2008 Survey of Pro Bono Services Provided by Practicing Prosthodontists.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to analyze data from the results of the 2008 Survey of Pro Bono Services Provided by Practicing Prosthodontists. Survey results are used to examine characteristics and to compare the charitable care rendered by practicing prosthodontists to the dental field at large. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The character and incidence of pro bono services (PBS) provided by prosthodontists are based on a 2008 survey, made possible through an American College of Prosthodontists Board of Directors' sponsored initiative. Survey results are used to assess the distribution of respondents practicing the specialty of prosthodontics in the United States, percentage of prosthodontists who render pro bono dental services for the community, percentage of total patient care devoted to pro bono treatment at no charge, number of patients treated annually with PBS, monetary value of pro bono care annually, types of pro bono procedures, percentage of practitioners using Prosthodontic Diagnostic Index (PDI), PBS by PDI category to assess complexity of donated work, and percentage of practicing prosthodontists using informatics to track services by the PDI. RESULTS: Thirty-nine states were represented in the survey data. The highest responses were in the most populous states. The percentage of practicing prosthodontists providing PBS was 71.7%. For this cohort, the annual percentage of total care provided for treatment at no fee was greater than 1% in more than 54.8% of the practices. Almost 50% of these prosthodontists reported treating more than five patients per year at no charge. The average annual value of donated services was $25,078.00. The types of services rendered were most frequently diagnostic (83.5%) and radiographic (76.6%), followed by operative dentistry (61.5%) and fixed prosthodontics (49.4%). The percentage of practicing prosthodontists using the PDI to establish the complexity of PBS was 17.9%. For those using the PDI, there was almost an even distribution in categories I-IV. Informatics was used to track PBS in only 3% of the respondents. CONCLUSION: Based on this survey, practicing prosthodontists compare favorably to dental generalists and other specialists in terms of the annual dollar value donated in pro bono care. Their treatment addresses a broad scope of prosthodontic services including the restoration of patients with complex needs.

Private practice of prosthodontists: current conditions of practice in the United States.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to examine data and results from the 2008 Survey of Prosthodontists. Survey results are used to examine current trends and characteristics of prosthodontists in private practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Characteristics of prosthodontists and conditions of private practice are based on surveys conducted in 2002, 2005, and 2008 sponsored by the American College of Prosthodontists. Survey results are used to estimate several characteristics including age, gender, number of patient visits, hours in the practice, employment of staff, referral sources, and financial conditions (gross receipts, expenses of the practice, and net income of prosthodontists). RESULTS: The average age of a private-practicing prosthodontist reached 51 years in 2007; 12.3 is the number of years in the current practice; and most prosthodontists (71%) are solo private practitioners. The average amount of time per week by prosthodontists in the practice averaged 36.1 hours, and prosthodontists treated an average of 44.1 patient visits per week. The largest source of patient referrals is the patient themselves. The largest percentage of a prosthodontist's treatment time is spent rendering procedures in fixed prosthodontics, but this percentage has declined since 2001. In 2007, the average gross billings of a practicing prosthodontist reached $805,675; average total practice expenses were $518,255; the mean net earnings of practitioners were $268,930. CONCLUSION: In 2007, prosthodontists in private practice paid out about $1.4 billion in practice expenses to provide $2.2 billion dollars in prosthodontic care. Based on survey results from 2007 and the previous 6 years, specialization in prosthodontic care continues to be an economically attractive and productive healthcare profession in the United States.

The private practice of prosthodontists: current and future conditions of practice in the United States (part 2).

PURPOSE: Data are used to examine current and future conditions important to the private practice of prosthodontics. A concern is raised as to whether the future supply of prosthodontists is in sync with the dynamics of the US population and patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four trends are examined using data from various sources. The trends include: (1) growth in the number of private practicing prosthodontists, (2) projections of the future number of private practicing prosthodontists, (3) first year enrollment in dental schools, and (4) enrollments and graduates in residency programs. RESULTS: The number of private practicing prosthodontists has increased modestly over the past 21 years, growing 1.33% per year. The number of private practitioners is projected to reach 4,125 in 2025. A key variable in this projection is the growing number of elderly adults. While dental school enrollments have been increasing, concern is raised about the amount of exposure by students to an undergraduate curriculum in prosthodontics. There has been a general decline in enrollment in the nation's prosthodontics residency programs at the rate of -2.9% per year. An average of 181 program graduates are needed to achieve the 4125 projected number of private practitioners. CONCLUSION: Increasing demand for services from prosthodontists is supported by an increasing US population size and a growing population of elderly. Efforts to grow the number of private practicing prosthodontists will have to consider several concerns including residency program enrollments, undergraduate exposure to prosthodontics, and the overall economic returns expected from engaging in the private practice of prosthodontics. Choosing a career as a private practicing prosthodontist is a timely consideration and complimented by expected increases in demand for care and favorable financial returns to practice.

