Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 64
Filter
1.
J Invest Dermatol ; 142(1): 166-178.e8, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237339

ABSTRACT

Sodium can accumulate in the skin at concentrations exceeding serum levels. A high sodium environment can lead to pathogenic T helper 17 cell expansion. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease in which IL-17‒producing T helper 17 cells play a crucial role. In an observational study, we measured skin sodium content in patients with psoriasis and in age-matched healthy controls by Sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with PASI > 5 showed significantly higher sodium and water content in the skin but not in other tissues than those with lower PASI or healthy controls. Skin sodium concentrations measured by Sodium-23 spectroscopy or by atomic absorption spectrometry in ashed-skin biopsies verified the findings with Sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging. In vitro T helper 17 cell differentiation of naive CD4+ cells from patients with psoriasis markedly induced IL-17A expression under increased sodium chloride concentrations. The imiquimod-induced psoriasis mouse model replicated the human findings. Extracellular tracer Chromium-51-EDTA measurements in imiquimod- and sham-treated skin showed similar extracellular volumes, rendering excessive water of intracellular origin. Chronic genetic IL-17A‒driven psoriasis mouse models underlined the role of IL-17A in dermal sodium accumulation and inflammation. Our data describe skin sodium as a pathophysiological feature of psoriasis, which could open new avenues for its treatment.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-17/metabolism , Psoriasis/metabolism , Skin/metabolism , Sodium/analysis , Th17 Cells/immunology , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/pathology , Sodium Chloride/metabolism , Spectrophotometry, Atomic , Spectrum Analysis
7.
Allergol Select ; 5: 1-25, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33426426

ABSTRACT

With the advent of biologicals, more and more therapeutics are available that specifically address specific switch points in the pathomechanism of immunologically dominated diseases. Thus, the focus of diagnostics and therapy (precision medicine) is more on the individual disease characteristics of the individual patient. Regarding the different phenotypes of atopic diseases, severe asthma was the first entity for which biologicals were approved, followed by urticaria, and finally atopic dermatitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Experience in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma has shown that the intensity of the response to biological therapy depends on the quality of clinical and immunological phenotyping of the patients. This also applies to different diseases of the atopic form, as patients can suffer from several atopic diseases at the same time, each with different characteristics. Biologics are already emerging that may represent a suitable therapy for allergic bronchial asthma, which often occurs together with severe neurodermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. In practice, however, the question of possible combinations of biologicals for the therapy of complex clinical pictures of individual patients is increasingly arising. In doing so, the side effect profile must be taken into account, including hypersensitivity reactions, whose diagnostic and logistical management must aim at a safe and efficient therapy of the underlying disease. Increased attention must also be paid to biological therapy in pregnancy and planned (predictable) vaccinations as well as existing infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Before starting a biological therapy, the immune status should be checked with regard to chronic viral and bacterial infections and, if necessary, the vaccination status should be refreshed or missing vaccinations should be made up for before starting therapy. Currently, reliable data on the effect of biologicals on the immunological situation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 are not available. Therefore, research and development of suitable diagnostic methods for detection of immunologically caused side effects as well as detection of potential therapy responders and non-responders is of great importance.

9.
Am J Hum Genet ; 107(3): 527-538, 2020 09 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32758447

ABSTRACT

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe multi-systemic inflammatory disease characterized by neutrophilic pustulosis and triggered by pro-inflammatory IL-36 cytokines in skin. While 19%-41% of affected individuals harbor bi-allelic mutations in IL36RN, the genetic cause is not known in most cases. To identify and characterize new pathways involved in the pathogenesis of GPP, we performed whole-exome sequencing in 31 individuals with GPP and demonstrated effects of mutations in MPO encoding the neutrophilic enzyme myeloperoxidase (MPO). We discovered eight MPO mutations resulting in MPO -deficiency in neutrophils and monocytes. MPO mutations, primarily those resulting in complete MPO deficiency, cumulatively associated with GPP (p = 1.85E-08; OR = 6.47). The number of mutant MPO alleles significantly differed between 82 affected individuals and >4,900 control subjects (p = 1.04E-09); this effect was stronger when including IL36RN mutations (1.48E-13) and correlated with a younger age of onset (p = 0.0018). The activity of four proteases, previously implicated as activating enzymes of IL-36 precursors, correlated with MPO deficiency. Phorbol-myristate-acetate-induced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) was reduced in affected cells (p = 0.015), and phagocytosis assays in MPO-deficient mice and human cells revealed altered neutrophil function and impaired clearance of neutrophils by monocytes (efferocytosis) allowing prolonged neutrophil persistence in inflammatory skin. MPO mutations contribute significantly to GPP's pathogenesis. We implicate MPO as an inflammatory modulator in humans that regulates protease activity and NET formation and modifies efferocytosis. Our findings indicate possible implications for the application of MPO inhibitors in cardiovascular diseases. MPO and affected pathways represent attractive targets for inducing resolution of inflammation in neutrophil-mediated skin diseases.


