Personalized Deep Learning for Substance Use in Hawaii: Protocol for a Passive Sensing and Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered digital therapies that detect methamphetamine cravings via consumer devices have the potential to reduce health care disparities by providing remote and accessible care solutions to communities with limited care solutions, such as Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Pacific Islander communities. However, Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Pacific Islander communities are understudied with respect to digital therapeutics and AI health sensing despite using technology at the same rates as other racial groups. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to understand the feasibility of continuous remote digital monitoring and ecological momentary assessments in Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Pacific Islander communities in Hawaii by curating a novel data set of longitudinal Fitbit (Fitbit Inc) biosignals with the corresponding craving and substance use labels. We also aimed to develop personalized AI models that predict methamphetamine craving events in real time using wearable sensor data. METHODS: We will develop personalized AI and machine learning models for methamphetamine use and craving prediction in 40 individuals from Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Pacific Islander communities by curating a novel data set of real-time Fitbit biosensor readings and the corresponding participant annotations (ie, raw self-reported substance use data) of their methamphetamine use and cravings. In the process of collecting this data set, we will gain insights into cultural and other human factors that can challenge the proper acquisition of precise annotations. With the resulting data set, we will use self-supervised learning AI approaches, which are a new family of machine learning methods that allows a neural network to be trained without labels by being optimized to make predictions about the data. The inputs to the proposed AI models are Fitbit biosensor readings, and the outputs are predictions of methamphetamine use or craving. This paradigm is gaining increased attention in AI for health care. RESULTS: To date, more than 40 individuals have expressed interest in participating in the study, and we have successfully recruited our first 5 participants with minimal logistical challenges and proper compliance. Several logistical challenges that the research team has encountered so far and the related implications are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We expect to develop models that significantly outperform traditional supervised methods by finetuning according to the data of a participant. Such methods will enable AI solutions that work with the limited data available from Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Pacific Islander populations and that are inherently unbiased owing to their personalized nature. Such models can support future AI-powered digital therapeutics for substance abuse. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46493.

Cannabis use among cancer patients and survivors in the United States: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: How cannabis products are being used by cancer patients and survivors in the United States is poorly understood. This study reviewed observational data to understand the modes, patterns, reasons, discontinuation, and adverse experiences of cannabis use. METHODS: PubMed and PsycINFO database searches were conducted between May 2022 and November 2022. Of the 1162 studies identified, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. The intercoder agreement was strong (0.81). RESULTS: The majority (74%) of the studies were cross-sectional in design. Study samples were approximately equal proportions of men and women and majority White participants. The prevalence of cannabis use based on national samples ranged between 4.8% and 22%. The most common modes of cannabis intake were topical application (80%), smoking (73%), vaping (12%), and ingestion of edible products (10%). Younger age, male gender, being a current or former smoker, and higher socioeconomic status were associated with greater likelihood of cannabis use. The main motive for cannabis use was management of symptoms due to cancer or cancer treatment such as pain, nausea, lack of sleep, and anxiety. A majority of the participants across studies reported that cannabis helped reduce these symptoms. Lack of symptom improvement, side effects such as fatigue and paranoia, cost, and social stigma were identified as some of the reasons for discontinuing cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that cannabis may help cancer patients and survivors manage symptoms. However, more longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether positive experiences of cannabis use outweigh adverse experiences over time in this vulnerable population.

Psychiatric and substance use disorders among adults over age 50 who use cannabis: A matched cohort study using electronic health record data.

INTRODUCTION: Adults over age 50 increasingly use cannabis, but few studies have examined co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders (SUDs) in this population. The current study utilized electronic health record (EHR) data to compare adults age 50 + with ICD-10 cannabis codes (cases) and matched controls on common psychiatric and SUDs from 2016 to 2020. METHOD: Patients age 50 + from an integrated healthcare system in Hawai'i were identified using ICD-10 codes for cannabis (use, abuse, and dependence) from 2016 to 2018. In a matched cohort design, we selected non-cannabis-using controls (matched on sex and age) from the EHR (n = 275) and compared them to cases (patients with an ICD-10 cannabis code; n = 275) on depressive and anxiety disorders and SUDs (i.e., tobacco, opioid, and alcohol use disorders) over a two-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Participants were 62.8 years (SD = 7.3) old on average; and were White (47.8 %), Asian American (24.4 %), Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (19.3 %), or Unknown (8.5 %) race/ethnicity. Conditional multiple logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios comparing cases vs controls. Participants with an ICD-10 cannabis code had a significantly greater risk of major depressive disorder (OR = 10.68, p < 0.0001) and any anxiety disorder (OR = 6.45, p < 0.0001), as well as specific anxiety or trauma-related disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD) and SUDs (ORs 2.72 - 16.00, p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Over a two-year period, diverse adults age 50 + in Hawai'i with ICD-10 cannabis codes experienced higher rates of subsequent psychiatric and SUDs compared to controls. These findings can guide efforts to inform older adults about possible cannabis-related risks.

