Salvage of an Octogenarian Liver Graft Using Normothermic Perfusion: A Case Report.

Liver transplantation with very old donors is safe, but is associated with an increased incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions and delayed graft function. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is a novel technique for preservation of liver grafts and has the potential to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. A case is reported here of a liver transplantation (LT) with a graft from an 83-year-old brain-dead donor. Procurement was with dual perfusion and en bloc, modified fast technique. Donor kidneys were not transplanted due to severe atherosclerosis and poor perfusion. The liver was shipped to the transplantation center and underwent NMP with a blood-based perfusate. During machine perfusion lactates decreased, vascular flow was stable, and bile production restored, and the graft was considered suitable for transplantation. The postoperative course was uneventful and 4 months after surgery the patient is in good clinical condition with normal liver function. To date, few LTs have been performed with NMP in humans, but its preliminary results are promising. NMP allows functional evaluation of the graft and possibly reduction of post-transplantation complications when extended-criteria donor grafts are used.

Use of octogenarian donors for liver transplantation: a survival analysis.

Use of very old donors in liver transplantation (LT) is controversial because advanced donor age is associated with a higher risk for graft dysfunction and worse long-term results, especially for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive recipients. This was a retrospective, single-center review of primary, ABO-compatible LT performed between 2001 and 2010. Recipients were stratified in four groups based on donor age (<60 years; 60-69 years; 70-79 years and ≥80 years) and their outcomes were compared. A total of 842 patients were included: 348 (41.3%) with donors <60 years; 176 (20.9%) with donors 60-69 years; 233 (27.7%) with donors 70-79 years and 85 (10.1%) with donors ≥80 years. There was no difference across groups in terms of early (≤30 days) graft loss, and graft survival at 1 and 5 years was 90.5% and 78.6% for grafts <60 years; 88.6% and 81.3% for grafts 60-69 years; 87.6% and 75.1% for grafts 70-79 years and 84.7% and 77.1% for grafts ≥80 years (p = 0.065). In the group ≥80 years, the 5-year graft survival was lower for HCV-positive versus HCV-negative recipients (62.4% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.034). Based on our experience, grafts from donors ≥80 years may provide favorable results but require appropriate selection and allocation policies.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with everolimus and sorafenib for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is still associated with a dismal outcome. Combination therapy with everolimus (EVL) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor sorafenib (SORA) is based on the role of both b-Raf and mammalian target of rapamycin/protein kinase B pathways in the pathogenesis of HCC and is being investigated in clinical practice. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis on LT recipients with unresectable HCC recurrence and undergoing combination therapy with EVL and SORA. Patients were included if they were switched to EVL+SORA at any time after surgery. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after both LT and recurrence, and response to treatment based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary analysis was safety of combination therapy with EVL and SORA in the population of patients who received ≥1 dose of the study drug. RESULTS: Seven patients (100% male; median age 53 years [interquartile range (IQR) 9 years]) were considered for analysis. HCC recurrence was diagnosed at a median (IQR) interval since LT of 9 (126) months, and patients were administered EVL+SORA at a median interval since LT of 11 (126) months. Baseline immunosuppression was with tacrolimus (TAC) in 2 patients (28.6%), cyclosporine (CsA) in 2 (28.6%), and EVL monotherapy in 3 (42.8%). At a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.5 (14) months, 5 patients (71.4%) were alive, 4 of them (57.1%) with tumor progression according to the mRECIST criteria. Median (IQR) time to progression was 3.5 (12) months. Two patients died at a median (IQR) follow-up of 5 (1) months owing to tumor progression in 1 patient (14.3%) and sepsis in the other (14.3%). EVL monotherapy was achieved in 6 patients (85.7%), whereas 1patient (14.3%) could not withdraw from calcineurin inhibitor owing to acute rejection. Treatment complications were: hand-foot syndrome in 5 patients (71.4%), hypertension in 1 (14.3%), alopecia in 1 (14.3%), hypothyroidism in 1 (14.3%), diarrhea in 2 (28.6%), pruritus in 1 (14.3%), abdominal pain in 1 (14.3%), rash in 1 (14.3%), asthenia in 3 (42.8%), anorexia in 3 (42.8%), and hoarseness in 2 (28.6%). Adverse events led to temporary SORA discontinuation in 2 patients (28.6%) and to SORA dose reduction in 3 (42.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of HCC recurrence after LT with a combination regimen of EVL+ SORA is challenging because of SORA-related complications. Longer follow-up periods and larger series are needed to better capture the impact of such combination treatment on tumor progression and patient survival.

Organ sharing in the management of acute liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (OLT) for acute liver failure (ALF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in the early posttransplant course. An efficient organ-sharing organization may grant favorable results. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on patients wait listed for ALF at a single center. Patients were listed for OLT when matching King's College Criteria. Based on patients' clinical status, ABO-incompatible grafts were used. RESULTS: From January 2001 to December 2010, 37 patients were wait listed for ALF. Two patients were de-listed (5.4%) for improvement of their clinical conditions; two patients (5.4%) died on the list and 33 (89.2%) underwent OLT. Among these latter, 21 (63.6%) were Italian and 12 (36.4%) were foreign citizens, with four referred from their home country on the basis of international agreements on ALF management. Donors were procured in our region in 10 cases (30.3%), nationally in 22 (66.6%), and outside Italy in 1 (3.1%). Mean time from wait listing to OLT was 1 day (range 0-6), and seven patients received an ABO-incompatible graft. Graft and patient survivals at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years were 78.8%, 72.7%, 66.5%, and 81.8%, 75.8%, and 72.7%, respectively. Five patients underwent retransplantation: two on postoperative day (POD) 2 for primary nonfunction of the liver graft, two on POD 8 and 95 for hepatic artery thrombosis, and one at 18 months for nonanastomotic biliary stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt referral to a OLT center and efficient organ-sharing system play a fundamental role in optimizing the outcome of the patient with ALF. Development of international organ exchange programs might further improve the results for this category of patients. In very selected cases, ABO-incompatible grafts may be a valuable resource.