Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Norwegian single-center experience of 242 procedures.

BACKGROUND: The last 15 years have been characterized by a rapid expansion of minimally invasive surgery as treatment for adrenal diseases. During these years, both indications and surgical techniques have shown improvements. This study analyzed an 11-year single-center experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and April 2008, 242 laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed in 220 patients at Rikshospitalet University Hospital. Of these, 192 patients were operated on for benign lesions, 23 for malignant lesions, and in 5 cases "en bloc" adrenalectomies were performed. Benign lesions included 136 hormonally active lesions (41 pheochromocytomas, 48 Conn adenomas, 25 Cushing adenomas, and 18 patients with Cushing's disease) and 56 with hormonally inactive lesions (among them, 47 nonfunctional adenomas). Malignant lesions included 16 adrenal metastases and 7 adrenocortical carcinomas. RESULTS: All adrenalectomies were completed laparoscopically. The median time of unilatateral adrenalectomy was 85 (range, 35-325) minutes. The median blood loss was 0 (range, 0-1100) mL. There were 6 intraoperative and 7 postoperative minor complications. The number of complications did not differ between the types of adrenal pathology. Only 19% of the patients required opioids postoperatively. Per- and postoperative parameters were homogeneous among patients with different adrenal lesions. The patients with adrenocortical carcinoma had a distinctive intraoperative course with an evidently longer operative time and higher blood loss. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 (range, 1-15) days. Hospital stay was the only postoperative parameter where a difference was found between patients with different adrenal lesions. The patients with carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and Cushing's disease had the longest median postoperative stay, respectively, 5 (range, 2-6), 3 (range, 1-15), and 3 (range, 2-6) days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe, effective procedure providing improved fast and uncomplicated patient recovery independent of the type of adrenal lesion. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be easily introduced and may soon replace traditional open surgery in specialized centers.

Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety.

BACKGROUND: Very few randomized studies on laparoscopic (L) versus open (O) living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) have been presented. The largest randomized series reported so far included 80 donors. In 2000, an Australian safety group concluded that the evidence base for L-LDN is inadequate to make recommendations regarding safety and efficacy. METHODS: With this background, at our single national center, 122 donors were randomized to left-sided L-LDN (n=63) or O-LDN (n=59), from February 2001 to May 2004. This article summarizes our experiences, in particular regarding complications and safety. RESULTS: There were significant differences in favor of O-LDN regarding operative time, warm ischemia time, and vessel lengths, whereas the analgesic requirements and pain data were significantly in favor of the laparoscopic procedure. In the L-LDN group, there were five major postoperative complications resulting in reoperations (8%), including two intestinal perforations. No major complications occurred in the O-LDN group. CONCLUSIONS: These results from our randomized study do suggest that conventional O-LDN is a very secure procedure, superior to L-LDN regarding donor safety. There has been an unacceptably high rate of reoperations in our L-LDN series but without mortality or significant sequelae. A careful look at some other L-LDN series also suggests increased morbidity/mortality. Our data do, however, support the view that a perfect, uncomplicated L-LDN appears to be the superior procedure, and the laparoscopic procedure is still evolving. Donor safety may be improved by avoiding obese donors, stapling of the renal artery (not clipping), and perhaps by hand assistance. Furthermore, we will consider the retroperitoneal approach.

C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?

Presently, there is little knowledge regarding cyclosporine (CsA) concentration at 2 hr post-dose (C2) monitoring in maintenance patients. This study evaluates the actual C2 range in stable renal transplant recipients (who underwent transplantation >12 months ago). In addition, we investigated whether underexposure or overexposure to CsA (assessed by C2) affects graft function (as measured by serum [S]-creatinine). All renal transplant recipients in Norway receiving CsA were asked to participate; 1447 fulfilled the criteria. Valid C2 and CsA trough concentration (C0) measurements were performed in 1032 renal transplant recipients (71%) monitored by C0. Target C0 level was 75 to 125 mumol/L. CsA levels were measured using a Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay method, and all analyses were performed in the same laboratory (overall mean [+/-standard deviation] CsA C0=112+/-31 mug/L, CsA C2=697+/-211 mug/L [range 81-1580 mug/L], CsA dose [mg/day]=208+/-61, CsA dose [mg/kg/day]=2.8+/-1.1, and S-creatinine=141+/-58 mumol/L). A univariate analysis of variance showed that patients with C2 levels between 700 and 800 mug/L (n=203, S-creatinine=136+/-49 mumol/L) had significantly lower S-creatinine levels compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 mug/L (n=94, S-creatinine=152+/-56 mumol/L) (P<0.02). The same was true for patients with C2 levels less than 450 mug/L (n=95, S-creatinine 141+/-72 mumol/L) (P<0.05) when compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 mug/L. There was no significant difference in S-creatinine between patients in the low and intermediate C2 group; 666 patients had C0 levels in the therapeutic range (75-125 mumol/L). A linear regression showed a significant relation between S-creatinine and C2 for these patients (P=0.03). The corresponding relation between S-creatinine and C0 was nonsignificant (P=0.3). Monitoring of C2 in maintenance patients is a valuable tool to detect overexposure to CsA. Until results from prospective studies are available, we recommend C0 in the therapeutic range and reduction in CsA in overexposed patients, aiming at a C2 value between 700 and 800 mug/L.

Donor lymphocytes transferred with the graft to kidney recipients. Potential for establishing microchimerism.

After solid organ transplantation donor lymphocytes have been shown to survive and multiply in the organ recipient for a prolonged period. It is not clear whether this chimerism detected is the result of immunosuppression or the cause of allograft acceptance. The number of cells transferred, as well as the type of cells, and the degree of activation are likely to be of importance for the establishment of microchimerism. The cells that are flushed out of the vascular tree may be of particular importance since when an antigen primarily bypasses or secondarily avoids organised lymphoid collections, the immune system in the recipient may remain or become "indifferent" to its presence. In the present study we examined the amount of residual donor blood cells that we could flush out from the vascular tree of living donor kidneys and cadaveric donor kidneys immediately prior to transplantation, with special emphasis on T and B lymphocytes. Our study shows that perfusion of donor kidneys just prior to transplantation releases from 0.1 to 1.8x10(6) B-lymphocytes, with an average of 0.7x10(6) and from 0.5x10(6) to 2.6x10(6) T-lymphocytes, with an average of 1.8x10(6), for CD kidneys, and somewhat less for LD kidneys. These cells would otherwise have been flushed out into the organ recipient's circulation, where they might play a role in the establishment of microchimerism.