Subject(s)
Inflammation/genetics , Interleukins/genetics , Peroxidase/genetics , Psoriasis/genetics , Skin Diseases/genetics , Adult , Animals , Cytokines/genetics , Extracellular Traps/genetics , Female , Humans , Inflammation/pathology , Interleukin-1/genetics , Interleukins/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mutation/genetics , Neutrophils/metabolism , Psoriasis/pathology , Rare Diseases/enzymology , Rare Diseases/genetics , Rare Diseases/pathology , Skin/enzymology , Skin/pathology , Skin Diseases/pathology
10.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 100(14): adv00214, 2020 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32511739

ABSTRACT

Psoriatic nail symptoms are frequent in psoriasis, affecting up to 80% of patients. Therapy responses to nail symptoms are often limited. In this multicentre non-interventional prospective study, 267 patients with nail involvement were treated with adalimumab for a period of 24 months. The efficacy of adalimumab for nail psoriasis was evaluated and predictors for better response were identified. For statistical analysis Kolmogorov-Smirnoff, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, χ2 and two-tailed Spearman's rank correlation tests were applied. After 3 and 6 months, reductions in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) of 32.8% (p < 0.001) and almost 50% (p < 0.001), respectively, were observed, compared with baseline scores (mean NAPSI score, 34.2 ± 1.3). In 6 months, 60.0% of patients achieved NAPSI50, 36.4% NAPSI75, and 21.7% NAPSI90. Approximately 42% and 60% of patients achieved NAPSI90 after 12 and 24 months, respectively. At month 12, reduction in NAPSI significantly correlated with improvement in Dermatological Life Quality Index. Stratification by age, sex, and body mass index indicated that treatment was more effective in younger patients and those with higher body mass index. Adalimumab is an effective long-term therapy for nail psoriasis. The amelioration of nail symptoms correlates with an improvements in the skin disease and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Nail Diseases , Psoriasis , Adalimumab , Humans , Nail Diseases/diagnosis , Nail Diseases/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
11.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(6): 649-658, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267471

