Chemoradiation with Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Proton Collaborative Group Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy has been safely implemented in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but not locally advanced NSCLC owing to prohibitive toxicities with photon therapy. Proton therapy, however, may allow for safe delivery of hypofractionated radiation therapy. We sought to determine whether hypofractionated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy improves overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Proton Collaborative Group conducted a phase 1/2 single-arm nonrandomized prospective multicenter trial from 2013 through 2018. We received consent from 32 patients, of whom 28 were eligible for on-study treatment. Patients had stage II or III unresectable NSCLC (based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer's staging manual) and received hypofractionated proton therapy at 2.5 to 4 Gy per fraction to a total 60 Gy with concurrent platin-based doublet chemotherapy. The primary outcome was 1-year overall survival comparable to the 62% reported for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9410 trial. RESULTS: The trial closed early owing to slow accrual, in part, from a competing trial, RTOG 1308. Median patient age was 70 years (range, 50-86 years). Patients were predominantly male (n = 20), White (n = 23), and prior smokers (n = 27). Most had stage III NSCLC (n = 22), 50% of whom had adenocarcinoma. After a median follow-up of 31 months, the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 89% and 49%, respectively, and progression-free survival rates were 58% and 32%, respectively. No acute grade ≥3 esophagitis occurred. Only 14% developed a grade ≥3 radiation-related pulmonary toxic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated proton therapy delivered at 2.5 to 3.53 Gy per fraction to a total 60 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy provides promising survival, and additional examination through larger studies may be warranted.

Image-Guided Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Study.

PURPOSE: Due to the excellent outcomes with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the low treatment-related toxicities using proton therapy (PT), we investigated treatment outcomes and toxicities when delivering hypofractionated PT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2018, 22 patients with T1 to T2 N0M0 NSCLC (45% T1, 55% T2) received image-guided hypofractionated PT. The median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 58-90). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. Nine patients (41%) were treated with 48 GyRBE in 4 fractions for peripheral lesions, and 13 patients (59%) were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions for central lesions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities with computed tomography imaging for tumor assessment. The primary endpoint was grade 3 to 5 toxicity at 1 year. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 3.5 years (range, 0.2-8.8 years). The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 49%, respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 100% and 75%, respectively. The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 86%, 85%, and 95%, respectively. Four patients experienced in-field recurrences between 18 and 45 months after treatment. One patient (5%) developed a late grade 3 bronchial stricture requiring hospitalization and stent. CONCLUSION: Image-guided hypofractionated PT for early-stage NSCLC provides promising local control and long-term survival with a low likelihood of toxicity. Regional nodal and distant relapses remain a problem.

Image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering proton therapy in the management of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is challenging due to the proximity of critical normal structures to the tumor target. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our experience in treating centrally-located early-stage NSCLC with hypofractionated proton therapy (PT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2018, 23 patients with T1-T2N0M0 NSCLC (T1, 46%; T2, 54%) were treated with image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering PT. The median age at the time of treatment was 74 years (range, 58-88). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. All patients were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities weekly during treatment, and at regular follow-up intervals with CT imaging for tumor assessment. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, regional control, and metastases-free survival were evaluated using cumulative incidence with competing risks. RESULTS: Median follow-up for all patients was 3.2 years (range, 0.2-9.2 years). Overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 50% (95% CI, 27-79%), respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 71% (95% CI, 46-92%). The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 90%, 81%, and 87%, respectively. Three patients (13%) experienced local recurrences as their first recurrence, at a median time of 28 months from completion of radiation (range, 18-61 months). Two patients (9%) experienced late grade 3 toxicities, including 1 patient who developed a bronchial stricture that required stent placement. CONCLUSION: Image-guided hypofractionated PT for centrally-located early-stage NSCLC provides excellent local control with low rates of grade ≥3 toxicities. For tumors in sensitive locations, PT may provide safer treatment than photon-based treatments due to its dosimetric advantages.

Hypofractionated Proton Therapy with Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 1 Trial from the University of Florida and Proton Collaborative Group.

