A scoping review of incidence and assessment tools for post-intensive care syndrome following cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Post-intensive care syndrome is a new or worsening persistent deterioration in cognitive, mental, and/or physical health following a prolonged admission to an intensive care unit. Post-intensive care syndrome remains underexplored following cardiac surgery, with a lack of understanding of the incidence and tools used to measure the symptoms. A scoping review was conducted to determine the incidence and to identify the tools commonly used to measure symptoms of post-intensive care syndrome following cardiac surgery. METHODS: The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Scopus, and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and Google Scholar were searched with keywords and controlled vocabulary to describe both cardiac surgery and post-intensive care syndrome (cardiac surgical procedures, heart surgery, and post-intensive care symptoms) and symptoms (delirium, depression, mobility and quality of life). Included were articles written in English and published after 2005 that described cognitive, mental, and physical symptoms of post-intensive care syndrome following cardiac surgery. 3,131 articles were found, with 565 duplicates, leaving 2,566 articles to be screened. Of these, seven unique studies were included. RESULTS: Five studies explored cognitive health, three mental health, one cognitive and mental health, and none physical health. No identified studies reported the overall incidence of post-intensive care syndrome following cardiac surgery. The incidence of cognitive health issues ranged from 21% to 38%, and mental health issues ranged from 16% to 99%. In total, 17 different tools were identified - 14 for cognitive health and three for mental health. No identified studies used the same tools to measure symptoms. No single tool was found to measure all three domains. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identified a literature gap specific to the incidence and inconsistency of assessment tools for post-intensive care syndrome in cardiac surgery patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This work impacts clinical practice for the bedside nurse by raising awareness of an emerging health issue.

A strengths-based qualitative exploration of critical care nurses' reasons for remaining in critical care.

AIMS: Globally, the nursing shortage is a growing concern. Much of the research on retention of nurses focuses on the experience of those who left positions. In this study, we set out to listen to critical care nurses (CCRNs) who have chosen to remain in their positions to understand the factors retaining them in critical care. DESIGN: This interpretive descriptive study was guided by the following research question: 'what factors influence CCRN's decision to continue to work in critical care?' METHODS: Digitally recorded interviews and a focus group were conducted between July 2022 and January 2023 using a semi-structured, strengths-based interview guide with CCRNs from three critical care units at a tertiary hospital in a city in a central Canadian province. Transcribed interviews were analysed using open, axial and selective coding and constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two CCRNs participated in interviews and three in a focus group. The theme of Respect, demonstrated through the interconnected concepts of Working to Full Scope, Team, Rotations and Compensation was identified. Working to Full Scope was described as providing nursing care aligned with how each nurse envisions what nursing is. Being part of a Team led by strong nurse leaders that provides opportunities and supports the sharing of their perspectives was also found. Respect was also found to be demonstrated through Rotations that recognize that work is one part of these nurses' lives. Compensation that reflects the increased education, knowledge and skills required in critical care was the final concept of Respect. CONCLUSION: Organizations should focus their efforts across the identified concepts to demonstrate Respect for CCRNs and retain them. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings of this study provide ways to support the retention of CCRNs. IMPACT: This research will have an impact on nursing leaders by providing tangible ways to retain CCRNs. REPORTING METHOD: Reporting of this work was guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Misclassification of VLCAD carriers due to variable confirmatory testing after a positive NBS result.

The Iowa Newborn Screening (NBS) Program began screening for very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCAD) in 2003. Untreated VLCAD can lead to liver failure, heart failure, and death. Current confirmatory testing recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) for VLCAD list molecular and functional analysis (i.e., fibroblast fatty acid oxidation probe) as optional. This can lead to misclassification of VLCAD carriers as false positives. Iowa implemented a comprehensive VLCAD confirmatory testing algorithm at the beginning of 2016 that included both molecular and fibroblast analysis. Here, we compare the historic multi-algorithmic confirmatory testing protocol (2005-2016) to this comprehensive protocol (2016-2017). A metabolic specialist reviewed all medical records and NBS data for each out-of-range VLCAD that fell in each testing period. During the comprehensive testing period, 48,651 specimens were screened. Thirteen individuals with out-of-range C14:1 results were classified as follows after review: ten carriers, zero true positives, zero false positives, zero lost to follow-up, and four unable to assess carrier status. During the variable testing period, a total of 486,566 specimens were screened. Eighty-five individuals with out-of-range C14:1 were classified as follows: 45 carriers, two true positives, four false positives, four lost to follow-up, and 30 unable to assess carrier status. Our findings suggest that many out-of-range VLCAD cases that do not receive molecular confirmatory testing could be carriers mistakenly classified as false positives. We recommend comprehensive molecular and functional testing for all children with out-of-range VLCAD NBS results.

Multiple Risk Factor Counseling to Promote Heart-healthy Lifestyles in the Chest Pain Observation Unit: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Admission to the chest pain observation unit (CPOU) may be an advantageous time for patients to consider heart-healthy lifestyle changes while undergoing diagnostic evaluation to rule out myocardial ischemia. The aim of this pragmatic trial was to assess the effectiveness of a multiple risk factor intervention in changing CPOU patients' health beliefs and readiness to change health behaviors. A secondary aim was to obtain preliminary estimates of the intervention's effect on diet, physical activity, and smoking. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of a moderate-intensity counseling intervention that aimed to build motivation to change and problem-solving skills in 140 adult patients with at least one modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (CRF) who were admitted to the CPOU of an academic emergency department (ED) with symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome. Study patients were randomly assigned to full counseling (face-to-face cardiovascular risk assessment and personalized counseling on nutrition, physical activity, and smoking cessation in the ED, plus two telephone follow-up sessions) or minimal counseling (brief instruction [<5 minutes] on benefits of modifying cardiovascular risk factors) by a cardiac rehabilitation specialist. We measured Health Belief Model constructs for ischemic heart disease, stage of change, and self-reported CRF-related behaviors (diet, exercise, and smoking) during 6-month follow-up using previously validated measures. We used linear mixed models and logistic regression (with generalized estimating equations) to compare continuous and dichotomous behavioral outcomes across treatment arms, respectively. RESULTS: Approximately 20% more patients in the full counseling arm reported having received counseling on diet and physical activity during CPOU admission, compared to the minimal counseling arm; a similar proportion of patients in both counseling arms reported having received advice or assistance in quitting smoking. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for any cardiovascular health beliefs, readiness to change, or CRF-related behaviors during longitudinal follow-up. In secondary analyses in both treatment arms combined, however, patients showed significant differences between follow-up and baseline measurements: increases in the perceived benefits of improving CRF-related behaviors (27.7 vs. 26.6 on a scale from 7 to 35, p = 0.0001) and increased readiness to change dietary behavior and physical activity during follow-up-intake of saturated fat (83% vs. 49%), readiness to change fruit and vegetable consumption (83% vs 56%), and readiness to perform regular exercise (34% vs. 14%) at 6 months and baseline, respectively (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons in both treatment arms combined). CONCLUSIONS: A multiple risk factor intervention that focused on increasing motivation to change and problem-solving skills did not significantly improve behavioral outcomes, compared to minimal counseling. Patients admitted to the CPOU demonstrated sustained changes in several cardiovascular health beliefs and risk-related behaviors during follow-up; this provides further evidence that the CPOU visit is a "teachable moment" for cardiovascular risk reduction. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of ED-initiated counseling interventions to engage patients in changing cardiovascular risk behaviors, in coordination with primary care.