Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Digit Imaging ; 26(6): 1045-57, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23884657

ABSTRACT

The National Institutes of Health have placed significant emphasis on sharing of research data to support secondary research. Investigators have been encouraged to publish their clinical and imaging data as part of fulfilling their grant obligations. Realizing it was not sufficient to merely ask investigators to publish their collection of imaging and clinical data, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) created the open source National Biomedical Image Archive software package as a mechanism for centralized hosting of cancer related imaging. NCI has contracted with Washington University in Saint Louis to create The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA)-an open-source, open-access information resource to support research, development, and educational initiatives utilizing advanced medical imaging of cancer. In its first year of operation, TCIA accumulated 23 collections (3.3 million images). Operating and maintaining a high-availability image archive is a complex challenge involving varied archive-specific resources and driven by the needs of both image submitters and image consumers. Quality archives of any type (traditional library, PubMed, refereed journals) require management and customer service. This paper describes the management tasks and user support model for TCIA.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Information Storage and Retrieval , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Radiology Information Systems/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Informatics/organization & administration , Multimodal Imaging/methods , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Program Evaluation , Quality Control , Software , United States
2.
J Digit Imaging ; 22(6): 667-80, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18777192

ABSTRACT

From 2002-2004, the Lung Screening Study (LSS) of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) enrolled 34,614 participants, aged 55-74 years, at increased risk for lung cancer due to heavy cigarette smoking. Participants, randomized to standard chest X-ray (CXR) or computed tomography (CT) arms at ten screening centers, received up to three imaging screens for lung cancer at annual intervals. Participant medical histories and radiologist-interpreted screening results were transmitted to the LSS coordinating center, while all images were retained at local screening centers. From 2005-2007, all CT exams were uniformly de-identified and delivered to a central repository, the CT Image Library (CTIL), on external hard drives (94%) or CD/DVD (5.9%), or over a secure Internet connection (0.1%). Of 48,723 CT screens performed, only 176 (0.3%) were unavailable (lost, corrupted, compressed) while 48,547 (99.7%) were delivered to the CTIL. Described here is the experience organizing, implementing, and adapting the clinical-trial workflow surrounding the image retrieval, de-identification, delivery, and archiving of available LSS-NLST CT exams for the CTIL, together with the quality assurance procedures associated with those collection tasks. This collection of CT exams, obtained in a specific, well-defined participant population under a common protocol at evenly spaced intervals, and its attending demographic and clinical information, are now available to lung-disease investigators and developers of computer-aided-diagnosis algorithms. The approach to large scale, multi-center trial CT image collection detailed here may serve as a useful model, while the experience reported should be valuable in the planning and execution of future equivalent endeavors.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Data Collection , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Middle Aged , Quality Control , Radiology Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , United States
3.
Pharmacotherapy ; 25(3): 429-34, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15843290

ABSTRACT

The popularity of amiodarone has grown due to its effectiveness in converting arrhythmia and its formulation availability. Formulations of the drug also contain iodine; the iodine content is 75 mg in a 200-mg tablet of amiodarone and 18.7 mg/ml in the intravenous solution. Approximately 10% of the iodine content of oral amiodarone is released into the circulatory system and may increase the risks of hypersensitivity reactions in iodine-sensitive patients. Documented allergies to contrast media or shellfish should not imply that a patient is allergic to iodine. Reactions to contrast media are likely due to the high osmolar or ionic content of the dye. The primary allergen in shellfish that stimulates allergic reactions is tropomyosin. Although amiodarone can cause thyroid disorders due to the high iodine load delivered to the body with each dose, no known association exists between amiodarone and reactions to contrast media or shellfish. Three patients whose medical charts listed an allergy to iodine were administered amiodarone for chemical cardioversion of arrhythmia to normal sinus rhythm. No anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions were observed in any of the patients during oral or intravenous amiodarone administration. In patients with true iodine hypersensitivity, however, the potential for such reactions exists.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Iodine/adverse effects , Aged , Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...