PURPOSE: We report the safety data from the first multicenter phase 1 trial investigating the use of hypofractionated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2013 through 2018, patients with newly diagnosed stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a multicenter phase 1 clinical trial evaluating concurrent chemotherapy with increasing dose-per-fraction proton therapy. This was a stepwise 5 + 2 dose-intensification protocol with the following dose arms: (1) 2.5 GyRBE per fraction to 60 GyRBE; (2) 3.0 GyRBE per fraction to 60 GyRBE; (3) 3.53 GyRBE per fraction to 60.01 GyRBE; and (4) 4.0 GyRBE per fraction to 60 GyRBE. A dose arm was considered tolerable if no radiation therapy-attributable severe adverse event (SAE) occurred within 90 days of treatment among 5 patients enrolled on the arm or if 1 SAE occurred among 7 patients enrolled. Dose constraints to the heart, brachial plexus, and spinal cord were more conservative at higher doses per fraction. RESULTS: The study closed early because of slow accrual and competing enrollment in NRG 1308 before accrual was met, with no maximum tolerated dose identified. Eighteen patients were treated, including 5 patients on arms 1 and 2, 7 patients on arm 3, and 1 patient on arm 4. Two SAEs occurred among 7 patients treated at 3.53 GyRBE per fraction; however, per outside expert review, both were attributed to chemotherapy and unrelated to radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated proton therapy delivered at 2.5 to 3.53 GyRBE per fraction to a dose of 60 GyRBE with concurrent chemotherapy has an acceptable toxicity profile. Further exploration of this regimen is warranted on a phase 2 clinical trial.

Impact of unfavorable factors on outcomes among inoperable stage II-IV Nonsmall cell lung cancer patients treated with proton therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of unfavorable risk factors among patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) treated with proton therapy (PT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May 2008 through July 2015, 90 consecutive patients with unresectable stage II-IV (oligometastatic) NSCLC were treated with PT. Unfavorable factors including age ≥80 years, stage IV, weight loss >10% in 3 months, performance status (PS) ≥2, FEV1 < 1.0 or O2 dependency, prior lung cancer, prior lung surgery, prior 2nd cancer in the past 3 years, and prior chest irradiation were evaluated. All patients received standard fractionation of 1.8-2 Gy(RBE) (median dose, 70 Gy[RBE]). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of unfavorable factors was analyzed in Cox regression models. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent were favorable-risk, while 42%, 22%, and 10% had 1-, 2-, or ≥3 unfavorable factors. The 2-year OS was 52% and 45% (p = .8522), and 2-year PFS was 21% and 44% (p = .0207), for favorable and unfavorable risk patients, respectively. Among patients with stage III-IV, only PS ≥2 adversely impacted OS (p = .0015). CONCLUSION: Most patients treated with PT for LA-NSCLC have unfavorable risk factors. These patients had similar outcomes to favorable-risk patients. Enrollment in future clinical trials may improve if eligibility is less restrictive.

Survivor and Caregiver Expectations and Preferences Regarding Lung Cancer Treatment.

PURPOSE: Treatment success in lung cancer is no longer restricted to objective measures of disease-specific outcomes and overall survival alone but now incorporates treatment morbidity and subjective quality of life (QoL). This study reports how lung cancer patients, survivors, and caregivers define treatment success and prioritize treatment decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey with both ranking and free-response questions was administered among lung cancer survivors and caregivers. Responses were used to evaluate treatment priorities, perceptions of treatment success based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, and troublesomeness of treatment-related toxicities. RESULTS: Among 61 respondents (29 lung cancer survivors, 28 caregivers of survivors, and 4 who were both survivors and caregivers), cancer cure was the highest priority when making treatment decisions for 74.5% of respondents, with QoL during and after treatment ranking second and third. Seventy percent of respondents felt that treatment morbidity resulting in complete dependence on others and spending the entire day confined to bed or chair would represent unsuccessful treatment. Requiring oxygen use was ranked as a very or extremely troublesome treatment toxicity by 64%, followed by shortness of breath (62%), fatigue (49%), chronic cough (34%), and appetite loss (30%). Even with remission, a 3- to 7-day hospital admission for pneumonia during treatment was deemed an unsuccessful outcome by 30%. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of physicians discussing in detail with their lung cancer patients their desires and goals. Accounting for factors like expected performance status following treatment, troublesomeness of treatment toxicities, and hospitalization rates may help guide treatment decisions.

Argatroban in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: rationale for use and place in therapy.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a recognized complication of heparin and requires urgent detection and treatment. HIT can be divided into two types, type I and type II, with type I being a transient decrease in platelet count without clinical consequence. For the purpose of this review, the term HIT refers to the immune-mediated type II that causes paradoxical thrombo-emboli. The aim of this review is to familiarize clinicians with a specific direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, in the treatment of HIT. Argatroban has been successfully employed in treating HIT in many different subsets of patients, including those with endstage renal disease on hemodialysis and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and those with multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.

