Strain reduction screws for nonunions following fixation around the elbow - A case series and review of the literature.

Background: Nonunions following fracture fixation result in significant patient morbidity and financial burden. Traditional operative management around the elbow consists of removal of metalwork, debridement of the nonunion and re-fixation with compression, often with bone grafting. Recently, some authors in the lower limb literature have described a minimally invasive technique used for select nonunions where simply placing screws across the nonunion facilitates healing by reducing inter-fragmentary strain. To our knowledge, this has not been described around the elbow, where traditional more invasive techniques continue to be employed. Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the application of strain reduction screws for management of select nonunions around the elbow. Methods & Results: We describe 4 cases (two humeral shaft, one distal humerus and one proximal ulna) of established nonunion following previous internal fixation, where minimally invasive placement of strain reduction screws were used. In all cases, no existing metal work was removed, the nonunion site was not opened, and no bone grafting or biologic stimulation was used. Surgery was performed between 9 and 24 months after the original fixation. 2.7 mm or 3.5 standard cortical screws were placed across the nonunion without lagging. Three fractures went on to unite with no further intervention required. One fracture required revision fixation using traditional techniques. Failure of the technique in this case did not adversely affect the subsequent revision procedure and has allowed refinement of the indications. Conclusion: Strain reduction screws are safe, simple and effective technique to treat select nonunions around the elbow. This technique has potential to be a paradigm shift in the management of these highly complex cases and is the first description in the upper limb to our knowledge.

Elbow arthroplasty in trauma-current concepts review.

Introduction: Despite advancements in modern locking plate technology, distal humerus fractures in the elderly remain difficult to treat. A subset of fractures in this osteoporotic bone includes multiple, shallow articular fragments that renders fixation unreliable, precluding early motion and acceptable functional outcomes. Arthroplasty, in the form of either Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) or Distal Humeral Hemiarthroplasty (DHH) are alternative treatment options in this cohort and are being increasingly used. Methods: This article reviews the use of TEA or DHH for acute distal humerus fracture, including patient selection, pre-operative planning, surgical approach, implant positioning, rehabilitation, outcomes and complications. Results: Arthroplasties are being increasingly used for acute distal humerus fractures, however they introduce potential complications not seen with fixation. Due care must be employed to correct implant positioning which is a function of implant rotation, implant length and implant sizing. We describe a robust technique for epicondyle repair in DHH and unlinked TEA to avoid instability. Outcomes of DHH and TEA for acute distal humerus fracture are encouraging, however further long-term outcome and comparative data regarding arthroplasty is required. Conclusions: Short to medium term outcomes demonstrate that both DHH and TEA are valuable options for selected patients, although attention to technique is required to minimise potential complications.

Treatment of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures - A survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society surgical membership.

Background: Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures result in weakness and deformity. While in other jurisdictions the rate of surgical repair has outpaced rises in incidence, UK practice for distal biceps tendon ruptures is unknown. The aim of this survey was to characterise current UK clinical practice. Methods: An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions covered respondent demographics, clinical decision making, surgical experience and willingness to be involved in future research. Results: A total of 242 surgeons responded; 99% undertook acute distal biceps tendon repairs with 83% repairing at least half of all distal biceps tendon ruptures, and 84% of surgeons would have their own, hypothetical, acute distal biceps tendon rupture repaired in their dominant arm and 67% for their non-dominant arm. Patient age, occupation and restoration of strength were the commonest factors underpinning a recommendation of surgical fixation. Most surgeons (87%) supported a national trial to study operative and non-operative treatments. Conclusions: UK upper limb surgeons currently advise surgical repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures for the majority of their patients. This is despite a paucity of evidence to support improved outcomes following surgical, rather than non-operative, management. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation in this area.

Establishing the shadowline: the border between legally acceptable and unacceptable standards of surgical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Our study investigated how the standard of surgical care is assessed within the English and Welsh litigation process. The 'shadowline' represents the dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable standards of care. Our hypothesis was that different assessors risk adopting materially different interpretations regarding the acceptable standard of care. Any variation in the interpretation of where the shadowline falls will create uncertainty and unfairness to surgeons and patients alike. METHODS: We summarised the legal literature and suggested the factors affecting the assessment of surgical standards. We illustrated our findings on distribution curves. RESULTS: There was a risk that the shape of the curve and the location of the shadowline may vary according to the assessor. Importantly, a gap may have developed between the legal and clinical shadowlines in respect of the consenting process. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We suggested how a gap between the surgical and legal shadow lines could be narrowed. Clinical governance, balanced literature and realistic expert assessments were all part of the solution.

Informed consent: the view from the trenches.

We review some of the recent literature on consent for surgical procedures and suggest a scheme for obtaining surgical consent.

Longitudinal instability of the forearm.

The Essex Lopresti lesion is a rare triad of injury to the radial head, interosseous membrane of the forearm and distal radio-ulnar joint, which results in longitudinal instability of the radius. If unrecognized this leads to chronic pain and disability which is difficult to salvage. Early recognition and appropriate treatment is therefore desirable to prevent long-term problems. The aim of this article is to review the pathoanatomy of longitudinal radius instability and use the existing literature and authors' experience to provide recommendations for recognition and treatment of acute and chronic forearm instability, including description of the author's technique for interosseous membrane reconstruction.

Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? a systematic review.

AIMS: To date, there is insufficient evidence available to compare the outcome of cemented and uncemented fixation of the humeral stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: A systemic review comprising 41 clinical studies was performed to compare the functional outcome and rate of complications of cemented and uncemented stems in RSA. These included 1455 cemented and 329 uncemented shoulders. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. Variables were compared using pooled frequency-weighted means and relative risk ratios (RR). RESULTS: Uncemented stems had a significantly higher incidence of early humeral stem migration (p < 0.001, RR 18.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0 to 65.2) and non-progressive radiolucent lines (p < 0.001, RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.4), but a significantly lower incidence of post-operative fractures of the acromion compared with cemented stems (p = 0.004, RR 14.3, 95% CI 0.9 to 232.8). There was no difference in the risk of stem loosening or revision between the groups. The cemented stems had a greater relative risk of infection (RR 3.3, 95% CI 0.8 to 13.7), nerve injury (RR 5.7, 95% CI 0.7 to 41.5) and thromboembolism (RR 3.9, 95% CI 0.2 to 66.6). The functional outcome and range of movement were equivalent in the two groups. DISCUSSION: RSA performed with an uncemented stem gives them equivalent functional outcome and a better complication profile than with a cemented stem. The natural history and clinical relevance of early stem migration and radiolucent lines found with uncemented stems requires further long-term study. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: This study demonstrates that uncemented stems have at least equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with cemented stems when used for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.