ABSTRACT
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant increase in the use of empiric antibiotic therapy has been observed especially in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Improving antibiotic prescribing is one of the main goals of the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). The ASP pharmacists have a scope of practice that authorizes changes in anti-infective therapy. Methods: We aimed to describe antibiotic prescribing in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at Veterans Affairs Southern Nevada Healthcare System with a pharmacist-led ASP and to determine the prevalence of bacterial coinfection in this patient population. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the facility from November 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021. Results: A total of 199 patients were admitted to the hospital for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection during the study period and 61 patients (31%) received ≥ 1 antibiotic on hospital admission and 138 (69%) did not receive antibiotics. Forty-seven patients (77%) had antibiotics discontinued by the ASP team within 72 hours of admission. Of the 199 admitted, 6 (3%) had microbiologically confirmed bacterial coinfection. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism (3 sputum cultures) followed by Klebsiella oxytoca (2 sputum cultures). Sixteen patients (8%) developed a nosocomial infection during their hospital stay. Conclusions: Up to 31% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection received empiric antibiotic treatment for concern of bacterial coinfection. Pharmacist-led ASP led to early discontinuation of antibiotics in many patients. A thorough clinical workup to determine the risk of bacterial coinfection in patients with COVID-19 is important before starting empiric antibiotic therapy. It is essential to continue promoting the ASP during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure responsible antibiotic use and prevent antimicrobial resistance.
ABSTRACT
Background:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing can rapidly detect MRSA colonization via nasopharyngeal swab. With a high negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia, this test may help minimize the duration of anti-MRSA therapy and associated adverse drug events. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-initiated MRSA nasal PCR protocol on pneumonia therapy. Methods: This retrospective, quasi-experimental study evaluated adult patients with pneumonia before and after the implementation of a pharmacist-initiated MRSA nasal PCR protocol. The primary outcome of this study was to compare duration of anti-MRSA therapy between the Pre-PCR group and PCR group. Secondary comparisons included duration of antipseudomonal therapy, time from intravenous (IV) to oral interchange, and clinical outcomes. Results: In total, 210 patients (Pre-PCR: n = 138, PCR: n = 72) were included. The MRSA nasal PCR result was negative for 63 patients (87.5%), and 56 (88.9%) vancomycin orders were discontinued within 24 hours of the negative result. The mean duration of vancomycin therapy was significantly shorter in the PCR group (2.5 vs 1.4 days, P < .001) as well as duration of IV therapy (5 vs 3.9 days, P = .003). There was no difference between groups in duration of antipseudomonal therapy (P = .425), acute kidney injury (AKI; P = .332), 30-day readmission (P = .137), or 30-day mortality (P = .179). Conclusion and Relevance: A pharmacist-driven MRSA nasal PCR protocol significantly decreased the duration of anti-MRSA therapy and IV antibiotics in patients with pneumonia. These findings add to the relatively small body of literature supporting pharmacist-initiated rapid diagnostic testing and follow-up.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To provide a summary of the most prominent peer-reviewed infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-related articles published in 2019. SUMMARY: Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) members were asked to nominate articles that they believed were most influential within the ID and HIV pharmacotherapy science communities. A total of 48 general ID and 6 HIV-related articles were nominated. Following nominations, an online survey was distributed via e-mail to Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) members, with a total of 156 and 54 members voting for general ID and HIV-related articles, respectively. The results of this survey were ranked to determine the top 10 general ID and top HIV articles. The top articles were then summarized by HIDN members, including residents, fellows, and clinical pharmacists. CONCLUSION: This review covers many of the most influential ID articles published in 2019, including 3 practice guideline updates. Due to the high rate of ID literature published each year, this review continues to help summarize these articles for the ID community, allowing clinicians to remain up-to-date on practice-changing publications in ID and HIV pharmacotherapy.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Peer Review , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Humans , PharmacistsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the impact of a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention on outpatient antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) in a primary care office. The primary outcome of this study was to characterize antibiotic prescribing over time. Secondary outcomes included describing ambulatory care pharmacist (ACP) workload and types of feedback given. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study was conducted within a primary care office. The office included a 0.6 full-time equivalent ACP and is part of a health system supported by a pharmacist and a physician co-led ASP. Education and guidelines were provided by the ACP and ASP leads before the intervention period August 2017-February 2018. The ACP provided bi-weekly audit of all URI and UTI prescriptions and written feedback to prescribers. RESULTS: During the 7-month intervention period, 1107 prescriptions were audited by the ACP, 825 URI and 282 UTI. The most common reasons for feedback included inappropriate agent (26.3%) or prolonged duration of therapy (24.3%). Guideline-concordant agent prescribed for a UTI increased from 20% at baseline to a median of 69.2%, whereas duration increased from 55% to 70.4%. Guideline-concordant agent prescribed for a URI increased from 43.3% to 86.8%, whereas the median duration of therapy decreased from 10 to 7 days. CONCLUSION: An ACP-led ASP intervention within a primary care office incorporating audit and feedback improved antibiotic prescribing for URIs and UTIs, including prescribing antibiotics when indicated, guideline-concordant antibiotic selection, and duration of therapy. Pharmacists practicing in ambulatory care settings may serve a vital role in leading successful outpatient ASP interventions.