ABSTRACT

Importance: Risankizumab selectively inhibits interleukin 23, a cytokine that contributes to psoriatic inflammation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs placebo and continuous treatment vs withdrawal in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multinational, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from March 6, 2016, to July 26, 2018. A total of 507 eligible patients had stable moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis for 6 months or longer, body surface area involvement greater than or equal to 10%, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to 12, and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score greater than or equal to 3. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Interventions: Patients were randomized (4:1, interactive response technology) to risankizumab, 150 mg, subcutaneously, or placebo at weeks 0 and 4 (part A1). All patients received risankizumab at week 16. At week 28, patients randomized to risankizumab who achieved an sPGA score of 0/1 were rerandomized 1:2 to risankizumab or placebo every 12 weeks (part B). Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary end points for the part A1 phase included proportions of patients achieving greater than or equal to 90% improvement in PASI (PASI 90) and sPGA score of 0/1 at week 16. The PASI measures severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation weighted by area of skin involvement over the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities; scores range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease activity). The sPGA assesses average thickness, erythema, and scaling of all psoriatic lesions; scores range from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), with 0/1 indicating clear or almost clear. Primary and secondary end points in part B included proportion of rerandomized patients achieving an sPGA score of 0/1 at week 52 (primary) and week 104 (secondary). Results: Of 563 patients screened, 507 were randomized to risankizumab (n = 407) or placebo (n = 100). Most patients were men (356 [70.2%]); median age was 51 years (interquartile range, 38-60 years). At week 16, 298 patients (73.2%) in the treatment group vs 2 patients (2.0%) receiving placebo achieved a PASI 90 response, and 340 patients (83.5%) receiving risankizumab vs 7 patients (7.0%) receiving placebo achieved sPGA 0/1 scores (placebo-adjusted differences: PASI 90: 70.8%; 95% CI, 65.7%-76.0%; sPGA 0/1: 76.5%; 95% CI, 70.4%-82.5%; P < .001 for both). At week 28, 336 responders were rerandomized to risankizumab (n = 111) or treatment withdrawal (n = 225). At week 52, the sPGA 0/1 score was achieved by 97 patients (87.4%) receiving risankizumab vs 138 patients (61.3%) receiving placebo. At week 104, the sPGA 0/1 score was achieved by 90 patients (81.1%) receiving risankizumab vs 16 patients (7.1%) receiving placebo (placebo-adjusted differences: week 52: 25.9%; 95% CI, 17.3%-34.6%; week 104: 73.9%; 95% CI, 66.0%-81.9%; P < .001 for both). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between risankizumab (186 [45.7%]) and placebo (49 [49.0%]) in part A1 and remained stable over time. Conclusions and Relevance: Risankizumab showed superior efficacy compared with placebo through 16 weeks and treatment withdrawal through 2 years. Risankizumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings during the 2-year trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02672852.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Withholding Treatment , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interleukin-23 Subunit p19/antagonists & inhibitors , Interleukin-23 Subunit p19/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos/administration & dosage , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 17(9): 959-973, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538732

ABSTRACT

The present guidelines are aimed at residents and board-certified physicians in the fields of dermatology, pediatrics, pediatric dermatology and pediatric rheumatology as well as policymakers and insurance funds. They were developed by dermatologists and pediatric dermatologists in collaboration with pediatric rheumatologists using a formal consensus process (S2k). The guidelines highlight topics such as disease severity, quality of life, treatment goals as well as problems associated with off-label drug therapy in children. Trigger factors and diagnostic aspects are discussed. The primary focus is on the various topical, systemic and UV-based treatment options available and includes recommendations for use and treatment algorithms. Other aspects addressed herein include vaccinations in children and adolescents with psoriasis as well as various disease subtypes such as guttate psoriasis, diaper psoriasis, pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Finally, we also provide recommendations for imaging studies and the diagnostic workup to rule out tuberculosis prior to initiating systemic treatment. Note: This article constitutes part 2 of the Sk2 guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis in children and adolescents. Part 1 was published in last month's issue. It contained introductory remarks and addressed aspects of diagnosis and topical treatment.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Psoriasis/therapy , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Biological Factors/administration & dosage , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Child , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Skin Care/methods , Tonsillectomy , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Vaccination
13.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 17(9): 913-921, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538737

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) with grayscale (GS) and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) to detect joint inflammation in patients with confirmed or suspected psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients (n = 60) with psoriasis and tenderness and/or swelling of joints were separated into two groups: diagnosis confirmed by the treating dermatologist before the start of the study (n = 26), and suspected PsA (n = 34). GS/PDUS of the hand most clinically affected was performed with a dorsal/palmar view (wrist, MCP, PIP, DIP2-5). FOI examination was carried out in a standardized manner by analyzing the predefined Phases 1-3. RESULTS: FOI was found to be more sensitive than ultrasound (US) for detection of inflammation in PIP/DIP joints (p = 0.035). Confirmed PsA patients showed more findings in FOI P2 and P3, while suspected PsA patients showed more findings in P1. In the confirmed PsA group, most involved joints were MCP joints, while in the suspected PsA group, more involved wrist joints and DIP joints (p = 0.006) were detected with FOI. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between the confirmed and suspected groups indicate that FOI is helpful in the detection of early PsA since P1 may correspond to acute inflammation, whereas P2 and P3 enhancement reflect chronic inflammation. Fluorescence optical imaging might therefore be a novel diagnostic tool for early PsA diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Early Diagnosis , Edema/diagnostic imaging , Female , Finger Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hand Dermatoses/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnostic imaging , Optical Imaging/methods , Ultrasonography , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging
16.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 17(8): 856-870, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31437363