Dosimetric rationale and early experience at UFPTI of thoracic proton therapy and chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Treatment with conventional x-ray therapy (XRT) is associated with high toxicity rates, particularly acute grade 3+ esophagitis and pneumonitis. We present outcomes for the first known series of limited-stage SCLC patients treated with proton therapy and a dosimetric comparison of lung and esophageal doses with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients were treated: five concurrently and one sequentially. Five patients received 60-66 CGE in 30-34 fractions once daily and one patient received 45 CGE in 30 fractions twice daily. All six patients received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v3.0, was used to grade toxicity. IMRT plans were also generated and compared with proton plans. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12.0 months. The one-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 83% and 66%, respectively. There were no cases of acute grade 3+ esophagitis or acute grade 2+ pneumonitis, and no other acute grade 3+ non-hematological toxicities were seen. One patient with a history of pulmonary fibrosis and atrial fibrillation developed worsening symptoms four months after treatment requiring oxygen. Three patients died: two of progressive disease and one after a fall; the latter patient was disease-free at 36 months after treatment. Another patient recurred and is alive, while two patients remain disease-free at 12 months of follow-up. Proton therapy proved superior to IMRT across all esophageal and lung dose volume points. CONCLUSION: In this small series of SCLC patients treated with proton therapy with radical intent, treatment was well tolerated with no cases of acute grade 3+ esophagitis or acute grade 2+ pneumonitis. Dosimetric comparison showed better sparing of lung and esophagus with proton therapy. Proton therapy merits further investigation as a method of reducing the toxicity of CRT.

Proton therapy for lung cancer.

Proton therapy is an emerging radiotherapy technology with the potential to improve the therapeutic index in the treatment of lung cancer patients. Since charged particles, such as protons, have a penetration length that can be modified by using different energies, protons offer the clinician the ability to modulate radiation dose deposition along the beam path. This facilitates an increase of the dose to the tumor target while minimizing the volume of normal tissue irradiation. Such precise delivery is particularly relevant in the setting of lung cancer where the targeted tissues are in close proximity to moderately radiation-sensitive organs like the spinal cord, heart, and esophagus, but are also effectively surrounded by the normal lung, which is extremely sensitive to radiation damage. Proton therapy has been investigated for the treatment of surgically curable yet medically inoperable patients as well as patients with regionally advanced disease.

Selective nodal irradiation of regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with proton therapy and IMRT: A dosimetric comparison.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the dosimetric impact of selective/elective nodal treatment with dose-escalated radiotherapy for regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using proton therapy (PT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Five consecutive patients with regionally advanced NSCLC underwent treatment planning for high-dose involved-field (IF) treatment (positron emission tomography-positive gross disease) with or without selective/elective nodal irradiation, defined as the extended field (EF). Four treatment plans were developed for each patient: i) IMRT to treat IF to 74 Gy (IFrT); ii) IMRT to treat high-risk nodes to 44 Gy and IF to 74 Gy (EFrT); iii) PT to treat IF to 74CGE (IFpT); and iv) PT to treat high-risk nodes to 44CGE and IF to 74CGE (EFpT). High-risk nodes were defined as mediastinal, hilar, and supraclavicular lymph node stations adjacent to foci of PET-positive gross disease. The IMRT and PT plans were isoeffective. Dose to organs at risk (OARs), including the lung, esophagus, heart and spinal cord, were evaluated. RESULTS: The average IF clinical target volume (CTV) was 397 cc (344-428), while the average EF CTV was 642 cc (530-753 cc). Comparing IMRT with PT, mean lung dose reduced 3.4 Gy/CGE and 3.7 Gy/CGE; lung V20 reduced 4% and 5% for EF and IF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Selective/elective nodal irradiation with protons reduces normal-lung exposure compared to selective/elective nodal irradiation with IMRT.

