Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Cancer Ther ; 13(11): 2583-94, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25193509

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) have been recognized as the principal cells responsible for the production of fibrosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Recently, PSCs have been noted to share characteristics with cells of monocyte-macrophage lineage (MML cells). Thus, we tested whether PSCs could be targeted with the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBP; pamidronate or zoledronic acid), which are potent MML cell inhibitors. In addition, we tested NBPs treatment combination with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) to enhance antitumor activity. In vitro, we observed that PSCs possess α-naphthyl butyrate esterase (ANBE) enzyme activity, a specific marker of MML cells. Moreover, NBPs inhibited PSCs proliferation, activation, release of macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and type I collagen expression. NBPs also induced PSCs apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in the G1 phase. In vivo, NBPs inactivated PSCs; reduced fibrosis; inhibited tumor volume, tumor weight, peritoneal dissemination, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation; and increased apoptosis in an orthotopic murine model of PDAC. These in vivo antitumor effects were enhanced when NBPs were combined with nab-paclitaxel but not gemcitabine. Our study suggests that targeting PSCs and tumor cells with NBPs in combination with nab-paclitaxel may be a novel therapeutic approach to PDAC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Stellate Cells/drug effects , Adult , Albumins/administration & dosage , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Drug Synergism , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mice , Mice, Nude , Pamidronate , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Stellate Cells/pathology , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
2.
Cancer Res ; 74(18): 5301-10, 2014 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24928781

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms that allow cancer cells to adapt to the typical tumor microenvironment of low oxygen and glucose and high lactate are not well understood. GPR81 is a lactate receptor recently identified in adipose and muscle cells that has not been investigated in cancer. In the current study, we examined GPR81 expression and function in cancer cells. We found that GPR81 was present in colon, breast, lung, hepatocellular, salivary gland, cervical, and pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Examination of tumors resected from patients with pancreatic cancer indicated that 94% (148 of 158) expressed high levels of GPR81. Functionally, we observed that the reduction of GPR81 levels using shRNA-mediated silencing had little effect on pancreatic cancer cells cultured in high glucose, but led to the rapid death of cancer cells cultured in conditions of low glucose supplemented with lactate. We also observed that lactate addition to culture media induced the expression of genes involved in lactate metabolism, including monocarboxylase transporters in control, but not in GPR81-silenced cells. In vivo, GPR81 expression levels correlated with the rate of pancreatic cancer tumor growth and metastasis. Cells in which GPR81 was silenced showed a dramatic decrease in growth and metastasis. Implantation of cancer cells in vivo was also observed to lead to greatly elevated levels of GPR81. These data support that GPR81 is important for cancer cell regulation of lactate transport mechanisms. Furthermore, lactate transport is important for the survival of cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res; 74(18); 5301-10. ©2014 AACR.


Subject(s)
Lactic Acid/metabolism , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Animals , Cell Death/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/physiology , HCT116 Cells , Hep G2 Cells , Heterografts , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Mice, Nude , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Transfection , Tumor Microenvironment
3.
Gastroenterology ; 145(6): 1449-58, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23958541

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Obesity is a risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but it is not clear how obesity contributes to pancreatic carcinogenesis. The oncogenic form of KRAS is expressed during early stages of PDAC development and is detected in almost all of these tumors. However, there is evidence that mutant KRAS requires an additional stimulus to activate its full oncogenic activity and that this stimulus involves the inflammatory response. We investigated whether the inflammation induced by a high-fat diet, and the accompanying up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), increases Kras activity during pancreatic carcinogenesis in mice. METHODS: We studied mice with acinar cell-specific expression of KrasG12D (LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice) alone or crossed with COX2 conditional knockout mice (COXKO/LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT). We also studied LSL-Kras/PDX1-Cre mice. All mice were fed isocaloric diets with different amounts of fat, and a COX2 inhibitor was administered to some LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice. Pancreata were collected from mice and analyzed for Kras activity, levels of phosphorylated extracellular-regulated kinase, inflammation, fibrosis, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), and PDACs. RESULTS: Pancreatic tissues from LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice fed high-fat diets (HFDs) had increased Kras activity, fibrotic stroma, and numbers of PanINs and PDACs than LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice fed control diets; the mice fed the HFDs also had shorter survival times than mice fed control diets. Administration of a COX2 inhibitor to LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice prevented these effects of HFDs. We also observed a significant reduction in survival times of mice fed HFDs. COXKO/LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice fed HFDs had no evidence for increased numbers of PanIN lesions, inflammation, or fibrosis, as opposed to the increases observed in LSL-Kras/Ela-CreERT mice fed HFDs. CONCLUSIONS: In mice, an HFD can activate oncogenic Kras via COX2, leading to pancreatic inflammation and fibrosis and development of PanINs and PDAC. This mechanism might be involved in the association between risk for PDAC and HFDs.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/physiopathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/physiopathology , Cyclooxygenase 2/physiology , Diet, High-Fat/adverse effects , Pancreatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/physiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adiposity/physiology , Animals , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cyclooxygenase 2/deficiency , Cyclooxygenase 2/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Fibrosis , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/physiology , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...