Prosthodontists in private practice: current and future conditions of practice in the United States (part I).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use data from surveys of prosthodontists to examine the current conditions and characteristics of prosthodontists in private practice in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Characteristics of prosthodontists and conditions of practice are based on the 2002 Survey of Prosthodontists and the 2005 Survey of Prosthodontists. Both surveys were conducted by the American College of Prosthodontists. Several characteristics of private practice/practitioners are estimated including age, gender, number of patient visits, hours in the practice, employment of staff, and financial conditions (gross receipts, expenses of the practice, and net income of prosthodontists) RESULTS: In 2004, the average age of private practitioners was 50 years. Years since graduation from dental school averaged 23.4 years, and years since completion of residency was 18.3 years. Prosthodontists spent an average of 35.7 hours per week in the office and 29.5 hours treating patients. In 2004, the average gross revenue per owner of a private practice reached $782,130, and mean net income was $258,490. The largest percentage of prosthodontist time was spent providing six procedures including fixed prosthodontics, implant services, complete dentures, operative care, diagnosis, and partial dentures. CONCLUSION: The United States spends about $1.8 billion on prosthodontic services provided by prosthodontists in private practice. Prosthodontists spend $1.1 billion dollars in expenses and treat an estimated 1.1 million patients per year.

Prosthodontics as a specialty private practice: net income of private practitioners.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use data from a survey of prosthodontists in the US to examine average net earnings of prosthodontists in private practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of 2500 prosthodontists in the US was used to estimate the net earnings of practicing prosthodontists. The national average net earnings of prosthodontists in private practice was estimated along with average earnings for subgroups of prosthodontists. Estimates for private practitioners by age, gender, size of practice, full-time/part-time status, practice ownership, and by type of treatment procedures rendered by the practitioner were also included. RESULTS: Average earnings for prosthodontists in private practice on a primary or secondary basis were estimated to be $215,300 and for prosthodontists who own or share in the ownership of a private practice, $233,920. Reported earnings estimates ranged from $96,160 for non-owners of a private practice and $103,350 for part-time private practitioners to $233,920 for practice owners and $275,170 for prosthodontists in practice with two prosthodontists. The average earnings of prosthodontists who are practice owners were estimated to be 35% higher than the corresponding general practitioners. CONCLUSION: Average net earnings are often used to examine the current economic health of a profession. The average net earnings of prosthodontists in private practice exceed the average net income reported by the American Dental Association for all dentists and all general practitioners and they are competitive with earnings among all specialty groups. This evaluation of the net earnings of prosthodontists shows that prosthodontics offers a competitive career opportunity for the general dentist with a personal desire to pursue advanced dental education in a specialty as a profession.

Private practice and the economic rate of return for residency training as a prosthodontist.

BACKGROUND: The authors used survey data to estimate the economic rate of return from undertaking an investment in residency training to become a practicing prosthodontist. METHODS: The authors estimated earnings of practicing prosthodontists using results from a survey of 2500 U.S. prosthodontists. Survey data were used to assess the total costs of prosthodontic residency and earnings of practicing general practitioners. The authors applied statistical methods to estimate the internal rate of return (IRR) for prosthodontic residency training. RESULTS: The estimated IRR ranged from 8.23 percent for private practitioners with no financial assistance during residency training to 12.18 percent for full-time private practitioners with stipends and loans. Total costs of residency ranged from 271,835 dollars to 441,321 dollars, depending on the amount of forgone earnings, time in practice and how soon practice began after the residency. CONCLUSIONS: All of the estimates of IRR in this study were positive, indicating that prosthodontic residency is a financially attractive investment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The positive IRR for prosthodontic residency indicates that the demand for advanced education in prosthodontics will continue, and that the amount of time spent in practice increases the rate of return.