Accuracy of intraoperative estimation of femoral stem anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty by using a digital protractor and a spirit level.

BACKGROUND: The femoral component anteversion during surgery is traditionally assessed by a visual assessment of the surgeon and has proven to be imprecise. We sought to determine the accuracy of a digital protractor and a spirit level to measure the stem anteversion during cementless THA. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted among 107 patients (114 hips) who underwent primary cementless THA via posterolateral approach. A pipe with a spirit level was attached to the tibial tubercle and intermalleolar midpoint. While the leg was held perpendicularly to the floor, stem anteversion was estimated by 3 methods: method A by visual assessment; method B by a digital protractor alone; and method C by a digital protractor combined with a spirit level. The angles were compared with the true anteversion measured by postoperative CT scan. RESULTS: The average anteversion by method C (22.8° ± 6.9°, range -2° to 40°) was significantly lower than method A (24.6° ± 5.2°, range 0° to 30°) (p=0.033), but not different from the true anteversion (22.1° ± 8.2°, range -5.4° to 43.1°) (p=0.445). There were no significant differences between method B (23.2° ± 8.2°, range -4° to 45°) and method A, C or the true anteversion. The mean deviation of the intraoperative estimation from the true anteversion was 0.8° ± 3.7° (range -7.1° to 8.0°) by method C; 1.2° ± 5.1° (range -8.8° to 14.3°) by method B; and 2.5° ± 7.4° (range -19.0° to 16.0°) by method A. Estimation error within 5° was found in 107 hips (93.9%) with method C; 86 hips (75.4%) with method B; and 59 hips (51.8%) with method A. CONCLUSION: Accurate estimation of stem anteversion during cementless THA can be determined intraoperatively by the use of a digital protractor and a spirit level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( TCTR 20180326003 ). Registered on 20 March 2018. Retrospectively registered.

Use of a Digital Protractor and a Spirit Level to Determine the Intraoperative Anteversion of Femoral Component during Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: a Prospective Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Femoral stem anteversion during hip arthroplasty is generally estimated by eye intraoperatively and has proven to be different from targeted values. This study aims to determine the accuracy of a novel technique using a digital protractor and a spirit level to improve surgeons' estimation of stem anteversion. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized study was conducted among 93 patients with femoral neck fracture who underwent cemented hemiarthroplasty via posterolateral approach. In the control group (N=62), five experienced surgeons assessed stem anteversion related to the posterior femoral condylar plane using visual estimation with a target angle of 15°-25°. In the study group (N=31), another two surgeons assessed stem anteversion with the same target angle by placing a digital protractor on the femoral stem inserter handle while the assistant held the leg in the truly vertical position, verified by a spirit level that was attached to the shin with cable ties. Stem anteversion was measured blind, postoperatively, on 2D-CT and compared with the intraoperative results. RESULTS: The mean postoperative anteversion was 22.4° (-4.2° to 51.3°, SD 11.1°) in the control group and 23.0° (16.0° to 29.9°, SD 3.6°) in the study group (P=0.810). The study group had more stems positioned in 15°-25° anteversion (71.0% vs 32.3%, P=0.001) and the mean absolute value of surgeon error was -0.2° (-5.4° to 7.0°, SD 3.0°). Twenty-eight stems of the study group (90.3%) had an error within 5°. Surgeon overestimation >5° was found in 1 hip (3.2%) and underestimation >5° was found in 2 hips (6.4%). CONCLUSION: Using a digital protractor and a spirit level was reliable with high accuracy and precision to improve the intraoperative estimation of cemented stem anteversion.