ABSTRACT
A 70-year-old female patient presented with unilateral blindness of the right eye. As Creactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were inconspicuous, a nonarteritic embolic occlusion was assumed; however, after detailed anamnesis large vessel vasculitis (LVV) appeared more likely, which was confirmed by the subsequent imaging diagnostics. This rare case of LVV without an increase in one of the inflammatory parameters CRP or ESR highlights the importance of the medical history and targeted diagnostic procedures.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The clinical success non-invasive imaging of CXCR4 expression using [68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor-PET warrants an expansion of the targeting concept towards conventional scintigraphy/SPECT with their lower cost and general availability. To this aim, we developed and comparatively evaluated a series of 99mTc-labeled cyclic pentapeptides based on the PentixaFor scaffold. METHODS: Six mas3-conjugated CPCR4 analogs with different 4-aminobenzoic acid (Abz)-D-Ala-D-Arg-aa3 linkers (L1-L6) as well as the corresponding HYNIC- and N4-analogs of L6-CPCR4 were synthesized via standard SPPS. Competitive binding studies (IC50 and IC50inv) were carried out using Jurkat T cell lymphoma cells and [125I]FC-131 as radioligand. Internalization kinetics were investigated using hCXCR4-overexpressing Chem-1 cells. Biodistribution studies and small animal SPECT/CT imaging (1 h p.i.) were carried out using Jurkat xenograft bearing CB17/SCID mice. Based on the preclinical results, [99mTc]Tc-N4-L6-CPCR4 ([99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec) was selected for an early translation to the human setting. Five patients with hematologic malignancies underwent [99mTc]Tc-N4-L6-CPCR4 SPECT/planar imaging with individual dosimetry. RESULTS: Of the six mas3-conjugated peptides, mas3-L6-CPCR4 (mas3-dap-r-a-Abz-CPCR4) showed the highest CXCR4 affinity (IC50 = 5.0 ± 1.3 nM). Conjugation with N4 (N4-L6-CPCR4) further improved hCXCR4 affinity to 0.6 ± 0.1 nM. [99mTc]Tc-N4-L6-CPCR4 also showed the most efficient internalization (97% of total cellular activity at 2 h) and the highest tumor accumulation (8.6 ± 1.3% iD/g, 1 h p.i.) of the compounds investigated. Therefore, [99mTc]Tc-N4-L6-CPCR4 (termed [99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec) was selected for first-in-human application. [99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec was well tolerated, exhibits a favorable biodistribution and dosimetry profile (2.1-3.4 mSv per 500 MBq) and excellent tumor/background ratios in SPECT and planar imaging. CONCLUSION: The successive optimization of the amino acid composition of the linker structure and the N-terminal 99mTc-labeling strategies (mas3 vs HYNIC vs N4) has provided [99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec as a novel, highly promising CXCR4-targeted SPECT agent for clinical application. With its excellent CXCR4 affinity, efficient internalization, high uptake in CXCR4-expressing tissues, suitable clearance/biodistribution characteristics, and favorable human dosimetry, it holds great potential for further clinical use.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Mice , Animals , Humans , Tissue Distribution , Mice, SCID , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Radionuclide ImagingABSTRACT
The interobserver agreement for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study interpretations in patients with prostate cancer is unknown. Methods:68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was performed in 50 patients with prostate cancer for biochemical recurrence (n = 25), primary diagnosis (n = 10), biochemical persistence after primary therapy (n = 5), or staging of known metastatic disease (n = 10). Images were reviewed by 16 observers who used a standardized approach for interpretation of local (T), nodal (N), bone (Mb), or visceral (Mc) involvement. Observers were classified as having a low (<30 prior 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT studies; n = 5), intermediate (30-300 studies; n = 5), or high level of experience (>300 studies; n = 6). Histopathology (n = 25, 50%), post-external-beam radiation therapy prostate-specific antigen response (n = 15, 30%), or follow-up PET/CT (n = 10, 20%) served as a standard of reference. Observer groups were compared by overall agreement (% patients matching the standard of reference) and Fleiss' κ with mean and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Agreement among all observers was substantial for T (κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59-0.64) and N (κ = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76) staging and almost perfect for Mb (κ = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91) staging. Level of experience positively correlated with agreement for T (κ = 0.73/0.66/0.50 for high/intermediate/low experience, respectively), N (κ = 0.80/0.76/0.64, respectively), and Mc staging (κ = 0.61/0.46/0.36, respectively). Interobserver agreement for Mb was almost perfect irrespective of prior experience (κ = 0.87/0.91/0.88, respectively). Observers with low experience, when compared with intermediate and high experience, demonstrated significantly lower median overall agreement (54% vs. 66% and 76%, P = 0.041) and specificity for T staging (73% vs. 88% and 93%, P = 0.032). Conclusion: The interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for prostate cancer staging is highly consistent among observers with high levels of experience, especially for nodal and bone assessments. Initial training on at least 30 patient cases is recommended to ensure acceptable performance.
