ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Digital photoplethysmography is used to assess hemodynamic variability and baroreflex sensitivity. Numerous studies have critically evaluated the accuracy of the photoplethysmographic device against peripheral pressure. The aim of our study was to compare finger blood and aortic root pressure. METHODS: We prospectively compared simultaneous recordings of systolic pressure at the aortic root and finger level over three consecutive respiratory cycles in 15 patients (56+/-11 years) undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. Data were obtained at baseline, during deep breathing maneuver (0.1 Hz), and after left ventricular cineangiography. RESULTS: At baseline, systolic finger pressure overestimated systolic aortic pressure (145.2+/-22.5 vs 115.0+/-20.1 mm Hg; p<0.001). The pressure difference (30.2+/-17.0 mm Hg) was not influenced by systolic aortic pressure. There was no relationship between pressure difference and the main determinants of the pulse wave amplification phenomenon. There was a beat-to-beat relationship between finger and aortic pressure in 14 of 15 subjects (slope ranging from 0.37 to 1.70; ordinate: from -56 to +98 mm Hg). During the deep breathing maneuver and after left ventricular cineangiography, finger pressure still overestimated aortic pressure by 32.3+/-15.0 mm Hg and 38.3 13.9 mm Hg, respectively (each p<0.001). There was a beat-to-beat relationship between systolic aortic root pressure (IAoBP) and systolic finger (FBP) in 13 of 15 patients, with major scattering of both slopes and ordinates. Throughout the study, there was no predictable relationship between the level of IAoBP and pressure bias. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, FBP was almost always higher than IAoBP. Importantly, the differences in systolic pressure did not correlate with known determinants of the pulse wave amplification phenomenon. The device must be used cautiously if one wants to noninvasively track spontaneous or induced changes in IAoBP.
Subject(s)
Aorta/physiology , Blood Pressure Determination , Fingers/blood supply , Cardiac Catheterization , Cineangiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Photoplethysmography , Prospective Studies , Respiration , Sensitivity and Specificity , SystoleABSTRACT
The mean blood pressure is an accurate estimate of the end-systolic aortic pressure in children. The aim of this study was: 1) to assess the relationship between the pressure at the incisura (PIAo) and the mean (MAoP) and pulse (PAoP) pressures of the supravalvular aorta in adults: and 2) to evaluate MAoP as an estimate of PIAo in adults. High fidelity pressure recordings were carried out in the supravalvular aorta in 17 men. The pressures were measured at rest in 10 consecutive beats and. In 6 subjects, during a Valsalva manoeuvre. At rest, PIAo was greater than the MAoP (109 +/- 17.9 versus 99.6 +/- 12.5 mmHg, p = 0.0001). There was a positive linear correlation between PIAo and MAoP (r = 0.93) and between PIAo and PAoP (r' = 0.77) whereas no correlation was observed between PIAo and heart rate, cardiac output or estimated total systemic arterial compliance. A beat-to-beat relationship was observed between PIAo and MAOP: 1) at rest in 16 of the 17 subjects and 2) in each subject who performed a Valsalva manoeuvre. Both at rest and during Valsalva, MAOP underestimated PIAo significantly, especially when PIAo was increased (p = 0.0001). The authors conclude that end-systolic supraaortic pressure is mainly related to the mean component of aortic pressure. MAOP slightly but constantly underestimated PIAo and this should lead to caution in assimilating MAOP to end-systolic aortic pressure in adults, especially in subjects with very high aortic pressures.