A Systematic Literature Review of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Youth Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Use.

Rates of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use are exponentially increasing in youth and young adults within the United States, including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) youth in Hawai'i. Disproportionately high ENDS use rates for AANHPI youth point to the need to understand the empirical literature in this area. A systematic literature review is a prerequisite for programs effectively curbing AANHPI youths' elevated use of ENDS. This systematic literature review examines empirical studies published between 2010-2020 on ENDS and their use as it applies to AANHPI youth. A total of 11 articles were identified using specific inclusionary and exclusionary criteria in a literature search. Studies described individual and interpersonal correlates to ENDS use. Notably, there were no published ENDS intervention studies detailed to AANHPI youth. Implications of these studies for prevention and social welfare interventions are discussed.

Momentary Craving, Craving Variability, and Cannabis Use: Associations With THC Concentrates and Sex.

OBJECTIVE: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies are well positioned to assess the impact of craving on cannabis use in real time and may better capture its time-varying nature. The goal of this exploratory study was to examine whether momentary craving and craving variability predict subsequent use of cannabis and how baseline concentrate use status and male sex might affect these relationships. METHOD: College students residing in a state with legal recreational cannabis use who used cannabis twice a week or more completed a baseline interview and signal-contingent EMA for 2 weeks using a smartphone application. Hierarchical (multi-level) regression was used to examine time-lagged associations between craving, craving variability, and subsequent cannabis use. Baseline concentrate use and male sex were examined as moderators. RESULTS: Participants (N = 109) included 59% women, with an average age of 20.2 years, and most using cannabis near-daily or daily. A main effect for craving (within-level effect) on the likelihood of cannabis use at the next EMA instance was found (odds ratio = 1.292, p < .001), although this effect was moderated by concentrate use status. For men, between-level increases in craving led to a greater likelihood of cannabis use at the next instance, but greater craving variability led to a lower likelihood of use. Greater variability in craving was associated with a greater likelihood of cannabis use among those using concentrates. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of craving may differ based on important participant characteristics. More research examining the fluctuating nature of craving and the role of cannabis potency on craving is warranted.

Tobacco use among native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander youth in the U.S. and USAPI: a systematic review of the literature.

With rates of tobacco use among youth in the United States on the rise, further analysis of disproportionately impacted populations, like Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders (NHPIs), is needed. NHPIs face a unique set of challenges compared to other ethnic minorities that contribute to their health disparities from tobacco use. This systematic literature review investigated empirical studies published between 2010-2020 on tobacco use among NHPI youth and young adults. Using comprehensive literature search engines and focused author searches of tobacco researchers in NHPI communities, 7,208 article abstracts were extracted for potential inclusion. Explicit inclusionary and exclusionary criteria were used to identify peer-reviewed articles related to tobacco use correlates and interventions for NHPI youth populations. A total of 17 articles met our criteria for inclusion in this study. Community influences, peer pressure, social status, variety of flavors, craving, and stimulation were correlates found in smoking and vaping for NHPI youth. There were also few published tobacco use prevention and intervention studies focused specifically on NHPI youth. Our study addresses the needs of an under-researched population that is heavily affected by the adverse consequences of short-term and long-term use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Additional research should focus on developing effective and culturally relevant interventions to reduce NHPI health disparities.

Momentary patterns of alcohol and cannabis co-use in college students: Assessing the temporal association with anxiety.

Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we assessed momentary patterns of alcohol and cannabis co-use in college students and whether state-level and baseline reports of anxiety varied based on type of substance(s) consumed. Students (N=109) reporting regular cannabis use completed a baseline assessment and two-week signal-contingent EMA, with three random prompts/day. At each EMA instance, we categorized instances of substance "usage" as: 1) no use, 2) cannabis-only, 3) alcohol-only, or 4) co-use of alcohol and cannabis (i.e., reports of alcohol and cannabis use within the same prompt). Using temporal sequenced data, we explored how state-level anxiety varied before and after usage type using multiple multilevel structural equation models (MSEMs) and whether baseline factors (general anxiety, social anxiety, and sex) influenced the relation between usage type and state-level anxiety. Participants were 63.3% White, 58.7% female, used cannabis near-daily, and commonly reported co-use. Models examining whether usage type predicted subsequent state-level anxiety were predominantly significant, with the majority of relationships being more pronounced for participants with higher baseline general anxiety. In examining whether momentary state-level anxiety predicted usage type, in instances when participants reported higher levels of momentary anxiety, they were more likely to report no use compared to co-use and cannabis-only, with sex moderating some of the relationships. Social anxiety did not moderate any of the within-person associations between state-level anxiety and usage type. This study provides preliminary evidence that report of momentary anxiety varies based on substance type. Future research is needed to establish co-use related synergistic effects and correlates.

Chronic health conditions, acute health events, and healthcare utilization among adults over age 50 in Hawai'i who use cannabis: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Research on cannabis-related health outcomes in diverse older adults is limited. The current study utilized a matched cohort study design to compare older adults in Hawai'i with identified cannabis diagnoses and matched controls on chronic health conditions, acute health events, and healthcare utilization from 2016 to 2020. METHOD: Patients age 50 + were identified using ICD-10 diagnostic codes for cannabis use, abuse, and dependence using electronic health record data from an integrated health system (Kaiser Permanente Hawai'i). Those with cannabis diagnoses (n = 275) were compared to matched non-using controls (n = 275; based on age, sex) on chronic health conditions (coronary heart disease, hypertension, COPD, chronic non-cancer pain), acute health events (myocardial infarction, respiratory symptoms, stroke, persistent or cyclic vomiting, injuries), and healthcare utilization (outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department visits) following case identification for two years. RESULTS: Participants were 19.3% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 24.4% Asian, 47.8% White, and 8.5% Other/Unknown, with an average age of 62.8 years (SD=7.3). Adjusting for covariates as possible, participants with a cannabis diagnosis had significantly greater risk of coronary heart disease, chronic non-cancer pain, stroke, myocardial infarction, cyclic vomiting, and injuries, over time, compared to controls. Cannabis use was associated with any and greater frequency of outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse sample, older adults who used cannabis had worse health conditions and events and used more health services over a two-year period. Future studies should evaluate cannabis-related health outcomes, effects of cannabis problem severity, as well as implications for healthcare in aging populations.

Characteristics associated with motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene among hospitalized patients who inject drugs.

Background: Hospitalizations for people who inject drugs (PWID) are opportunities to address substance use. However, little is known about hospitalized PWIDs' motivation to stop substance use or improve skin and needle hygiene, common means for reducing injection sequelae. Methods: We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to improve skin and needle hygiene among 252 hospitalized PWID between January 2014 and June 2018. We examined motivation (scale 1-10) to stop substance use, use new needles, and clean skin and used multiple linear regression models to evaluate characteristics associated with these outcomes. Results: PWID were recruited during injection-related (154, 61.1%) and non-injection-related hospitalizations (98, 38.9%). Motivation to stop substance use was 7.11 (SD = 2.67), use new needles was 7.8 (SD = 1.9), and clean skin was 6.7 (SD = 2.3). In adjusted models, experiencing an injection-related hospitalization was not significantly associated (p > 0.05) with motivation to stop substance use (ß = -0.76, SE = 0.299), use new needles (ß = 0.301, SE = 0.255), or clean skin (ß = 0.476, SE = 0.323). Number of past-year skin and soft tissue infections was negatively associated with motivation to use new needles (ß = -0.109, SE = 0.049, p < 0.05) and clean skin (ß = -0.131, SE = 0.062, p < 0.05). Greater opioid withdrawal was associated with lower motivation to use new needles (ß = -0.275, SE = 0.92, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among hospitalized PWID, motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene was moderately high, but injection-related hospitalizations were not associated with greater motivation. Efforts to reduce injection sequelae for all hospitalized PWID are needed.

Under the Skin: The Relationship Between Subcutaneous Injection and Skin Infections Among People Who Inject Drugs.

