Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 230(4): 392-5, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23629789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy using bevacizumab or ranibizumab for retinal macroaneurysms with macular exudation. METHODS: In a retrospective interventional case series patients with retinal macroaneurysms were treated with either 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab or 0.5 mg ranibizumab as first-line therapy. Patients were imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. Retreatment was performed in case of persistent intraretinal or subretinal fluid in optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Ten patients (10 eyes) with macroaneurysm involving the macula were treated with an average of 3.0 intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Mean best corrected visual acuity of all patients improved by 17 letters from baseline to the last follow-up visit. In 7 out of 10 patients, the fovea was affected by a secondary edema. In cases with foveal involvement, central retinal thickness decreased from 366 µm at baseline to 266 µm at the last follow-up visit. In the course of treatment 8 out of 10 patients showed evidence of marked regression of macular exsudation. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy appears to be a promising treatment alternative to laser treatment in cases of retinal macroaneurysms with macular exudation.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Retinal Artery/drug effects , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Ranibizumab , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 229(4): 369-73, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22499554

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In clinical practice the temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) is still believed to be the "gold standard". The purpose of this study was to compare the histopathological findings of the TAB with duplex sonography of the temporal artery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our retrospective study we analysed 85 consecutive patients (52 female, mean age 71.5, range 55 - 91 years; 33 male, mean age 71.6, range 44 - 91 years) with suspected GCA who underwent TAB in our clinic between January 1999 - February 2011. All patients received a preoperative duplex sonography, 57 patients including description of the temporal arteries. RESULTS: 38 of 85 (44.7 %) of the artery biopsies were proven positive for GCA by histopathology. Interpretation of the duplex sonography was congruent of histopathological interpretation of the biopsy in 39 patients (68.4 %) and incongruent in 18 patients (31.6 %). Sensitivity of duplex-sonography was 44.4 %, specificity 90 %, positive predictive value 80 %. DISCUSSION: Duplex sonography is a non-invasive and very helpful diagnostic tool to guide the clinician in cases of suspected GCA but needs considerable skills. It shows a good specificity and relatively high positive predictive value as there are only few false positive results. A negative report however does not rule out GCA, so that in our opinion the TAB - at least in those cases - should still be performed.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Temporal Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Temporal Arteries/pathology , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...