Diagnosing pneumonia by physical examination: relevant or relic?

BACKGROUND: The reliability of chest physical examination and the degree of agreement among examiners in diagnosing pneumonia based on these findings are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of various physical examination maneuvers in diagnosing pneumonia and to compare the interobserver reliability of the maneuvers among 3 examiners. METHODS: Fifty-two male patients presenting to the emergency department of a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (cough and change in sputum) were prospectively examined. A comprehensive lung physical examination was performed sequentially by 3 physicians who were blind to clinical history, laboratory findings, and x-ray results. Examination findings by lung site and whether the examiner diagnosed pneumonia were recorded on a standard form. Chest x-ray films were read by a radiologist. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had pneumonia confirmed by chest x-ray films. Twenty-eight patients did not have pneumonia. Abnormal lung sounds were common in both groups; the most frequently detected were rales in the upright seated position and bronchial breath sounds. Relatively high agreement among examiners (kappa approximately 0.5) occurred for rales in the lateral decubitus position and for wheezes. The 3 examiners' clinical diagnosis of pneumonia had a sensitivity of 47% to 69% and specificity of 58% to 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of interobserver agreement was highly variable for different physical examination findings. The most valuable examination maneuvers in detecting pneumonia were unilateral rales and rales in the lateral decubitus position. The traditional chest physical examination is not sufficiently accurate on its own to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of pneumonia.

A prospective study of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and intravenous therapy-related phlebitis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) therapy-associated phlebitis is common, but its causes are ill defined. Some cases may be related to bacterial colonization of the skin surrounding the IV catheter, especially by Staphylococcus aureus. This prospective study examined the association of phlebitis with anterior nares S aureus carriage, as well as with other potential risk factors. METHODS: Selected demographic and clinical data and a nares culture were collected from patients on designated wards by us and from the IV therapy team at the time of initial IV catheter placement. Patients were followed up for signs and symptoms of phlebitis for the duration of the initial catheter's use and for up to two additional IV placements. Potential risk factors were compared for patients who developed phlebitis and those who did not by the Cox multivariate proportional hazards model. RESULTS: During 10 weeks, 273 men with a total of 416 catheter placements had fully evaluable data. Phlebitis occurred during 13.7% of the catheter placements. Nasal cultures yielded S aureus from 14.3% of the patients, but none of the IV team nurses. Surprisingly, S aureus nasal colonization was related (at borderline statistical significance) to a reduction in phlebitis risk. Location of the patient on a surgical ward, the presence of infection at any site, and a larger-gauge catheter were each significant independent risk factors for phlebitis. The highest risk of phlebitis appeared to have been within 12 to 24 hours of catheter placement. CONCLUSIONS: The primary finding of this study was that nasal colonization with S aureus did not increase the risk of developing IV catheter-associated phlebitis. Our rate of IV catheter-associated phlebitis was similar to that in other studies, but the factors predisposing to phlebitis differed somewhat from those in previous studies.

Immediate and long-term efficacy of systemic antibiotics for eradicating nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus.

The efficacy of nine antibiotics used in different nonrandomized regimens for eradicating nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus was investigated in 72 patients. Dicloxacillin, erythromycin and three cephalosporins had eradicated colonization in about 75% of cases at early follow-up (less than or equal to 20 days) and in less than or equal to 50% at late follow-up (greater than or equal to 20 days). Clindamycin had eradicated colonization in all 13 patients at both follow-up times. One of two patients was successfully treated with fleroxacin, as were three of five with enoxacin. Among 21 patients treated with ofloxacin, colonization was eradicated in 20 (95%) at early follow-up and in all six of those from whom late follow-up cultures were obtained. Thus, clindamycin and ofloxacin appear to be useful systemic antibiotics for eradicating nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus.

Treatment of lower respiratory infections in outpatients with ofloxacin compared with erythromycin.

To assess the safety and efficacy of a ten-day oral course of ofloxacin (400 mg 12 hourly) as compared with erythromycin (400 mg every 6 hours) for treatment of lower respiratory tract infections, fifty-two adult outpatients with pulmonary infiltrates (pneumonia) or with a cough and purulent sputum (bronchitis) were evaluated. Expectorated sputum specimens were Gram-stained and cultured, and antibody titres to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophilia, and in most cases Chlamydia pneumoniae were measured on acute and convalescent serum samples. Patients were evaluated clinically, microbiologically and radiographically three to five days after concluding therapy; the incidence of adverse reactions was monitored throughout the study period. The ofloxacin group (N = 25) was comprised of nineteen patients with pneumonia and six patients with bronchitis. The erythromycin group (N = 27) was comprised of thirteen patients with pneumonia and fourteen patients with bronchitis. All fifty-two patients were either clinically improved or cured after therapy. Microbiological cure was documented in all fourteen cases (27%) in which causative pathogens were identified. Clinical cure was achieved with ofloxacin in 68% of patients with pneumonia and in 83% of patients with bronchitis, while clinical cure with erythromycin was achieved in 46% of patients with pneumonia and 54% of patients with bronchitis. Adverse reactions (mostly mild gastrointestinal or central nervous system symptoms) were reported by eight patients receiving ofloxacin and four patients receiving erythromycin. While the types of adverse effects were similar, ofloxacin showed a trend toward a higher rate of cure than erythromycin. Ofloxacin is a promising new antibiotic for the treatment of acute lower respiratory infections.