OBJECTIVES: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at increased risk for numerous negative health outcomes. Subcutaneous injections (aka skin popping) can result in greater risk of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), but less is known about PWID who choose this route of administration. This study compares subcutaneous injectors to intravenous injectors, characterizes those who inject subcutaneously, and examines whether subcutaneous injection is associated with SSTIs in the past year. METHODS: A cohort of hospitalized PWID (n = 252) were interviewed regarding injection-related behaviors, history of SSTI, and knowledge of subcutaneous injection risk. We examined differences between those who do and do not inject subcutaneously and used a negative binomial regression model to estimate adjusted odds associating subcutaneous injection and SSTI. RESULTS: Participants averaged 38 years, with 58.3% male, 59.5% White, 20.6% Black, and 15.9% Latinx. PWID who performed subcutaneous injection were not demographically different from other PWID; however, the mean rate of past year SSTIs was higher for persons injecting subcutaneously than for those who did not (1.98 vs 0.96, P < 0.001). Persons injecting subcutaneously did not differ from those who injected intravenously in terms of their knowledge of subcutaneous injection risk (P = 0.112) and knowledge score was not associated with SSTIs (P = 0.457). CONCLUSIONS: PWID who perform subcutaneous injections are demographically similar to other PWID but had higher rates of past year SSTIs. Knowledge of subcutaneous injection risk was not associated with SSTI risk.

Ethnicity and the mechanisms of point-of-sale e-cigarette marketing's influence on behavior: A longitudinal study.

Objective: To test the mechanisms by which exposure to point-of-sale (POS) e-cigarette marketing mediate the relationship between an ethnic minority group highly vulnerable for tobacco product use, namely Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (NHPI), and increased future e-cigarette use through explicit (positive outcome expectancies) and implicit (spontaneous positive reactions) pathways. Method: Four waves of data were collected in 6-month intervals from 2,327 multiethnic young adults (Mage = 21.2, SD = 2.2; 54% women) enrolled across two 4-year and four 2-year colleges belonging to a University system in Hawaii. POS e-cigarette marketing exposure was assessed with an objective measure involving store visit patterns and store audits, as well as a measure of self-reported exposure. Spontaneous reactions were assessed with an implicit measure, namely Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP). Path analyses were used to test the hypotheses. Results: In a model employing the objective measure of POS exposure, a statistically significant pathway was found from NHPI ethnicity to increased current e-cigarette use at Wave 4 mediated through increased POS exposure at Wave 2, and increased affect regulation expectancies at Wave 3. Similar indirect effects on prospective e-cigarette use were found for Asian ethnicity. The dual process model of the effects of POS exposure on e-cigarette use was not fully supported, although the implicit measure was found to independently predict e-cigarette use. Conclusions: Differential exposure to POS marketing may explain some of the ethnic disparities in tobacco product use behavior such as e-cigarette use. POS marketing may affect e-cigarette use behavior mainly through the explicit pathway, notably affect regulation expectancies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Behavioral Risk Factors for HIV Infection in Hospitalized Persons Who Co-use Stimulants and Opioids.

We investigated the association of 90-day opioid and stimulant co-use and HIV risk behaviors in a cross-sectional analysis of hospitalized HIV-negative people who inject drugs (PWID). We compared those injecting opioids alone to two sub-groups who co-used opioids with (1) cocaine, (2) amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS), on sex and injection drug risk behaviors assessed via the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB), where a higher score indicates a higher risk. Of 197 participants who injected opioids, 53% co-used cocaine only, 5% co-used ATS only, 18% co-used both cocaine and ATS, 24% co-used neither stimulant. PWID who injected opioids alone had a mean RAB drug risk score of 5.98 points and sex risk score of 2.16 points. Compared to PWID who injected opioids alone, PWID who co-used stimulants had higher mean drug risk RAB scores: cocaine, b = 2.84 points [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01; 4.67]; ATS, b = 3.43 points (95% CI 1.29; 5.57). Compared to PWID who injected opioids alone, cocaine co-use was associated with higher sex RAB scores b = 1.06 points (95% CI 0.32; 1.79). Overall, we found a significant association between stimulant co-use and higher HIV sex and drug risk scores.

