing correlations with the determined genotype. RESULTS: In the CYP2 family, we detected alleles CYP2A6*4 (12%) and *5 (15%); CYP2B6*4 (8%), *6 (27%); CYP2C19*2 (31%) and *3 (6%); CYP2D6*4, *5, *10 (1, 8 and 44%, respectively). In the CYP3A family, CYP3A4*1B was detected at a low frequency (2%), whereas CYP3A5 *3 was detected at a frequency of 67%. The MDR1 3435T allele was present with a prevalence of 40%. Allele proportions in our cohort were compared with those reported for other Asian populations. CYP2C19 genotypes were associated to the S-4'-OH-mephenytoin/S-mephenytoin ratio quantified in plasma 4 h after intake of 100 mg mephenytoin. While CYP2D6 genotypes were partially reflected by the alpha-OH-metroprolol/metoprolol ratio in plasma 4 h after dosing, no correlation existed between midazolam plasma concentrations 4 h post-dose and CYP3A genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The Vietnamese subjects of our study cohort presented allele prevalences in drug-metabolising enzymes that were generally comparable with those reported in other Asian populations. Deviations were found for CYP2A6*4 compared to a Chinese population (12 vs. 5%, respectively; P = 0.023), CYP2A6*5 compared with a Korean population (15 vs. <1%, respectively; P < 0.0001), a Malaysian population (1%; P < 0.0001) and a Chinese population (1%; P < 0.0001); CYP2B6*6 compared with a Korean population (27 vs. 12%; P = 0.002) and a Japanese population (16%; P = 0.021). Pharmacokinetic metrics versus genotype analysis reinforces the view that the predictive value of certain globally common variants (e.g. CYP2D6 single nucleotide polymorphisms) should be evaluated in a population-specific manner.

Antimalarial resistance and DHFR/DHPS genotypes of Plasmodium falciparum three years after introduction of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine in rural Tanzania.

We assessed the efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ) and DHFR/DHPS genotypes of Plasmodium falciparum in rural Tanzania, 3 years after their introduction as first- and second-line treatments for uncomplicated malaria, respectively. Under five children with uncomplicated malaria were given standard treatments of either SP (n=66) or AQ (n=30) and treatment outcomes after 14 and 28 days were determined. Total treatment failure of 18 and 42.5% was observed for SP on days 14 and 28, respectively. For AQ, total treatment failure of 27 and 53% was found on day 14 and 28, respectively. On day 14, significantly lower SP total treatment failures were observed in 2004 compared with results from a study conducted in 1999 in the same location. No relationship was detected between clinical outcome and DHFR/DHPS genotypes, but the point mutation prevalence in parasites was higher than in 1999. Pre-treatment blood levels of SP were detected in a quarter of the study children: less than expected. We report unacceptably high levels of total treatment failures, both for first- and second-line treatments for uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania 3 years after their introduction, supporting the decision to replace them with artemisinin-based combination therapy.