Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Med Case Rep J ; 15: 479-483, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36105875

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Postoperative surgical site infection remains one of the major complications after spinal surgery. IntraSPINE® (intraspine) is a dynamic intralaminar device introduced by Cousin Biotech and is indicated for the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disorders. There are no reports on delayed surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar surgery using this device. Case Presentation: A 29-year-old male patient was admitted to our department with complaints of moderate pain and chronic subcutaneous abscess with purulent flow from his old surgical scar. Thirty-four months ago, he underwent a traditional open bilateral L4 laminotomy without discectomy and intraspine insertion for the treatment of L4-5 central lumbar spinal stenosis at another hospital. The patient was discharged 4 days after surgery without radiating pain, and the surgical wound was well healed. He gradually returned to his normal activity and work. However, he experienced moderate pain, redness and swelling of his old surgical scar approximately one month before coming to our hospital, but he did not receive any treatment. One month later, he had a mass with purulent discharge at the surgical scar site, and he visited our hospital on December 29th, 2020. Based on the physical examination and MRI findings, delayed -SSI was diagnosed. The patient underwent removal of the intraspine device, debridement and wound closure with closed drainage. The wound healed satisfactorily, and the patient had no complaints more than 2 years later. Conclusion: A delayed surgical site infection following intraspine insertion may have occurred.

2.
Orthop Res Rev ; 14: 91-99, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35378735

ABSTRACT

Background: The radiological complications including correction loss and hardware failure of short segment posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures remain a main concern. Several procedures aiming to reinforce the anterior column have been introduced to solve these limitations, including transforaminal interbody fusion (TIF). The purposes of this study were to evaluate the radiological complications of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in combination with transforaminal interbody fusion in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods: This retrospective case series study enrolled patients with isolated unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures, who were treated by posterior short fixation with TIF between January 2013 and January 2017. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one and half years. For evaluation of correction loss, % loss of anterior vertebral body height (%AVB), vertebral kyphotic angle (VA) and regional kyphotic angle (RA) were collected preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Hardware failure was assessed on radiological images at the last follow-up. Results: There were 36 patients who met the inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up duration of 53 months. The mean correction loss of %AVB, VA and RA were 10.2%, 2.9° and 5.6°, respectively. There were 6 patients (16.7%) with hardware failure at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Short-segment posterior pedicle screw fixation with TIF using bone chip grafts does not completely prevent hardware failure and progressive kyphosis in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...