RESUMEN: Investigamos la asociación entre el uso conjunto de opioides y estimulantes durante 90 días y las conductas de riesgo frente al VIH en un análisis transversal de personas hospitalizadas que se inyectan drogas y que son VIH negativas ("PWID" en lo sucesivo). Se comparó a los que consumían únicamente opioides con dos subgrupos que consumían opioides junto con (1) cocaína, (2) estimulantes de tipo anfetamínico ("ATS" en lo sucesivo), en relación con las conductas de riesgo evaluadas mediante la Serie de Pruebas de Evaluación de Riesgos ("RAB" en lo sucesivo). De los 197 participantes, el 53% sólo consumía cocaína, el 5% sólo ATS y el 18% cocaína y ATS; el 24% restante únicamente se inyectaba opiáceos. En comparación con las PWID que únicamente se inyectaban opioides, las PWID que consumían paralelamente estimulantes tenían puntuaciones medias más altas en el RAB de riesgo de drogas: cocaína, b = 2.84 puntos (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95% 1.01; 4.67); ATS, b = 3.43 puntos (IC del 95% 1.29; 5.57). En comparación con las PWID que únicamente se inyectaban opioides, el co-consumo de cocaína se relacionó con puntuaciones más altas en la RAB en el sexo (1.06 puntos, IC del 95% 0.32; 1.79). En general, se encontró una asociación significativa entre el co-consumo de estimulantes y las puntuaciones más altas de riesgo sexual y de drogas frente al VIH.

Sex Differences in Injection Drug Risk Behaviors Among Hospitalized Persons.

OBJECTIVES: As opioid use increases, it remains important to assess factors that contribute to injection drug risk behaviors, as sharing needles and other drug use equipment contributes to the spread of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. Such risks may differ by sex and injecting with others. The current study examined factors that contribute to increased injection drug risk separately for men and women. METHODS: People who inject drugs were recruited at an academic safety-net hospital that reported recent injection drug use. Two main injection outcomes were assessed: (1) human immunodeficiency virus drug risk behaviors as assessed by the Risk Assessment Battery and (2) the number of times participants injected drugs with a needle used by someone else. For each outcome, different models for women and men were conducted to detect differences by sex. RESULTS: Both men and women were more likely to inject with a needle used by someone else if they used drugs within a sexual relationship (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 14.61, P < 0.01; IRR = 7.17, P < 0.05). Being employed was associated with lower risk assessment battery scores among men, and lower mean rates of using a needle used by someone else among women (IRR = 0.22, P < 0.05). Women with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and men with higher depression scores had higher rates of injecting with a needle used by someone else. CONCLUSIONS: People who inject drugs who are in intimate relationships report higher injection drug risk behaviors. We found benefits to employment among both men and women. Identifying factors associated with increased injection risk behaviors can be useful for creating interventions tailored by sex.

Exposure to e-cigarette content on social media and e-cigarette use: An ecological momentary assessment study.

This pilot ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study tested the associations between exposure to anti-e-cigarette content on social media and e-cigarette use behavior. For exposure to anti-e-cigarette posts, participants were asked to follow the study account on Instagram, on which anti-e-cigarette content were posted regularly. In addition, we assessed participants' exposure to pro-e-cigarette content in their daily lives and examined the effects of such exposure on behavior. Participants were 29 diverse young adult current e-cigarette users (18-30 year olds; 54% women), who provided data 3 times daily, for 3 weeks via a mobile phone based EMA application. Relative to no exposure, exposure to anti-e-cigarette content was associated with decreased recent e-cigarette use frequency at the next assessment time-point (p < 0.05; 2-tailed). In addition, a statistically significant concurrent association was found between exposure to pro-e-cigarette content (relative to no exposure) and higher e-cigarette use (p < 0.05; 2-tailed). The current data are some of the first to show that exposure to anti-e-cigarette content on social media may have real time effects on decreased e-cigarette use among young adults as they go about their daily lives. Policies and efforts designed to regulate pro-e-cigarette and promote anti-e-cigarette content on social media may help reduce e-cigarette use among young people.

Correlates of tobacco use among Asian and Pacific Islander youth and young adults in the U.S.: A systematic review of the literature.