ABSTRACT

The present guidelines are aimed at residents and board-certified physicians in the fields of dermatology, pediatrics, pediatric dermatology and pediatric rheumatology as well as policymakers and insurance funds. They were developed by dermatologists and pediatric dermatologists in collaboration with pediatric rheumatologists using a formal consensus process (S2k). The guidelines highlight topics such as disease severity, quality of life, treatment goals as well as problems associated with off-label drug therapy in children. Trigger factors and diagnostic aspects are discussed. The primary focus is on the various topical, systemic and UV-based treatment options available and includes recommendations for use and treatment algorithms. Other aspects addressed herein include vaccinations in children and adolescents with psoriasis as well as various disease subtypes such as guttate psoriasis, diaper psoriasis, pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Finally, we also provide recommendations for imaging studies and the diagnostic workup to rule out tuberculosis prior to initiating systemic treatment. Note: This article constitutes part 1 of the Sk2 guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis in children and adolescents. Part 2 will be published in the next issue. It contains chapters on UV therapy, systemic treatment, tonsillectomy and antibiotics, vaccinations, guttate psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, complementary medicine, as well as imaging studies and diagnostic workup to rule out tuberculosis prior to systemic treatment.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/pathology , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Consensus , Dermatology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Off-Label Use/statistics & numerical data , Psoriasis/psychology , Psoriasis/radiotherapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Rheumatology , Severity of Illness Index , Ultraviolet Rays
19.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 17(5): 503-516, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30994260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease-related to psoriasis. Its treatment is challenging, and little is known about the sustainability of different medications. The aim of this study was to analyze drug survival rates and drug discontinuation in the treatment of PPP under real-world conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PPP treated in the dermatology departments of five German university medical centers between 01/2005 and 08/2017 were included in our retrospective study. Drug survival of systemic therapies was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Overall, 347 patients with 935 treatment courses were identified. Within the group of non-biologic systemic agents, apremilast showed the highest median drug survival (15 months), followed by cyclosporine (12 months), the combination of acitretin and topical PUVA (9 months), MTX (8 months), acitretin monotherapy (6 months), alitretinoin (5 months), and fumaric acid esters (3 months). Among biologicals, the highest maintenance rate was detected for certolizumab pegol (restricted mean: 47.4 months), followed by infliximab (median: 26 months), golimumab (22 months), ustekinumab (21 months), adalimumab (18 months), secukinumab (9 months), and etanercept (8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Biologicals and apremilast may serve as second-line options for treatment of PPP and should be further evaluated.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Substitution , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Adult , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Female , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , PUVA Therapy/methods , PUVA Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
BioDrugs ; 32(5): 397-404, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30269270

ABSTRACT

The nocebo effect is defined as the incitement or the worsening of symptoms induced by any negative attitude from non-pharmacological therapeutic intervention, sham, or active therapies. When a patient anticipates a negative effect associated with an intervention, medication or change in medication, they may then experience either an increase in this effect or experience it de novo. Although less is known about the nocebo effect compared with the placebo effect, widespread interest in the nocebo effect observed with statin therapy and a literature review highlighting the nocebo effect across at least ten different disease areas strongly suggests this is a common phenomenon. This effect has also recently been shown to play a role when introducing a medication or changing an established medication, for example, when switching patients from a reference biologic to a biosimilar. Given the important role biosimilars play in providing cost-effective alternatives to reference biologics, increasing physician treatment options and patient access to effective biologic treatment, it is important that we understand this phenomenon and aim to reduce this effect when possible. In this paper, we propose three key strategies to help mitigate the nocebo effect in clinical practice when switching patients from reference biologic to biosimilar: positive framing, increasing patient and healthcare professionals' understanding of biosimilars and utilising a managed switching programme.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Nocebo Effect , Patient Medication Knowledge , Humans , Physician-Patient Relations , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...