The Potential Unique Impacts of Hope and Resilience on Mental Health and Well-Being in the Wake of Hurricane Harvey.

Natural disasters can lead to mental health problems, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Higher levels of loss and/or disruption and prior trauma exposure constitute risk factors for mental illness, whereas protective factors, including hope and resilience, support positive functioning. The present cross-sectional study used structural equation modeling to examine the relative influence of resilience and hope on mental health and well-being 1-3 months after Hurricane Harvey made landfall in August 2017, among a sample of 829 adults in the Greater Houston, Texas area. Resilience was more strongly associated with reduced PTSD symptoms, ß = -.31, 95% CI [-.42, -.21], than was hope, ß = -.17, 95% CI [-;.30, -.04], whereas hope was more strongly associated with components of well-being, ßs = .47-.63. Hope was positively associated with posttraumatic growth, ß = .30, 95% CI [.19, .41], whereas resilience was negatively associated with posttraumatic growth, ß = -.24, 95% CI [-.35, -.12]. These associations remained consistent after considering risk factors, although more variance in trauma-related outcomes was risk factors were included in the model. The present results suggest that considering the influence of both risk and resilience factors provides an enhanced picture of postdisaster mental health.

Trajectories of change in well-being during cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders: Quantifying the impact and covariation with improvements in anxiety.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been found to be very effective in reducing many forms of mental illness, but much less is known about whether CBT also promotes mental health or well-being. The goals of the present study were to (a) quantify the magnitude and timing of changes in overall well-being and specific facets of well-being during different CBTs for anxiety disorders, (b) determine whether these effects vary across transdiagnostic and disorder-specific CBT, and (c) examine how changes in well-being during treatment relate to changes in anxiety. A total of 223 adults (55.6% female, Mage = 31.1 years) were randomized to 1 of 5 CBT protocols for anxiety disorders at an outpatient clinic. Analyses included standardized mean gain effect sizes (ESsg) and latent growth curve modeling. Moderate-to-large increases in overall well-being and the 3 components of subjective, psychological, and social well-being were observed, mainly during the second half of CBT, and these increases were maintained at a 6-month follow-up. The magnitude of effects was comparable for transdiagnostic and disorder-specific CBT protocols and greater than in the waitlist condition. Parallel process latent growth curve models indicated that trajectories of change in well-being across treatment were strongly correlated with trajectories of change in clinician-rated and self-reported anxiety. Together, these findings suggest that different CBT protocols for anxiety consistently produce robust and lasting changes in well-being, and these changes are strongly linked to changes in anxiety during treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Hope, optimism, self-efficacy, and posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analytic review of the protective effects of positive expectancies.

OBJECTIVE: The present meta-analysis consolidated research examining how positive expectancies (e.g., hope, self-efficacy, and optimism) may protect against the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHOD: Articles were identified by searching PILOTS, PsycINFO, PubMed, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses databases. RESULTS: Aggregated results from 154 studies indicated that positive expectancies were associated with lower levels of PTSD symptoms. This relationship was stronger for coping-specific self-efficacy (k = 38, r = -.49; -.54 to -.43) and hope (k = 20, r = -.34; -.39 to -.28) compared with general self-efficacy (k = 45, r = -.25; -.30 to -.20) and optimism (k = 59, r = -.29; -.33 to -.25) when examining cross-sectional studies, and results were consistent in prospective studies. Age and gender did not moderate the cross-sectional relationships. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that positive expectancies predict post-trauma resilience. Future research should identify moderators and examine positive expectancies as mechanisms of change in therapy.