Rates of tobacco product use, including the use of combustible and electronic cigarettes, remain high in youth and young adults within the U.S. Though a substantial body of work has examined risk factors associated with initiation and ongoing use of tobacco products, research on tobacco use and associated correlates among Asian and Pacific Islanders (APIs) has been more limited despite high rates in select API subgroups. This systematic review outlines recent research (2010-2020) on the correlates of tobacco use in APIs aged 9-29. To better understand determinants of tobacco use and identify gaps in the literature, we framed correlates based on the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) multidimensional research framework. Database and author-focused searches were conducted, followed by article abstract and full-text reviews, much of which were guided by a discrete set of inclusionary and exclusionary criteria related to tobacco use and youth/young adults. A total of 24 articles were included in this review. The majority of articles focused on individual-level correlates, with a high number of studies demonstrating association between behavioral and sociocultural factors and tobacco product use behavior. Interpersonal factors also made up a substantial portion of the literature, commonly focusing on peer, family, and social norms. Gaps related to the NIMHD model are addressed. Future research should examine biological and community/societal factors associated with API smoking to better understand unique correlates in this population and to inform tobacco prevention and intervention approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Mental health treatment use among cannabis users aged 50+: Associations with cannabis use characteristics.

BACKGROUND: This study examined associations of mental health treatment use and perceived treatment need with cannabis use characteristics (medical vs. nonmedical use, initiation age, use frequency, and cannabis use disorder) among past-year cannabis users aged 50+. METHODS: Data came from the 2015-2019 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (N = 44,007). After comparing past-year cannabis users with nonusers and nonmedical users with medical users on sociodemographic and health-related factors, the research questions were examined with logistic regression models. RESULTS: In addition to mental disorders, medical use, compared to nonmedical use, was associated with higher odds of psychotherapeutic prescription medication use (AOR = 1.47, 95 % CI = 1.07-2.01) and any mental health treatment (prescription medication, outpatient care and/or inpatient care) (AOR = 1.51, 95 % CI = 1.13-2.03). Compared to 1-29 days of use, nonmedical users who used on 100-199 days (AOR = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.40-0.89) and medical users who used on 200-365 days users (AOR = 0.48, 95 % CI = 0.26-0.87) had lower odds of treatment receipt. Factors associated with increased odds of receiving treatment included discussion with a healthcare professional about drug use, higher education, and having health insurance. Other illicit drug use, chronic illnesses, and female gender were associated with higher odds of perceived treatment need, while having health insurance was associated with lower odds. CONCLUSIONS: Some older adults may use medical cannabis as an adjunct to professional mental health treatment while others may use it as a substitute. Affordability and accessibility gaps followed by cultural and personal sense of stigma and self-sufficiency beliefs appear to be barriers to receiving professional care.

Association of skin infections with sharing of injection drug preparation equipment among people who inject drugs.

BACKGROUND: Sharing needles and injection drug preparation equipment (IDPE) among people who inject drugs (PWID) are well-established risk factors for viral transmission. Shared needles and IDPE may serve as bacterial niduses for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Given the rising rates of SSTI in PWID, we investigated the association of needle and IDPE sharing on incidence of SSTI in a cohort of PWID. METHODS: Inpatient PWID (N = 252) were recruited to a randomized controlled trial of an intervention aimed at reducing infections. The primary outcome was self-reported incidence of SSTI one-year post-hospitalization. In this secondary analysis, we assessed two variables: 1) sharing of IDPE alone, 2) sharing needles with or without IDPE, and compared these groups separately to persons who reported no sharing of needles or IDPE via a mixed-effects negative binomial regression model to estimate the effect of baseline sharing behavior on SSTI during follow-up via incidence rate ratios (IRR). RESULTS: Participant characteristics: 38 years [mean], 58% male, 60% White, 90% primarily injected opioids, 1.58 (± 2.35) mean SSTI in the year prior to baseline. In terms of sharing behavior, 29% didn't share needles or IDPE, 13% shared IDPE only, and 58% shared needles with or without IDPE three months prior to baseline. After adjusting for co-variables, PWID who shared IDPE alone had a 2.2 fold higher IRR of SSTI (95%CI 1.27; 3.85, p = 0.005) and PWID who shared needles with or without IDPE had a 3.31 fold higher IRR of SSTI (95%CI 2.04; 5.37, p < 0.001), compared to those who did not share any equipment. The number of SSTI at baseline was associated with an IRR of 1.20 of SSTI during follow-up (95%CI 1.09; 1.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of hospitalized PWID, we found a significant association between baseline sharing of IDPE alone and of sharing of needles with or without IDPE with one-year incidence of SSTI.