Proton radiation therapy offers reduced normal lung and bone marrow exposure for patients receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy for unresectable stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer: a dosimetric study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the potential benefit of proton radiation therapy over photon radiation therapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optimized 3-dimensional conformal photon (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy (PT) plans were generated for 8 consecutive patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer using the same target goals and normal tissue constraints. The radiation exposure to non-targeted normal structures, including lung, bone marrow, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord, were compared. Photon doses are expressed in gray (Gy). Proton doses are expressed in cobalt gray equivalents (CGE). RESULTS: In all patients, 3DCRT, IMRT, and PT plans, achieved the dose goals for the target volumes. Compared with the 3DCRT plans, proton plans offered a median 29% reduction in normal lung V(20) Gy (CGE), a median 33% reduction in mean lung dose (MLD), and a median 30% reduction in the volume of bone marrow receiving a dose of 10 Gy (CGE). Compared with the IMRT plans, the proton plans offered a median 26% reduction in normal lung V(20) Gy (CGE), a median 31% reduction in MLD, and a median 27% reduction in the volume of bone marrow receiving a dose of 10 Gy (CGE). CONCLUSION: By reducing the volumes of normal structures irradiated, protons can potentially improve the therapeutic index for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer receiving combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a growing complication of a common medication used to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized patients. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanism that causes paradoxical thrombus formation in HIT and ways to recognize this important complication with various testing modalities and to discuss the approaches to treatment once a diagnosis has been made. HIT is a clinical diagnosis that can be further supported by utilizing the "4 Ts": thrombocytopenia, timing of platelet count fall, thrombosis or other complications, and other causes for thrombocytopenia. Diagnosis of HIT can be established using an HIT antibody test. Once a drop in platelet count is observed in a patient, it is important to rule out HIT. When HIT is first suspected, it is important to discontinue all heparin products. The gold standard in diagnosing HIT is the 14C-serotonin release assay (14C-SRA) assay, which has high sensitivity and specificity but is technically demanding and more time consuming than other antibody-detecting immunoassays. Anticoagulation in HIT patients is essential due to the increased risk of thrombosis. Treatment consists of utilizing alternative, nonheparin anticoagulants like lepirudin, argatroban, bivalirudin, or fondaparinux (although fondaparinux is not formally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this condition). Each of these agents should be individually formulated based on the patient and the presence/absence of liver or renal failure. Treatment duration has yet to be determined. However, in patients requiring long-term anticoagulation (pulmonary embolism, DVT, stroke), the transition to warfarin can be made once the platelet count recovers and there has been at least 5 days of overlap with a nonheparin anticoagulant.

Improving frontline treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: emerging evidence for use of nilotinib and dasatinib.

The approval of imatinib in 2001 changed the landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) management, becoming the standard of care and improving the survival rates of patients. With the prevalent use of imatinib worldwide, it was observed that up to one-third of patients are resistant to or intolerant of imatinib therapy, fueling the search for safer and more effective agents. The newer and more potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and dasatinib were first indicated for the treatment of imatinib-resistant/-intolerant patients, for whom these agents are both safe and efficacious. More recent clinical studies have examined nilotinib and dasatinib in the frontline setting in newly diagnosed patients. Data reported from the phase III ENESTnd (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients) study and the DASISION (Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic-phase CML) trial support the use of nilotinib and dasatinib as potential new standards for frontline care of newly diagnosed patients with CML in chronic phase. Furthermore, both agents have received regulatory approval for use as frontline agents. These agents have demonstrated significantly superior efficacy compared with imatinib, as measured by complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response rates. In addition, progression to advanced disease was significantly lower for nilotinib, and a trend toward lower progression was observed with dasatinib. Although both nilotinib and dasatinib are generally well tolerated in the frontline setting, they have different safety profiles that may affect their selection as treatment. Understanding the efficacy, safety profiles, and patterns of resistance to various BCR-ABL1 mutations of these newer agents, as well as implementing management strategies to treat adverse events, will help physicians to provide the best therapy options for their patients with CML.

HIV-associated primary cervical non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and two other cases of primary pelvic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been few case series of primary pelvic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) reported over the past two decades, no patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related primary pelvic NHL has been reported. CASE: We report a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patient with primary cervical NHL. After surgical biopsy, she received standard NHL combination chemotherapy plus standard HIV highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and remains disease free 38 months since therapy. We also report two other cases of primary pelvic NHL. CONCLUSIONS: Primary pelvic NHL is rare, with clinical presentation similar to other common gynecologic malignancies. It is treated with combination chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy, and generally has good prognosis. Adding HAART to other standard therapies for patients with AIDS-related pelvic lymphoma may improve the prognosis of this category of patients.