A randomized controlled trial of a brief behavioral intervention to reduce skin and soft tissue infections among people who inject drugs.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), but few interventions have targeted their reduction. The goal of the current study was to test the effects of a brief skin and needle hygiene behavioral intervention (SKIN) in a two-group randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. METHOD: PWID (N = 252) were recruited from inpatient hospital units at a single urban medical center site and randomly assigned to an assessment-only (AO) condition or SKIN, which was a two-session intervention that included psychoeducation, behavioral skills demonstrations, and motivational interviewing. Mixed effects generalized linear models assessed the impact of the intervention on frequency of: 1) self-reported SSTIs, 2) uncleaned skin injections, and 3) injection. RESULTS: Participants were 58.3 % male, 59.5 % White, and averaged 38 years of age. SKIN participants had 35 % fewer SSTIs compared to AO (p = .179), a difference of nearly one infection per year. The mean rate of uncleaned skin injections was about 66 % lower (IRR = 0.34, 95 % CI 0.20; 0.59, p < .001) among SKIN participants compared to AO. Almost one-third of participants reported no injection over follow-up and the mean rate of injection during follow-up was about 39 % lower (IRR = 0.61; 95 % CI 0.36; 1.02, p = .058) among persons randomized to SKIN than AO. CONCLUSIONS: The SKIN intervention reduced uncleaned skin injections but did not reduce SSTIs significantly more than a control condition. Brief interventions can improve high-risk practices among PWID and lead to clinically meaningful outcomes.

Skin-cleaning among hospitalized people who inject drugs: a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To test the hypothesis that among hospitalized people who inject drugs (PWID), a brief intervention in skin-cleaning would result in greater reductions in follow-up emergency department (ED) or hospitalization rates compared with a usual care condition. DESIGN: Randomized, two-group (intervention, n = 128; usual care, n = 124), single-site clinical trial with12-month follow-up. SETTING: Hospital inpatient services in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. PARTICIPANTS: People who injected drugs on at least 3 days each week prior to hospital admission (n = 252). Participants averaged 37.9 (± 10.7) years of age; 58.5% were male, 59.3% were white and 61.1% had a diagnosis related to skin infection at enrollment. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Intervention was a skin hygiene education and skills-training behavioral intervention [short-term efficacy data on a behavioral intervention (SKIN)] consisting of two education- and skills-based skin-cleaning sessions, one during hospitalization and another 4 weeks later. The comparator was treatment as usual: an informational brochure about substance use treatment options and needle exchange programs in the area and follow-up clinical appointments as arranged by the inpatient medical staff. MEASUREMENTS: Electronic medical records were reviewed and discharge diagnoses for each ED visit and hospital admission were categorized into injection-related bacterial events (e.g. cellulitis) and non-injection-related events. Negative binomial regression was used to test the intervention effects for the primary outcome and total ED visits, as well as the secondary outcomes, total number of hospitalizations, injection drug use-related (IDU-related) ED visits and IDU-related hospitalizations. We also tested whether the outcomes were moderated by whether the initial hospitalization was IDU-related. FINDINGS: Of people assigned to SKIN, 66 completed two sessions, 55 completed one session and seven completed zero sessions. Adjusting for baseline covariates, the mean rate of total ED visits in the next 12 months was non-significantly higher [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96, 1.33, P = 0.152] compared with usual treatment. The intervention did not significantly reduce total hospitalizations or IDU-related hospitalizations. Adjusting for baseline covariates, the mean rate of injection drug use-related ED visits in the next 12 months was lower (IRR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.91, P = 0.019) compared with treatment as usual. CONCLUSIONS: A skin-cleaning intervention for people who inject drugs delivered during a hospitalization did not significantly reduce either overall emergency department use or hospitalization. There was some evidence that it may have reduced injection drug use-related emergency department visits.

Characterizing symptoms of cannabis use disorder in a sample of college students.

Since legalization of marijuana in several U.S. states in 2012, there has been concern about increases in the development of cannabis use disorder (CUD). The current study examined rates of CUD in Colorado college students who reported regular marijuana use and assessed a range of factors associated with CUD symptoms, including coping motives, concentrate/dab use, mental health concerns (depression, anxiety), age of regular marijuana use, and alcohol use. College students were recruited from a mid-sized university and completed a baseline assessment that included a marijuana urine screen. Participants reported a median of five CUD symptoms and 90% met criteria for CUD. After adjusting for covariates, age of regular marijuana use was negatively associated with number of CUD symptoms, while average daily alcohol drinks was positively associated with number of symptoms. Prevention and intervention efforts at the university level should be increased to reduce negative outcomes associated with problem marijuana use.